If this is right and no one changes their vote, a vote to release the files may happen in late September or early October We’re now just one vote away from hitting 218 signatures on the discharge petition on the release of the Epstein files.Adelita Grijalva — the Democrat running in safely blue AZ-07 in a September 23 special election — will be the clinching vote.It’s only a matter of time. https://t.co/FW1VyRjqPn— Adam Carlson (@admcrlsn) September 10, 2025
Don't be surprised if the movers and shakers of conservatism are scrubbed from the files when they're finally released
I can't believe half of the country is really going to believe that a letter found in a book taken in an FBI raid with a bunch of damning statements that implicate people just as rich and powerful can't be real because of a signature. But they will believe it to be fake. Absolutely insane. EDIT: Link and Bill Clinton detail removed I saw the mod request
They probably tried. But there's so much and so many have seen it. I think that's why they promised and then delayed - it turned out they couldn't do it. They don't even have a narrative to explain it. They are only hoping it all goes away.
Why is anyone surprised at this? You had to be willfully ignorant not to know. The earliest reports about Epstein's serial predator behavior actually date back to a 1996 F.B.I. (Maria Farmer). Bill Clinton socialized with the guy a lot after his presidency, you don't think the secret service reported upon this investigation as well as the 2005 Palm Beach P.D. investigation? They do extensive background checks for anyone who comes into close contact with their charges. I'm shocked that people are shocked at the content of that book.
It was a mod-light request. I'm not a mod in these parts, but as a former teacher, I know how things like this can cause all kinds of unintended problems. And if you are posting the letter from Clinton, I've seen that and it is not as bad as the Trump drawing.
That drawing of Epstein giving a bunch to balloons to little girls and then getting massaged by them a few years later is seriously ********ed up. What a bunch of sick bastards.
The point of posting it is if MAGA actually evaluated where the letter came from and the rest of the book they would realize that questioning its authenticity based on whether it was his signature is just the flimsiest of lies that doesn't hold up at all. I think this just is further proof that we've been in a Civil War and the battle is over actual reality and what objective truth is allowed. There are plenty of philosophers who would be fascinated by what's going on in America right now on the idea of Truth.
Is wanting to post it. There is no need since we all have the internet. Based on James' comment, I went googling. It was easy to find, unfortunately. We are not MAGA (as far as I know). The posting of the material should be separated out from the posting of how MAGA is denying this stuff. I don't disagree that we have been in a low level, information Civil War. We are progressing more assuredly into the active, physical aspect (though some will argue that we have been in the active stage for years).
I don’t think I’ve ever posted anything positive about Chuck Schumer. But credit were credit is due https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/10/congress/chuck-schumer-senate-epstein-vote-00555454 Schumer introduced an Epstein file release amendment to a defense bill…forcing a senate vote. Well done Chuck. Something about a stopped clock…..
Maybe it was her who drew it. But yeah, of course it matters. It portrays Epstein as a groomer. Whoever drew it was aware of it .. so yeah, it matters.
Totally not the context I was thinking when I read your comment. I was thinking you were insinuating that we had no idea if Epstein Mae the drawing so we can’t call foul. I agree….yes…it matters. My bad.
When the list is released and there are mover and shaker conservatives missing, I hope you'll rep my post instead of saying that there may be some who aren't in the Epstein Island Club.
Sure, but you have to answer the questions 1) If it's so easy, why haven't they done it by now? and 2) Why did they go from being gung ho about releasing it to avoiding the subject and doing head fakes with releases of already known stuff?
They may yet BE doing it. Still trying it as they stall. Because they've discovered some names on the list who are more powerful than they really wanna ******** with? Men who may not even be citizens? Possibly English "royals", Eastern European zillionaires... This shit could literally lead to (more) international conflicts. And the info was not available to the GOP as a group for a while, you know. Anyhow, you show me a conservative who would not stick his dick in a child, and I'll show you a conservative woman (because she has no dick to stick into anyone). And I'm about this )( far from saying, "has not stuck". That's who we're dealing with. Spejic... the only other option, really, is that they ain't involved if they're not on the list. IOW, every guilty party is on the list. If you believe that, I don't feel that I have to answer anything.
Count it, and one … “The British government announced on Thursday that it had fired its ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, after a flurry of emails and other correspondence painted a vivid portrait of his close ties to the financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.” “Peter Mandelson’s suggestion that Jeffrey Epstein’s first conviction was wrongful and should be challenged is new information,” the statement said. “In light of that, and mindful of the victims of Epstein’s crimes, he has been withdrawn as ambassador with immediate effect.” More from The NY Times … More on the Jeffrey Epstein Case House Vote Nears Success: Supporters are on the brink of collecting the 218 signatures to proceed with releasing files related to the Epstein case, but House Republican leaders and the White House are trying to stop it. What Note? The Republican response to the release of a suggestive note to Jeffrey Epstein apparently signed by President Trump followed a familiar pattern of deflection. JPMorgan: A Times investigation found that America’s leading bank spent years supporting — and profiting from — Epstein, ignoring red flags, suspicious activity and concerned executives. G.O.P. Women: The Republican rift over whether to demand greater transparency in the case has highlighted a gender divide in the male-dominated party, with several women breaking with Trump.
The best part of this joke is I don’t know if it’s a joke. The worst part is the subject matter of course
Yeah, was wondering about that, too. Considering that giving balloons appears not to be the only "giving" in that picture. And Epstein looks happy.
Lol After centuries of gleefully celebrating the first cycle so that they could marry Dahmer Kyle, Scottsboro Becky decides Epstein is a bridge too far???? Why cain't Millennial Fancy have her one chaince, Becky? H'it was good enough fer yewww...