The tweet threads were created long before the loading issues of the past couple of years. But that is another reason to try and silo tweets into that thread.
It's iterally 20-30 SD tweet droppings in a row with maybe a few others. My insanely original memes/blueskies will get lost in that hellthread. Edit - 23 in a row from 9 PM to midnight yesterday
******** you Tim Scott...... “Praying it was fake because it’s the most racist thing I’ve seen out of this White House. The President should remove it.” — Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), quoted by the Wall Street Journal, on a video President Trump posted depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as apes.
"He speaks for me!No one else ever did!" -People who really aren't fascists or racists and how dare you say they are!
I'm jealous of great athletes doing great things. More in awe really. Same with actors, humanitarians, musicians, people who live great lives despite the odds, etc. Not jealous of the superdaves of the world. Sorry.
New conspiracy theory - Trump is making sure to hit certain words and phrases because there is massive betting on Polymarket on what Trump will say. Trump Jr is on the board of Polymarket and one of the initial investors, so he knows better than anyone that insider information means massive wins.
So, like the baseball scandal with pitchers in cahoots with gamblers…but with the fate of the free world and American democracy at stake. Awesome.
I really don't care what you find "whenever" you amble off on a finding mission.... This particular excerpt in your ongoing state of the analysis whenever is incorrect - and therefore invalidates the fullness of the term "whenever" insofar as this instance is concerned. Look -I am not an expert on VAR. I simply (wrongly or rightly) DID take/took it to be the situation that there is perhaps sometimes two or more VAR folks. This or these overseen also by another VAR ref in a room elsewhere. Turns out I am correct. Hence "they" not "he" I don;t need to face anything - except common-sense. This should be bleedin' obvious- but I'll state it anyway. Why in God's name would I ever refer to a single shooter (if I was only referencing him) as they? This (er) debate begins with my basically stating that I do not care for the usage of the psychological term "they" by those who choose to use it to instantiate as a representation of dual personal identification, because then the numerological term "they", with reference to objective reality and objective language for recording event participation becomes distorted and more difficult to work clearly with in recorded language. A new term, as somebody recently suggested to me, is required here IMO. Back to the 2nd peurile attempt to put words and meanings in my mouth- There were more individuals than the shooter involved in the attempt to make Renee Good exit her vehicle. Hence "they" got referenced in a post responding to a remark about one of them. Not because I use they to mean any single one of them individually. This might not pass muster on a PHD thesis for philosophy, but I think on a message board the average user is able to get the basic inference that I was also referring to the whole sick pack of 'em, without descending into some semi-deranged theorizing that the post was in fact really about my loosed moorings of what I see as the difference between plural things and singular things. Again......
well, it's been awhile, but The idea that meanings themselves don;t have any real grounded reality. To an extent that everything is in the eye of the observer, and as such, any pronouncement is a truth that deserves as much consideration as any other.
I guess they'll also be changing the listening cassette from the Bob Dylan tune to something more Kid Rock groovy...
Would you think Trump would say "six-seven"? He did last Saturday. And yes this was bettable on Polymarket. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ughing-what-is-this/articleshow/126333782.cms
You might as well have said back in the 90s - why doesn't he just go to a barber instead of generating that nonsensical comb-over?
New thread https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/trump-the-cognitive-slip-continues.2137824/ (Sorry, @Val, to pre-emptively close this thread.)