Revolution Stadium Groundbreaking "12-24 months" Part XVII

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by patfan1, Feb 17, 2023.

  1. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I used that as my quote in my college year book.
     
    pwykes repped this.
  2. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    25K would be just about right.
     
    Crooked repped this.
  3. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Don't forget paid parking, etc. Agreed ...but give the people what they want.
     
  4. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    25k with the ability to extend it to 30k in the future is ideal. Grass surface, built with acoustics in mind.
     
  5. Coolwhip

    Coolwhip Member

    Jun 27, 2010
    Cambridge, Ma
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Is the idea of everett still alive?
     
  6. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It better be, because I don't think any other option exists.
     
  7. TV on the Radio

    TV on the Radio New Member

    Sep 7, 2016
    Vero Beach, FL
    Club:
    New England Revolution
  8. TV on the Radio

    TV on the Radio New Member

    Sep 7, 2016
    Vero Beach, FL
    Club:
    New England Revolution
  9. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Feldspar repped this.
  10. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So the reporter from Everett committed Libel?

    The Globe article is behind a paywall, but the interesting thing to me from the other articles is that they are talking about the sale of the land. If they are able to work through all the community groups, environmental regs and various power brokers and Kraft does end up buying the parcel, that's a good thing. Word is (or was) that Kraft wanted to own the land (not lease it from someone else) So he could build a similar retail operation like Patriot Place adjacent to the stadium.
     
  11. Feldspar

    Feldspar Member+

    Nov 19, 1998
    Boston, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    ToMhIlL repped this.
  12. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Wow, talk about truth being stranger than fiction...
     
  13. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Since the site is industrial, I doubt there are any community groups too worried about it (famous last words). Dealing with environmental regulations is pretty much standard for building in Massachusetts, so that's baked in. Honestly, my biggest worry is that the Krafts don't know when to say yes.
     
  14. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    I think the biggest issue is political - how to push through a bill to get past the maritime use restrictions (whether that means reforming the whole program or just special-casing this parcel) without making the pols look bad or creating a cabal of other business entities complaining that they didn't get a shot at it.
     
  15. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I don't think that's such a big hurdle if the will is there. Everyone wants to make that area less industrial. I don't think anyone wants a tanker port next to a casino.
     
  16. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    I think the hurdle is how to do it so the politicians don't take a beating over it. Sure, people don't want a tanker port, but once replacing it becomes a viable option, everyone and their brother will have some preferred us for the site. And then there's the fact that other developers would feel like they should have a shot at that site.

    I think this will require special legislation that favors the Kraft project, but no one will want it to look that way.
     
  17. BostonRed

    BostonRed Member+

    Oct 9, 2011
    Somerville, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The NWSL has officially approved the Boston franchise. They may be able to throw some clout (one of the owners is the daughter of the Celts owner) into the mix.

    It also adds a potential tenant to make the finances work.
     
    edcrocker repped this.
  18. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Doesn't Wynn own the property? Nothing is going there if they don't want it.
     
  19. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    From what I've heard, Wynn is willing to lease the land and Kraft wants to buy it.
     
  20. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    Well, with Bilello on it I'm sure they'll get that worked out ... :laugh:
     
    Brian in Boston repped this.
  21. Tea Men Tom

    Tea Men Tom Member

    Feb 14, 2001
    If I'm not mistaken a company called Realty Income (a real estate investment trust - publicly traded company) bought the property and is currently leasing it back to Wynn. If this land is included, then I'm sure that if the Krafts are willing to pay fair value for the land, they can buy it - pending of course working out all the environmental stuff.
     
  22. Minutemanii

    Minutemanii Member+

    Dec 29, 2005
    Abington MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    A little off topic but still, I say, until the F.O. is transparent on the truth of the Bruce debacle, in my mind, Bilello is responsible for losing him.
     
    Brian in Boston repped this.
  23. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Again, I like him personally, but he's been absolutely allowed to skate. No media pressure, not many calling for his job. It's a master-class in accomplishing little (since the stadium is a huge component of his job) but getting paid a lot for it. He failed at his hires with Burns, Heaps and Friedel. And I'll need to see proof that he had anything to do with Arena being brought in. I'm guaranteeing that was a conversation between Bruce and the Krafts.
     
  24. Minutemanii

    Minutemanii Member+

    Dec 29, 2005
    Abington MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Agreed. I've met him personally on several occasions. I even had a long conversation with him once as he pulled up a barstool next to me at the Banshee. Super nice guy,
     
  25. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    More on this:
    NWSL set for return to Boston
    By Rob Ridley
    20 September 2023
    thestadiumbusiness.com

     
    edcrocker repped this.

Share This Page