We are neither. We are Canada. We hate to admit it because it's not true. Americans don't celebrate Canada Day, Victoria Day or Boxing Day. Most of the holidays we share with the US we share with many other countries around the world too. And if our dialect is the same, I don't understand why so many Americans I've met like poking fun at Canadian accents. We share alot in common with both the US and Britain (and Australia and New Zealand as well), but in the end, we are not America Jr, we are not British North America. We are Canada.
Though we are inundated by the American cultural and economic hegemony, so in that sense we are America Jr.
Really? We watch their TV, have all of their franchises, and even consider their car manufacturers to be domestic?? We just put scanners in our airports because? the US recommended it. Oh and we waited on Obama to decide on when we were going to bail out the US companies located in Canada. But you are right in that we have different holidays, but then agains so do most provinces.
So is pretty much every other country on the planet. Except Cuba. Actually, I watched a program some time ago where different networks around the world did a journalistic piece on their relationship with America, and it was interesting to hear so many of them describe themselves as the 51st state, including Britain, France, Japan, Poland and Israel to name a few. I mean, yes we share alot in common with the US, but we are not the US in the same sense that Ireland is not Britain, Austria is not Germany or New Zealand is not Australia.
So does every other country in the world. They all watch Hollywood films as well. Not all. I've never seen JC Penny, Bob Evans, Barns and Noble, Chilis, IHOP, to name a few, up here. I've never seen the Bay, Canadian Tire, Harvey's or Indigo down there either. As for the ones we do have up here, most of them operate worldwide as well. I've eaten at McDonald's in Paris, Burger King in Amsterdam, Subway in Korea, shopped at Toys'r'us in Barcelona and Wal Mart in Shanghai. Only because many of them are built here. Hondas and Toyotas are domestics as well. Yes, and we did it after Britain, France and several other NATO countries did so. Again, economic policy makers worldwide always keep an eye on what the US does before making their own moves. By these arguments, pretty much every country in the world is America Jr.
I wear a redcoat, mostly at road games. Someone a couple of years ago suggested redcoats as the name of the traveling supporters. I kinda liked the idea, so much so that I now have a banner that reads "The Redcoats are here". There are a few people wearing them, just as there are some who wear luchador masks, bring drums, and everything else. The team nickname stands and I can appreciate that. Whether redcoats is used by anybody formally or not, who really cares. A nickname is just that - a nickname. I like the idea of having a name for the traveling supporters, something that just kinda fits with the whole NE Revolution thing (redcoats v the minutemen!), has a military feel and is easily recognizable as Canadian (check the colour of the Mounties' coats as well as those of the Canadian military for years!). And it is not tied to any one supporters group - it just is. Use it or not, it's just a nickname that has some degree of recognition.
True, though think we can make a case that Canada moved from a British sphere of influence to more of an American sphere of influence as the balance of world power shifted towards the Americans, particularly after the second world war. Though we manage to retain far more British influence in our legal, government, military, and language (provincial Norman French in the case of Quebec) and tend to have a far more American influence on our recent culture and economic situation, this reflects the status quo at the time of their relative inceptions, particularly our culture and economy reflect current American trends as they are more fleeting than the British influences. So from a military stand point, the use of redcoats as a team nickname reflects a Canadian institution of British influence, which is fine if you want to dip into military history for rivalries with some American teams. But since the current team is so recent, and doesn't really reflect any of the prior incarnations of association football teams in Toronto -- nobody is suggesting nicknames reflecting prior Croatian or Scottish teams, though a few do like the latter NASL incarnation -- a nickname hearkening back to the wars during Canadian colonial period is unlikely to be met with much success either. The generic Reds was bound to win out because few fans wish to associate a sports team with the military when Canada, as an independent nation, never fought against the Americans, especially when we have a whole host of sporting rivalries with American teams in various sports that provide a whole host of more recent fodder than the war of 1912 or the American War of Independence do. For those of us that choose to identify with our British military history, great, but as we see every offseason it's tough to convince many Torontonians of non-British ancestry to get behind the idea, because it doesn't really reflect their Canada. This is exactly what makes sense, redcoats as one of a bunch of identities and works well for the situation you describe.
Except they (the other countries) don't have an inferiority complex that makes them tell every American that that is a Canadian beer their drinking. We have to go out of our way to let Americans know that the comedian on whatever program they are watching is actually Canadian. I went to school in the states, if I told them I was from Vermont or Connecticut they wouldn't be able to tell. Here is one for you, I was in Baltimore in October and the guy asked me what food is Toronto known for???? He elaborated by telling me how Maryland crabs are a Baltimore thing and cheesesteaks from Philly etc...So what is it in our rich culture that distinguishes us as a city from American Jr.??? Oh ya we are mutlicultural and diverse and have food from all over the world, like New York and Chicago. Or is it that we are still attached to the monarchy that makes us different?? Everything about our lifestyle here in Toronto, especially in the last 20 years is America Jr.
Well, I certainly agree with this. To argue otherwise would be dumb. Just saying that there's more to us than the whole America Jr thing. Doesn't mean we don't have alot in common with the US, we do, but we still retain some similarities to Britain, and there's alot about Canada that is simply and uniquely Canadian. And well, I'm not of British heritage but the fact is that our history is deeply intertwined with Britain, who settled this country (well, invaded, pillaged, then settled... but I digress). We've grown beyond our British North America way of being, as have countries like Aus and NZ, but historical fact is historical fact. We can't ignore history just because our world has changed.
Acutally, they do. If you don't see what makes Canada unique, that's fine. But many people do. I've been to New York and Chicago. Toronto is not New York or Chicago. Go to either of those cities and tell them how much we are like them and watch them laugh. I can name at least 100 cities around the world that have no unique cuisine, I don't see why that matters.
