Let me say a few things: 1. I was virulently against this war from long before its outset. 2. Every ounce of my bones felt it was a prescription for disaster for everybody concerned. 3. Our boys are fighting for their absolute lives, and the lives of everyone around them that they are trying to protect. We need to support them in every possible way, even it involves supporting the most despicable Commander-in-Chief since Benedict Arnold to do so. 4. The question I'm trying to get at is this: if the insurgents scatter our boys across the country, cut off the back lines, etc., i.e, and create an abosolute worst case scenario, and our boys have to make a run for it, what will the insurgents be like if they control Baghdad? 5. I saw a brief interview with an "insurgent" on tv last night. He said he was all for free and fair elections, as long as they weren't run by an occupying army, and an obviously biased one at that. 6. Do we even have the remotest reason to believe this guy (whoever he was)? Or do we presume that if the "insurgents" (whoever they may be) when they make it to Baghdad (i.e., control it), that they'll turn out to be the "Khmer Rouge of Islam", and after going through some of the most bloodthirsty two or three years of living that most people can't even imagine, that once they take over Baghdad, they'll just be getting started... 7. What do you think?