Isak to LFC is way more than the EPL, LFC gotta think CL champs. I don't see us beating them. I can easily see them getting mid 90s point wise. The only thing between them and the title are 1. their defense and 2. our attack. We've only gotten to 90 points once as a club. Its going to take a crazy amount of effort, luck and a fireproof game strategy for us to win it. I can easier see an FA or league cup. We are definitely a SF CL quality side. We got to the semis with a lot of injuries last season. Chelsea scare me....a lot. Banish the thought, but I can see them 2nd this season challenging into the spring for the title. By challenging I mean in touching distance like we did. They are on a roll.
Liverpool's big problem is that VVD is 34 years old. He was good last year, but the season before that we did unspeakable things to VVD at the Emirates.
We've beaten Liverpool like twice in the last 4 or 5 years. Its the one time we can't seem to win away and we always seem to get a draw. While I agree VVD is up there in age, he's better than most defenders in the league. He needs replacing eventually, sooner than later. Injuries to their central defense is what's hurt them the most.
I'm not as big of an Eze fan as most. If he get him fine, but I think we can do better. At this late stage in the game, probably not with the time constraints of getting someone in.
I'm neutral on Eze, IMO Oliseh was the bigger talent but that's neither here nor there. The real issue we have is chance creation. What would Eze do in our team? would he play as a defacto left winger who drifts in while Calafiori holds width while we're in posession? Because we need more chance creation from central areas and with Gyokores i assume that's something Arteta wants.
No Son is potentially big for Spurs. I thought so with Kane leaving and it eventually proved correct but they also suffered massive injuries last season. They have a decent midfield. With Maddison out, they'll struggle. Curious to see how City fares. They are the wild card. Will Pep have back to back bad seasons. As far as I know it hasn't happened.
Jonathan Wilson's Libero podcast had an excellent episode about this. Generally I don't follow Wilson much anymore as he is a bit yesterday's man since the proliferation of data analysis - but he is excellent on the broader historical sweeps of football. Two things really went wrong for Guardiola which suggest maybe he was ready to retire but now is staying on to see if he can fix this. First he renewed this team too late - probably banking he could get another year or so out of it. But when you look at that midfield of Rodri, DeBruyne and Gundogan (as his swiss-german army knife) - it's to die for. But they got old all at once. Secondly there is a trend towards even younger players, and loosening the tactical reins a bit. So that means a sea change in recruitment for city who until now, have been excellent at buying more developed players going into their peak years Pep's time at the top has already been much longer than is usual. This will be his tenth season at City, which is more than his entire time at Bayern & Barca combined by some distance now. According to Wilson a 10 year peak is more usual. So it might be like Klopp that his time at the absolute peak is over - though clearly even a lower level than that is a very high level. Or does he have the energy to reinvent himself yet again? Highly recommend a listen
I'll have to check it out. I used to really like Wilson too, but lately on the Guardian pod he's as annoying as all the other twats on there----AuClair and Bandini being notable exceptions.
I think his great strength is as a historian of the game Like now that you can see 10 to 20 year sweeps he shows how somewhere around 2008 for instance, football began to change quite quickly away from the control managers like Jose and Rafa Whereas the likes of Ancelotti and Pep have adapted. At one point it seemed Carlo was done, yet he had a whole second peak Wenger is kind of between that somewhere. He adapted to survive in that era but never really embraced the new ways enough. I guess his decline was really evident from around 08? But Wilson's point is it's still a very high level - Pep could struggle on for many years, though it seems he might exit more quickly like Klopp Where Wilson is weak is the actual game analysis.
So the midfield is Eze, Rice and Zubimendi? I'm hoping that means Gabriel is captain. Or are we playing with just one of Rice/Zubimendi?
Depending on opponents there could be games where you see us play more narrow and play a 4-2-3-1 with it being Zubi/Rice Saka/Ode/Eze Gyokeres or Kai. Sure you lose Martinelli's pace, but to be fair against a low block when he has a lot of possession he doesn't do a lot with it. Would much rather have Eze on the left (fairly sure he is right footed) being able to cut in while Saka can on the RW and Odegaard is more central playing off Gyokeres. The depth we now have means there are a lot of options. Alternatively when we are dominating teams I would love to see us go to a back 3 of Saliba/Gabriel/Calafiori who is comfortable in that formation, but you could also do White/Saliba/Gabriel and that gives us another attacking option.
I’ve stuck my toe in the water of a podcast called “it was what it was“ with Wilson and another guy whose name escapes me. Have learned a few things especially the long view historical context that Jitty was talking about. But haven’t decided yet on whether I stick with that pod and listen to many more shows … selectively.
Wilson's historical knowledge is next level, and I really enjoyed Inverting the Pyramid---would love to see it updated. But on the Guardian pod, he just comes off as a bit of a crank---not as much as Glendenning, which would be quite the feat, but one nevertheless.