Tha'ts a great point about all those cuisines. Talking about "Indian" food, really, is like talking about European food. As if German and Italian and Spanish cuisine are interchangeable.
So, it's just like most words in English or Spanish. Singular when it's one and plural when it's more than one. I thought you were singling it out as a word that has no plural form, like sheep.
I was singling out it’s common usage in American Football although interestingly the NFL rule book uses “offside”.
Okay, got you. I guess I missed your joke about gridiron’s usage of the word because I was thinking of it in soccer terms. But what about toad then? Is it toad because it’s one, or is it always toad, even if it’s many?
I could see Rooney's pumpkin head being his genes, but him rocking "C cups" ain't all genetics. Perhaps that's one reason why Rooney looks like a diabetic-in-training.
Based on what I've read/heard, it's more to do with liquid "sustenance" rather than what he eats. And if you're worried about my love for sticky toffee (since you seem like the caring sort), fear not. I run at least 25 miles per week and have always been below 15% body fat.
Ignore list for you ************************... Huh. Bigsoccer edits the word "moderR/ator" in a funny way.
True for the most part. But you can certainly find more "authentic" styles without too much difficulty. For instance, I love Dishoom, but fully recognize it's "hipster Indian" food---and great cocktails. In contrast, I found a little place just around the corner from St. Pancras that had some of the fan favorites but also what some would consider more authentic. I like Gallipoli (always thought it was an interesting name for a Turkish restaurant in London---bit of a dig) on Upper Street.
So, I’m getting that the proper way to say “toad” is the same as in America (and probably in Britain as well) we use for “toast”.
8-5 or 9-5 are standard first world business hours. Add in a short commute and you should be home in time to eat at 6 or so. I know the kewl hip continental Euros who are actually in and from Europe dine later than they should (but they also let kids come home for lunch and miss instructional time). South Americans eat when they can.
..and the meal is just magically prepared when you arrive home? Yeah, you missed a major step on the process.. Anyway, tangential to my point, which is that a vacation in England always feels a bit rushed. Have to wrap up your daily activities by mid-afternoon if you want to chill. Dinner at 5:30, last call at the bar at 9:00. Sad.
Getting back to sports, Eat 'em up, Tigers!* Or, Bless You, Boys!** *: That was the rallying cry of one James Van Horn, a homeless man who would be chanting that before Tigers games while also wearing Hulk hands. He was sadly killed in a hit and run years ago, but if you were attending Tigers games then, you saw him. **: Uttered by a sportscaster as a sarcasm, took on a different meaning in 1984 when they last won the World Series.
No, one of the adults living in the house prepares the meal, or both do. Parents generally arrived home by 5PM or so, depended on whether they had a late class. Dinner was generally between 5:45 and 6:30. A fair number of my neighbors were engineers whose wives stayed home, so there was never an issue with someone having to I'd be shocked to find out that London fit your description, but if it does, it does. They have more important things to do than cater to tourists. Besides, if you're in Europe, see some games instead of drinking your time away. A drunken night life encounter can take place anywhere, but you can see Prem-level ball in only three countries.
Speaking of Euros' disgusting habits. This one could've munche'd it but went the nose route instead. Bayern Munich fan caught in 4kpic.twitter.com/3iGBnb3r36— Troll Football (@TrollFootball) October 2, 2024
Yeah - you see that especially with "chinese" which in the west has tended to mean one particular art and not what most chinese would eat
That's the beauty of London - you can get pretty much anything, and of course often it's better than the original ethnic cuisine due to ingredient quality The one range where I was disappointed is Malaysian where I've never had better than mediocre. For some reason the city i was working in during the 90s had a big influx of Malays who opened restaurants - but only that city. One was successful with the classic $5 roti channai, with BYO drinks, and it was flooded with hard drinking lawyers who would bring stacks of beer and park up for the night until the police ended that - but the restaurants stuck. Similarly my hometown had excellent Thai - but no Malay Turkish is a tricky one because there are simply so many bad kebap places - but if you can seek out a genuine woodfired place - so good. This place on the Kingland road dipped the bread in lamb fat - so outrageously good. And I do agree that the 'hipsterisation' has led to way more varied options. Of course other cities can't really compete with Londons diversity
The other thing is some of this stuff is class based. Like in Penang, Indian shops catered to a lower working class minority - and was cheap as chips - but amazing tandoor chicken. Ditto most Asian cities had a broad array of cheap rice/noodle based stuff that people eat pretty much daily. Hanoi literally had a type of place which translated as "people's rice". So when I go to an authentic vietnamese place here, you could say it is influenced by that - but the quality here is much better than what you got there. I don't know how it is now, but 20 years ago, there were many Hanoi eating places that had little or no refrigeration, so goats were being slaughtered out the back on the fly. God knows what else was in some dishes.