He's in second place but a whopping 30% points behind: http://msn.espn.go.com/ Right hand corner. Sub of the week.
Isn't ironic that people on here talk about how the media should take the sport seriously because it's more popular than they let on, yet polls still need to be "stuffed" in order to gain recognition?
I am shocked, shocked that you would suggest interferring with the integrity of a highly scientific internet poll.