So we are good now with not being in Conmebol now, right?

Discussion in 'USA Men' started by OWN(yewu)ED, Jul 15, 2024.

  1. Mantis Toboggan M.D.

    Philadelphia Union
    United States
    Jul 8, 2017
    This

    Better competition = better results on the field for the US at the WC plus I get to watch videos of morons storming stadium gates manned by $12/hr rent a cops from the comfort of my sofa. Win win

    Amazon destroyed the Black Friday fight video ritual, at least let us have this
     
  2. Clint Eastwood

    Clint Eastwood Member+

    Dec 23, 2003
    Somerville, MA
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    The World Cup is a FIFA event.
    It'll be fine. Just like its been fine.

    Different level of organization.

    CONMEBOL is an incompetent mess organizationally.
    It should surprise nobody that they didn't put enough thought into security and gameday logistics at the stadia.

    Competitions organized by SUM (such as the 2016 Copa America) have been fine in North America. Were there security problems at the Argentina/Chile final in 2016? No.

    SUM made a big boatload of cash in 2016. CONMEBOL wanted that for themselves. It's called greed.
    Its what they're best at.
     
  3. gomichigan24

    gomichigan24 Member+

    Jul 15, 2002
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hard Rock is pointing the blame right back at CONMEBOL, but I’m sure we’ll continue to get more reporting on this.

     
    OWN(yewu)ED repped this.
  4. morange92

    morange92 Member+

    Jan 30, 2012
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think this is just an excuse. The Copa America Centenario hosted by the US (the one SUM/USSF organized) in 2016 didn't have nearly the same problems. It's because commebol leadership are clowns who poorly prepared, not the inability of these venues to handle a south american soccer crowd and enforce security
     
  5. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    Learn from this mess and make a decent World Cup. The US/MEX/CAN bid team will be responsible for the 2026 World Cup not FIFA. With a large migrant population, the US games will be very different from anything seen in local and regional soccer games.


    Tailgate culture combined with soccer rivalry is a terrible combination. Don’t make the Qatar World Cup look like a sensible success in comparison.
     
  6. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    I don't remember a Copa America hosted by SA countries having so many recurring problems.

    The Brasil vs Argentina WCQ game had troubles in the stands. But it was dealt with and the game was played.
     
  7. morange92

    morange92 Member+

    Jan 30, 2012
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Okay admittedly that was my lazy answer to call them clowns. I'm sure in this instance it was because they hadn't organized in the US before and there were probably some issues with the logistics and coordination and getting proper security set up and all that. Which is probably not the case down there because they have experience organizing down there and know what to expect, who to coordinate with, etc to ensure everything runs relatively smoothly.
     
  8. gogorath

    gogorath Member+

    None
    United States
    May 12, 2019
    They did have to move a Libertadores final to Madrid a couple of years ago.
     
    HomietheClown and PhilipVU94 repped this.
  9. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    They had no place organizing a Copa America in the USA. They should have either partner with C'CAF or used a local organization like SUM.
     
  10. OWN(yewu)ED

    OWN(yewu)ED Member+

    Club: Venezia F.C.
    May 26, 2006
    chico, CA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Basically if this isn’t a 51/49 USA company majority enterprise next attempt gtfo
     
    SJTillIDie, RossD and soccer_23 repped this.
  11. PhilipVU94

    PhilipVU94 Member

    Liverpool FC
    United States
    Jul 6, 2024
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not sure if this matters, but a lot of standard CA finals have a true home crowd. It would take an exceeding crazy or brave Peruvian to storm the Maracanã for a Brazil-Peru final, right? I can't imagine that happening in large numbers.

    Beyond that, I hate to say it because I like their team and Colombians in general, but it sure seems like Colombia is a common thread in most of the problems this time. The US and in particular Miami has a huge Colombian-American population. Are there large numbers of Colombians trying to get in a game without a ticket in Rio, Santiago, or Buenos Aires? 2001 was the only time they've ever hosted a CA so there's not much comparison to their home games.
     
    Hexa repped this.
  12. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    That was a good call, No SA country could have hosted a Boca vs River in a Libertadores final after the attack on Boca team Bus.
     
    gogorath repped this.
  13. The Clientele

    The Clientele Member+

    Portland Timbers
    Jun 25, 2005
    Portland, Oregon
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    From what I saw, Canada is actually better than us right now. Oh yeah. Panama too.
     
  14. PhilipVU94

    PhilipVU94 Member

    Liverpool FC
    United States
    Jul 6, 2024
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Also there's a big socioeconomic difference between local migrant fans and tourist fans. Most Latin American countries have enough elite/middle class who can afford both travel and tickets every so often for major tournaments. That's a lot different than thousands of locally-resident fans in Miami, likely largely working class, wandering around outside the stadium without a ticket.
     
    Nico Limmat, PJ234 and Hexa repped this.
  15. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    At the Brazil World Cup, we had a rush from Chilean fans, Colombians aren’t known to be unruly.

