Because they run the show over there. The underdog is given a little more liberty in their actions. It's not fair, but that's how it goes. I'm just saying that your debate in this thread is going into the flaming region. Try to keep it to facts and witty repartee
Yes, and did they "run the show" in 1967 and 1974, before the bomb, before the US support, invaded from all sides by a horde of maniacs outnumbering them whothehellknowshowmany-to-one? Who was the underdog then? But oh how quick was the UN to pass the "Zionism is Fascism" resolution! But I am not sophisticated enough for this. I am not even sure what a repatriant is. Unless it's me.
It's not a novel concept: people fighting over land, you know. Folks should know when they are defeated. Israel, BTW, is the only side who has ever shown any inclination to make the steps towards peace. But every time Israel makes a consession, Arabs erect a rocket launcher on it. How does it end? Maybe, when terrorism becomes unprofitable. There are too many mudderfeckers there who don't want peace. Being a militant is the only job they want.
Yes, Death got him in the end. But the Jews are currently undefeated. Did you see the bracket? Philistines, Romans, Inquisitors, Cossacks, Nazis... All dead now. I think we are in the Final Four and you would be pretty ill advised to bet against us in your office pool the rest of the way.
America has actually made the Arab-Israeli conflict less bloody since heavily supporting Israel (along with some Arab states) in the 70s. Israel was attacked by an army on its border that is determined to wipe Israel off the map and is armed by a soon to be nuclear power that is even more determined to finish Hitler's work. This is simply intolerable.
Just because the English are quick to forget what happened in their "Underground" and don't whipe a horde of marching Muslims off their streets like we know they can (oh, but the fans of Liverpool are so much more deserving the wrath, aren't they?), doesn't mean the US should side with terrorists too. The rest of the world can go and screw itself. It's not like it has a great track record on the Jew question.
But many countries support (even if it is by silence) Israel's attacks on Hezbollah (in Lebanon). These attacks started as a result of Hezbollah crossing the border, killing eight and kidnapping two Israeli soldiers. This might be a technically (is it for Lebanese), but Israel is attacking Hezbollah, not Lebanon. If UN resolution 1559 was implemented this would never have happened.
It's nice to hear from real Iranians. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/23/w...&en=70e1c0cde0073ad9&ei=5094&partner=homepage
2 lebanese soldiers who were wounded during the bombing of their barracks died today. Israeli helicopters attacked the cars of Al Arabiya, AL Jazeera and Al Manar (hezbollah tv) journalists even though the cars were marked with a big TV - s. lebanon. No wounded. A hezbollah rocket wounded 4 ppl (1 seriously) in Safed. All of them were members of the same family. 15 french were wounded (1 seriously) under the bombings in Junieh, lebanon. King of Jordan Abdallah asks for a ceasefire and an end of the israeli military escalation. Syria is ready to discuss the crisis with the US. The israeli troops took control of Maroun al-Ras, S. lebanon which is considered a strategic village. Gen. Benny Gantz confirmed the news. 3 israeli tanks were hit in a hill near Maroun al-Ras. Hezbollah say they hit an israeli tank and the crew is either wounded or dead at 6 p.m. local time, and that they are rejecting the attacks of the tanks in the centre of the village. Either these 2 news have been done at different times or there's some propagnda involved. I tend to believe the official statement of an israeli general more. Repubblica.it
Maroun al-Ras is taken. Operation Whoopass is nicely underway. Oh, the Israeli war crimes! Dozens of Heezboolahs are reportedly snuffed out in the primes of their lives by bloodthirsty Jewish commandos. Warm up the virgins! Sheik She Shat Herself is coming soon. "Jewish commandos"... Man, I almost get a woody by just saying that.
This story about 72 virgins is all a result of misunderstanding. It is really a 72 years old virgin and no where does it say it has to be a female...
No, really, what is the deal with those virgins? Do they ever run out? And will She Shat Herself get better virgins than the regular cannon fodder? It's a fascinating subject, you know.