Revs 2020-21 Offseason

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by NFLPatriot, Nov 9, 2020.

  1. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    edcrocker repped this.
  2. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  3. eric_appleby

    eric_appleby Member+

    Jun 11, 1999
    Down East
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  4. Feldspar

    Feldspar Member+

    Nov 19, 1998
    Boston, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It’s still not really up to MLS, it’s up to the states. The season is a long way off, pandemicly speaking.
     
    Revs in 2010 and NFLPatriot repped this.
  5. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #280 NFLPatriot, Jan 29, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2021
    The complete list of free agents for the 2021 MLS season
    January 29, 2021
    9:49AM EST
    MLSsoccer staff

    The "Dom Dwyer to New England" rumors seem to have died down.

    Possible backup CB option could be Axel Sjoberg? He had such a great rookie year with Colorado in 2015, but has been injury prone since.

    And of course, who will be Kei Kamara's ninth MLS team? ;)
     
  6. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    No updates on the rumored Icelander?
     
  7. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  8. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    Interesting that he doesn't have a starting spot for Buchanon - which I think is the conventional expectation, barring some surprise.

    Also, the draftees aren't figured in, FWIW.

    Since we have roster spots available, I wonder if training camp (Feb. 22nd!) will have some invitees ...
     
  9. Steve_R

    Steve_R Member

    Feb 25, 2001
    Somerville, MA
    That was my biggest takeaway looking at the lineup chart (/spreadsheet cut & paste haha). It also generated a new thought re: CB cover...if everyone is healthy in the forward and midfield stable, does that leave Buchanon as the starting RB and Bye as cover or slotting in for form issues with Farrell and Kessler?

    We clearly still need more CB cover, but until I saw this depth chart I didn't realize we needed to find a place for Buchanon which likely overlaps with Bye's preferred position.
     
    tsb11 repped this.
  10. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, that was what first jumped out at me also.
     
  11. tsb11

    tsb11 Member+

    United States
    May 31, 2018
    Ive been thinking about Bye as CB cover for a bit now. He is actually good at defending when he is on the back line, and at 5'11 he is small but not too small. Add in his huge hops and he could realistically be in the mix. I think DLG, Verfuth, and Bell (if he signs) are the other guys in contention for CB minutes as the roster stands.

    All that said Id love to see either a clear upgrade at CB or a Jahlil Anibaba type to round out the roster
     
    edcrocker repped this.
  12. Revs in 2010

    Revs in 2010 Member+

    Feb 29, 2000
    Roanoke, VA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #287 Revs in 2010, Feb 4, 2021
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2021
    I agree with much of the sentiment I've seen -- Buchanon is the starting RB in my mind. Not getting him into the 11, would be like not getting a young Clint Dempsey in. After Gil, I think he's the biggest difference maker and disrupter of defenses that we have. Bye as CB, other than in a pinch concerns me, as he is pretty slight of build.

    Also, Polster over Caicedo as the starter????
     
  13. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    Yeah. Don't think so. But, since he's been out for an extended period, he has to show he's fit and recovered.

    I think Polster could also be considered for backup CDEF - he's got the defensive abilities (and size); IMO his weaknesses are speed and lack of agility in open space - factors that are less significant on the back line.
     
  14. Revs in 2010

    Revs in 2010 Member+

    Feb 29, 2000
    Roanoke, VA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Agree on Polster. After the solid start, he dropped off a lot at DMID and I was thinking of this option then.
     
  15. firstshirt

    firstshirt Member+

    Bayern München
    United States
    Mar 1, 2000
    Ellington, CT / NK, RI
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Pretty quiet since the Traustason rumors. Seems like they have room and cap space. Hopefully they are still looking and talking to players. I feel what they did was not enough to make the a contender
     
    A Casual Fan repped this.
  16. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    They allegedly have $2.8 million in TAM, so they better do something.
     
    A Casual Fan repped this.
  17. tsb11

    tsb11 Member+

    United States
    May 31, 2018
    Theyre options are gated by a couple things.

    1) the max non-dp salary charge was $1.6M in 2020. Because all 3 dps make more than that (buksa is $3.25M because of his transfer fee) non can be bought down.

    2) Traustason is a guy who could fit under that $1.6M number, but it might be close. I imagine his salary in MLS would be near if not in excess of the max salary charge (>$612k). If Malmo are holding out for a $1M+ transfer fee, then he suddenly doesnt fit under that budget charge cap and cant be signed.

    3) $1.6M is a decent amount of money to work with for salary+ fee. And if its a mutliyear deal then the fee gets split over the whole term. We dont know what Mafla/Kaptoum's/Turner's new salaries are, but Id be surprised if theyve uaed any of their $4.2Mish xAM

    4) I definitely am getting antsy, and think they need to make another signing. We do have a little time, but its running out.
     
    A Casual Fan and edcrocker repped this.
  18. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Arena, in his post SuperDraft interview, said:
     
  19. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    A Casual Fan repped this.
  20. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  21. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    A Casual Fan and edcrocker repped this.
  22. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Revs can have players report for training camp on March 1st:

     
    A Casual Fan repped this.
  23. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    MLS sets 2021 preseason start dates
    February 13, 2021
    11:00AM EST
    MLSsoccer staff

     
    A Casual Fan repped this.
  24. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The transfer window had supposedly opened, but now it doesn't open until March 10th:

    Official: 2021 MLS Primary Transfer Window dates amended
    February 16, 2021
    1:06PM EST
    MLSsoccer staff

     
  25. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
    Roster still seems a little thin/spotty to me. Not quite the Great Leap Forward roster-wise this year vs. last year from The Bruce that I had been kinda expecting. (Yeah, yada yada pandemic, possible work stoppage was looming etc., yes I get it - but still has some earmarks of "underwhelming" so far, even in light of those environmental difficulties)

    Certainly possible that The Bruce has some big big magic to drop this week, maybe even tomorrow, maybe even next hour - but it is beginning to feel like there is a fair chance that the roster will be more inclined to limp, rather than dash, into training camp.

    Fingers crossed that isn't what happens.

    (And I'm just not ready to hear anyone say "flexibility" as the explanation, even if they think they're speaking truth. That word needs to be mothballed out of the vocab used to talk about the Revs, maybe for as long as a full decade.)
     

Share This Page