Rev News 2/23

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by ProseLtd, Feb 23, 2003.

  1. ProseLtd

    ProseLtd Member

    Jul 27, 1999
    Shrewsbury, MA USA
  2. Rev-eler

    Rev-eler Member

    Feb 13, 2000
    San Francisco
    Buell-appa?....Buell-appa?....anyone seen Buell-appa?...anyone?.....anyone?
     
  3. Kenp

    Kenp BigSoccer Supporter

    Feb 17, 1999
    Massachusetts
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    It ain't necessarily Frank's fault

    While recent columns from both scribes couldn't contrast the quality difference between Gus and Frank more, the quantity is not really under Frank's control. This is usually a Globe editorial decision.

    I can't understand it. They have a reporter on the spot, yet there's no coverage when they have the space- Sports Extra on Friday and the Sunday section. In addition to "Soccer Tuesday" and an occasional other weekday article, we'll probably end up with one good sized story on page 1 of the sports section the day before the season opens, along with a few sidebar columns inside.

    Makes you wonder though, whether Frank is down there at his own expense, - i.e., a "working vacation".
     
  4. soccerfan

    soccerfan BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 13, 1999
    New Jersey
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    whatever happend to Jurgen Sommer?
     
  5. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    released
     
  6. Jon Martin

    Jon Martin Member+

    Apr 25, 2000
    SE Mass
    From the Martins article Tornberg & Co. kick it around:

    "At the same time, they are interested in learning more about the ways we market our teams in the United States. They want to find the relationship between ownership, management, fans, sponsors, employees and game staffing."

    They may be less interested in Revs marketing ideas when they learn that the Revs plan to voluntarily play the home leg of a home-and-away series in the away team's stadium.
     
  7. moacir

    moacir New Member

    Feb 16, 1999
    Figueira da Foz, PT
    $$

    Sometimes it is a business decision. One team may offer $25,000 to change the venue and if you think that is 2.5x your predicted gate receipt, it makes financial sense but sucks for the fans.
     
  8. mosler

    mosler Member

    Jan 2, 2003
    Mashpee, MA
    $$

    It would be really disgusting if the brass took this mindset. I think a rough model of long term success in the league runs something like this:

    1 domestic talent --- stadiums --- marketing

    / improved level of play
    2 - increased prestige of league
    \ more fans in seats

    3 increased investment/marketing/ad. revenue

    4 promised land!

    (can you tell I don't have an MBA? :))

    They must agree that showing well at an international tournament is an important part of step 2 and would take precedent over selling your team out to make a buck.
     
  9. MrSangster

    MrSangster Member

    Feb 16, 1999
    Duxbury,MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  10. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    Re: $$

    On the other side of the coin,

    1) the team and the league have been bleeding $$ for 6-7 years now!

    2) outside of us "hard-core", no one else even knows that there is a Concacaf Champions Cup, or would care if they did!

    Yes, things like prestige and credibility are worthy goals, but when you've been losing money steadily, they're not likely to be among the top priorities (unfortunately).
     

Share This Page