The Catch All CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement) Thread

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by MLSFan123, Feb 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gstommylee

    gstommylee Member+

    Oct 3, 2008
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Ah he wasn't clear if he means players or teams
     
  2. chitrader

    chitrader BigSoccer Supporter

    May 2, 2002
    Hell-Lay
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Sorry, I thought you meant you heard that there's free agency in the actual deal, not the twitter rumor mill. I see Ives is suggesting maybe 28/8 has held, but I haven't seen anything specific.
     
    Allez RSL repped this.
  3. jond

    jond Member+

    Sep 28, 2010
    Club:
    Levski Sofia
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If that were to be the case, there'd actually be a bigger gap between us and the top leagues in 2021 than there is now, as salaries overseas are going up far faster than that.

    And that would be bad, point blank. We have to at least be able to keep pace as if we can't, closing the gap isn't part of the conversation.
     
    SoCalYid repped this.
  4. Inca Roads

    Inca Roads Member+

    Nov 22, 2012
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    And why those seven? They're not particularly similar in ownership, size, assets, or anything...
     
    Allez RSL repped this.
  5. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    I hope we find out.
     
  6. GalaxyKoa

    GalaxyKoa Member+

    Jul 18, 2007
    North County
    Club:
    Los Angeles
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    True but if we're maintaining the 5% increase for the next 7 years, it pretty much confirms the "A Top League by 2022" is pure fantasy. Not that I believed it would happen but I thought there would at least be some movement toward that. The only way it's going to happen with a 5% increase is with some massive off-budget type shenanigans that allow retention of HG players and the like.
     
    SoCalYid and zensum repped this.
  7. profiled

    profiled Moderator
    Staff Member

    Feb 7, 2000
    slightly north of a mile high
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    So is that how it works, each team does a vote, and majority rules?

    So you end up with 20 votes?

    Not a majority vote across the entire league?
     
  8. nowherenova

    nowherenova Member+

    Jul 20, 2003
    Formerly Terminus
    If it's good enough for Big Red, it's good enough for me!!
     
    GHjelm repped this.
  9. SoCalYid

    SoCalYid Member+

    Jun 11, 2011
    BigSoccer :)
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I would hope not. I'm ok with only a 15% jump for 2015, because the agreement came so late and it gives more time to clubs to properly build rosters. Those figures would be pretty far off we were lead to believe would be the case going forward by sources, so in that sense it would be underwhelming. I was hoping for $4.5m, better annual increases, more flexibility with fees and that new class of DP at least.
     
  10. ElJefe

    ElJefe Moderator
    Staff Member

    Feb 16, 1999
    Colorful Colorado
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Probably because of pure happenstance. My guess is that this contract has been accepted by the players, but by a fairly low margin, and the numbers for and against are close enough that some teams are going to have more players against it than for it.
     
    JasonMa and Allez RSL repped this.
  11. Zoidberg

    Zoidberg Member+

    Jun 23, 2006
    I expected at least enough for two impactful players per team. Unless there is a 4th DP of some kind call me dissappointed....and I have been pretty damn conservative about the league. Yes, I know over the years you can definitely get some quality, but I was hoping for maore of a front loaded amount that would have gotten us to five and a half/six mill.

    If the players gave up money for FA, I can see why quite a few players might be upset.

    This next week will be interesting, as we learn the details.
     
    Soccerglue and deuteronomy repped this.
  12. the5timechamp

    the5timechamp Member+

    Nov 3, 2012
    League is very prosperous.. Owners give players millions so that they may make billions.. Beckham still working on Miami deal.. Galaxy first to 10 titles.. San Jose goes from Smurfs to Snorks.. Tampax becomes a team sponsor, oddly the team they sponsor wears a red kit... Qatar WC cancelled
     
  13. sawillis

    sawillis Member

    Apr 24, 2007
    Smyrna, TN
    I could see it being higher, but that is what they got in 2010. They got a 10% immediate bump then too and that went up. We'll see.
     
  14. edwardgr

    edwardgr Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 6, 2006
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I have started a new clean thread for discussing post signing details I am closing this one down thanks for playing.
     
    LordRobin and Allez RSL repped this.
  15. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    My hunch is this: the vote was extremely close, and what we're seeing here is just random variation.

    With 13 teams it barely passed, and with 7 it narrowly failed.

    If that's the case, then it's not really indicative of anything except that it was a very close vote.

    This is, again, all hunch, and thus conjecture.
     
    Haig repped this.
  16. Heist

    Heist Member+

    Jun 15, 2001
    Virginia
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Could be the player reps (if he means the players from those teams voted against it.
    If we're talking owners, you got me how those 7 get in the same boat.
     
  17. Ismitje

    Ismitje Super Moderator

    Dec 30, 2000
    The Palouse
    Club:
    Real Salt Lake
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Time for a new thread!
     
    LordRobin and edwardgr repped this.

Share This Page