I can't believe their "pay-to-play" model brings in as much as the windfall for them as the Pulisic transfer would? And there's another point that IF US based clubs did participate in receiving a percentage of the transfer fees what pray tell what would happen to the "pay-to-play" mode in this country? Might go the way of the dinosaur?
They are a not-for-profit that would actually have some trouble having to spend that windfall. No. Solidarity payments are too far rare, and training compensation not nearly enough, to accomplish this.