Richard Perle

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by Richth76, May 8, 2003.

  1. Richth76

    Richth76 New Member

    Jul 22, 1999
    Washington, D.C.
  2. capt. america

    capt. america Member

    Oct 5, 2001
    Boston, MA
    if i were you, i'd fight him
     
  3. Richth76

    Richth76 New Member

    Jul 22, 1999
    Washington, D.C.
    Yes, and then be threatened with one of his frivolous law suits.
     
  4. wu-tang beez

    wu-tang beez New Member

    Apr 19, 2002
    Irving, TX
    the major neoconservative figures that promoted this war yrs b4 9/11 are as follows:

    Paul Wolfowitz: grand marshall
    Richard Pearle: Propaganda minister
    Dick Cheney: the inside man
    Don Rumsfeld: The Muscle
    Paul Wolfowitz: the ex CIA legitimate arm
    William Krystol: reaganite hold over

    those are he major conspirators that convinced President Rove, err I mean Bush to strike iraq. Wolofwitz wanted to attack iraq more so than afghanistan on 9/12 because it was "doable"
     
  5. BenReilly

    BenReilly New Member

    Apr 8, 2002
    Re: Re: Richard Perle

    President Rove :rolleyes:

    Liberals have never figured out how to deal with the "dumb" Republican Presidents (Ike, Reagan, Bush II). Probably because they're far more clever than most Democrats.
     
  6. wu-tang beez

    wu-tang beez New Member

    Apr 19, 2002
    Irving, TX
    Not the Duyba is dumb, he did convert a C avg, a 1200 SAT & the legacy exemption to get into Yale. But Karl Rove devised the Bush win strategy ie. focus on war and massive tax cut and diverting attention away from domestic policy, unemployment, corp fraud, healthcare, etc.

    If the cynical right-wingers did their homework, they'd know this guy was instrumental in dubya's beating a VERY popular Ann Richards by limiting his weaknesses (public statements) and focusing on a simple, repetative message. Then he created a perception of success and helped the hill coat tail the midterm, 3 branch take-over. Karl Rove is his most trusted advisor and what he tells dubya has a far greater chance of becoming policy than what his secretaries give him. Read Boy Genius and take off your blinders.

    But this thread is dedicated to the civilian neoconservative influence in the Pentagon determining foreign policy strategy and how they gained favor after 9/11, not the political strategist that runs the country.
     
  7. wu-tang beez

    wu-tang beez New Member

    Apr 19, 2002
    Irving, TX
    Carter, a 1-term governor, was a nuclear submarine officer and Clinton, politically invisible prior to '92, was a Rhodes Scholar.
     
  8. BenReilly

    BenReilly New Member

    Apr 8, 2002
    It was Bush's discipline that won the election. It's not like Clayton Williams wasn't given similar advice after uttering some of his idioitic comments.

    I'm not discounting Rove's importance, but I'm sick of people underestimating Bush. It's a recipe for failure.
     
  9. BenReilly

    BenReilly New Member

    Apr 8, 2002
    And Bush is far more clever than Carter ever was and has infinitely better judgment.
     
  10. BenReilly

    BenReilly New Member

    Apr 8, 2002
    Clinton is a clever man....and you obviously weren't following politics in 1988.
     
  11. wu-tang beez

    wu-tang beez New Member

    Apr 19, 2002
    Irving, TX
    Re: Re: Richard Perle

    I've been folowing politics closely for as long as I can remember.

    Gore, Tsongus(sp?) & Gephardt were the big names back then.

    I've since learned better than to underestimate the craftiness of the dubya team. I think i actually met Rove once in a local Foley's Dept store when he told me he was going to be the next president. This was the 1st yr of his gubernatorial term and I thought the concept was silly, esp since the Texas Governor has less authority than even the Lt. Governor. He can't even appoint a cabinet. Plus,the Rangers still sucked ;) and continue to do so
     
  12. spejic

    spejic Cautionary example

    Mar 1, 1999
    San Rafael, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Re: Re: Richard Perle

    Before he ran for president, Clinton was known. But for only one thing - delivering a long and boring as hell speech at the Democratic convention.
     
  13. wu-tang beez

    wu-tang beez New Member

    Apr 19, 2002
    Irving, TX
    Re: Re: Re: Richard Perle

    I'm not one for watching those, since they're all show and substance, chicken choking contest. So I missed that speech entirely, but heard about a few yrs ago. When he said, "in conclusion" the audience applauded.
     
  14. BenReilly

    BenReilly New Member

    Apr 8, 2002
    Re: Re: Re: Richard Perle

    And the next day (or so) he was on the Letterman show talking about it.
     
  15. wu-tang beez

    wu-tang beez New Member

    Apr 19, 2002
    Irving, TX
    Back to the thread topic: Richard Perle

    Bill Krystol and another civilian influence in the pentagon Bob Keagan, a neocon, post-cold war columnist, are heads of a group called the Project for a New American Century, which advocates, “to promote democracy in the Arab world as an antidote to radical Islam,” and establishing a Paxamericana to project American influence in the Gulf, are calling for the admin not to punish ‘Old Europe’ and warn against promoting convicted embezzler Ahmed Chalabi for fear of losing credibility. It’s not been a coincidence that Rummy is sounding less cavalier about that lately.

    Bill Krystol was speaking the language of imperialism yesterday on "This Week." He emphasized the importance of remaking Iraq by force if necessary, and deploying that force against Iran if necessary. This seems to be a popular viewpoint, as if the history of Western interference in the Arab world demonstrates the success of using military force to achieve strategic or commercial goals neocons attack cybertron One of the real lessons of Wester...nia) thereby being in contrast to American .
     

Share This Page