You're just not looking. The bay was owned by a US company for a few years, Federated Stores. Canadian Tire has twice tried to break into the US market, once as "White Stores". The store concept and name just didn't resonate with people in the US. Other "Canadian" companies - Tim Hortons, M&M Foods and others have worked hard to generate US presences, some with the Canadian name (Timmys) and some otherwise (M&M's has a completely different name in their operations in Wisconsin and Illinois). Harveys is part of Cara Foods and to the best of my knowledge has never looked south. But Indigo competes directly with some of the US companies, head to head over the web. Key competitor - Amazon!
wow I threw some shit in the fan with that america JR comment... jeez.. who knew... still I stand by it... think about how easy it is to go to any bar and order a coors light, MGD, etc... Nobody's talking about the fourune 500s (walmart, mcdick's, budweiser, marlboro) I'm talking about the Quizno's, dairy queens, even the 7-11s... starbucks... IMO the CFL is a great example of america JR...
Hold the phone, just because we don't have a specific unique food, or lifestyle we're America Jr. That's a lovely strawman you've built there. The fact that we've been inundated by the modern culture and lifestyle reflects our status as a first world country, not our Americnanness. And why the arbitrary limitation to the last 20 years, most of the Canadian cultural hallmarks predate that period (hockey, CFL, accent etc.), you can say the same things about any major Canadian city, or cities like London and Sydney, so what? Of course, the point is we're a modern international city that was a provincial backwater during the majority of the British colonial period, that has relied on a steady stream of immigrants to increase our population and stature as a world city, the bulk of whom identify as Canadians of whatever non-British origin. Our British history is a fact, but isn't really useful in a modern context, it's not that it's ignored, (give someone directions, or pay cash for goods and our British roots show easily) it's that for the majority it's irrelevant. Like most of the other members of the commonwealth, we've moved on. Using corporate examples is great and all, but I can counter with our banks, hospitals/health care and government for distinctly Canadian institutions, we have our big corporations like RIM and Bombardier that are Canadian multinationals too, The NHL and companies like Tim Hortons (sigh) have done the same in the U.S. Your CFL characterization is interesting though, it's one of the truly unique Canadian things out there that has little or no American influence on it (besides the fact that Americans play it here), both forms of gridiron evolved independently of each other from rugby reflective of local rules played during one home and home series between McGill and Harvard - if you meant junior to be evolved similarly in parallel I guess that makes sense, but that's not how I interpret it.
So you used hockey and football to illustrate Canadian cultural hallmarks?? Because hockey wasn't played in Detroit, Chicago, Boston and New York?? CFL, right, if anything your examples are good indicators as to how we are much more similar to Americans than Europeans. Why get testy, it is okay if we are American Jr's. We always feel the need to tell everybody about our great Canadian culture, but in fact there isn't much of one, besides people coming over for economic prosperity.
Not meaning to be testy, just felt like some debate this afternoon. Of course we're similar to Americans, they're right next door and we're huddled on the property line, maybe I'm just feeling the classic Canadian inferiority complex (and good luck finding an American with one of those). The reality is we have very similar histories and origins, we both started out as English colonies with some French ones thrown in, we both decimated local populations, we both grew via immigration, we both have created a type of gridiron football based on rugby. But we weren't founded by a revolutionary war, we didn't get rid of the bulk of our British military/legal institutions, we have embraced a more European social democratic system (thank you Quebec), and those subtle differences are what makes us Canadian, as least much as poutine, maple syrup, rye whiskey and bloody caesars.
I seriously threw this thread off course today, my apologies to everyone. I'll stop here, back to my very beautiful, very unique country of Canada.
Well, I did too. But it's the off season and this stuff comes up like clockwork this time of year (not that there's anything wrong with it), so having a place for it works for me. Anyway, I love the irony that this happened on an American site, but I digress (even further). Up the redcoats!
this is something thats truly canadian... On the internet... a heartfelt debate, and in the end everyone apologizing... Oh Canada.. thats something typically canada is known for... politeness, ice, maple syrup and back bacon (in brazil its called canadian loin)...
After all this heated debate and then heart felt apologies, whether you like Redcoats or not, or think Canada is US Jr., UK Jr., or distinctly its own, we can all come together as Canadians and Torontonians (or in my case an Ontarian who has an affinity for Toronto sports teams) and thank the heavens that our team is not officially named the Wiz...period.
The 200th anniversary of the war of 1812 is only 2 short years away. The Redcoats name will get some traction because of the anniversary. The Phily team with the SOB (Sons of Ben supporters) will give us the Redcoat treatment. There is a strong Revolutionary trend in the North Eastern US Team identities, so it's bound to happen. The CHIVAS team are known as the Goats, not of choice, but because of other team rivalries. Reds is legit nickname, but it is truly generic. I would resist Tories, that would be a true turnoff.. (regardless if I support them or not).
I kind of like Philly's nickname...zolo's... maybe we can get something "organic" if we pay Toronto media to screw up for us... As for "Red Army", I like it but it sounds more like a nickname for the fans (i.e. Tartan army) I don't really care too much about Reds vs. Redcoats but redcoats does feel a little contrived to me. A rivalry shouldn't be based nicknames... I don't "hate" Ottawa because Senators and Maple Leafs have had it in for each other since before the Roman Empire and I don't "hate" them because of their stupid looking centurion logo... I "hate" them because they just suck in general
FYI.. in europe, and in south america most clubs are athletic clubs... so if I'm not mistaken they compete in professional basketball, Volleyball, Athletics, Boxing and other sports... so.. following that logic we should be called The Toronto Maple Leafs, so should the raptors, and the marlies should be the Leafs B