    I believe this was a historic run by an in-form Colombian team, with chances to win a Copa for the first time since 2001, against World Champions Argentina with Messi and a huge migrant Colombian population, plus the quasi-religious fervor Messi drives in Argentinians. Two fanatical groups of fans doing everything they could to go or be near the final.

    If the USMNT were playing Messi’s Argentina with a good chance of winning a competition, how much would you be willing to pay to watch it live?
     
    PhilipVU94 and soccer_23 repped this.
  16. OWN(yewu)ED

    OWN(yewu)ED Member+

    Club: Venezia F.C.
    May 26, 2006
    chico, CA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    ……..2000 is relatively fair and about right knowing marketing and demand. That’s why I’d be hiring a good lawyer and not hoping for a mass payout of a 11.78 debit card

    that’s a six digit payout for an average lawyer
     
  17. soccer_23

    soccer_23 Member

    Feb 6, 2014

    Yeah honestly, I think the main reason we saw issues in Miami at only this one match was just bad luck, the confluence of circumstances you mentioned (possibly Messi’s last big Arg game at the height of Messi-mania in his home city and a historic run from Colombia in the city with the most Colombian locals). When tickets are starting at $1400, people will jump a fence.

    In 2016 and every other match this time, there were no significant issues, despite the entry and security being the same (or even lighter). But they need to have a security plan in place for these kind of circumstances.
     
  18. laxcoach

    laxcoach Member+

    United States
    Jul 29, 2017
    intermountain west
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Sucked overall but at some point I still hold out hope the US team will be good enough and well coached enough that superior competition is exactly what they need to be more ready for the WC. US will always be used for ticket sales, etc in Conmebol. So be it if it makes the US team better. Right now all it did was force a coaching change which could go either way.
     
    PhilipVU94 repped this.
  19. adam tash

    adam tash Member+

    Jul 12, 2013
    Barcelona, Spain
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    a real federation would be raising holy hell for the way the USMNT was treated in this Copa America

    what have we gotten from them???? crickets

    their silence speaks volumes about their ineptitude and flaccidity

    with competent reffing and proper conditions, im sure greggg would still be in charge of the team

    im glad greggg is gone.....but that was a total shtshw

    very very corrupt and horribly ran tournament in every way...the usmnt was totally hosed.

    (I could probably make a list of 20 ways this copa sucked.....but for just one...the bracket.....basically gave argentina the title.......how are you going to out 4 of 5 top teams on the same side???? very very corrupt moneygrab)

    USSF needs to stop hiding and take a stand for once.....and not about rainbows and DEI BS...but actual on-field issues.

    IF all that is addressed, then yeah, I wuld love for USMNT to be in CONMEBOL....

    but if CONMEBOL is going to conspire against USMNT success on and off the field....well, it would still be better than CONCACAF.....but would be shtty, too
     
  20. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    I really don’t think CONMEBOL conspired against the US or Canada. There were refereeing errors in many matches.


    Which referee error, organizational mishap, or CONMEBOL plot was responsible for the US loss to Panama? That loss was responsible for the early group exit. If anything, Weah was the culprit.


    Against Panama, the US had 26% possession and 59% pass accuracy, while Panama had 74% possession and 86% pass accuracy. Again, this loss was the reason for the 3 and out, and I really don’t think CONMEBOL, the ref, or anything else beyond USSF is to blame for this loss.


    Mistakes happen, refs make bad decisions, but a good team manages to overcome them. Brazil had a clear penalty against Colombia not called; we would have been first in the group and had an easier road. But we got out in the semis because we simply aren’t good enough. CONMEBOL didn’t conspire to give Argentina an easier road to the final.


    Uruguay is better coached and a better team at this moment. Having to beat Uruguay to advance was a tough call.
     
    soccer_23 and The Clientele repped this.
  21. The Clientele

    The Clientele Member+

    Portland Timbers
    Jun 25, 2005
    Portland, Oregon
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The use of flacidity as a noun is funny.

    There are probably reasons USSF doesn’t want to raise a stink in public. More than likely, they don’t want to risk being blackballed.
     
  22. gomichigan24

    gomichigan24 Member+

    Jul 15, 2002
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    There were some bad ref decisions against the US but I don’t think it was a conspiracy as overall the refereeing in the tournament was absolutely terrible.
     
    AGomes, majspike, soccer_23 and 3 others repped this.
  23. Hexa

    Hexa Member+

    May 21, 2010
    Club:
    Vasco da Gama Rio Janeiro
    fixed my post
     
  24. Nico Limmat

    Nico Limmat Member+

    Oct 24, 1999
    Dubai, UAE
    Club:
    Grasshopper Club Zürich
    Nat'l Team:
    Switzerland
    This bears repeating. Given the prohibitive cost of travel to the US, combined with high visa hurdles, this means the vast majority of troublemakers were US citizens/green card holders/residents.
     
    gjackson2207, Hexa, PhilipVU94 and 2 others repped this.
  25. NietzscheIsDead

    NietzscheIsDead Member+

    NO WAR
    United States
    May 31, 2019
    NO WAR
    its highly likely that they were citizens of other countries.
     

Share This Page