Rank the 32 team by performance

Discussion in 'World Cup 2010: General' started by Excape Goat, Jul 8, 2010.

  1. mgvillablanca

    mgvillablanca New Member

    Jul 15, 2010

    Argentina and Brazil over Uruguay, you are kidding right? The players of those two teams played as if they couldn't wait to go on vacation. Uruguayans played as if their lives were at stake.
     
  2. Excape Goat

    Excape Goat Member+

    Mar 18, 1999
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Which game did the Brazilians and Argentinians play as if they couldn't wait on vacation. A lot of team played as if their lives are at stake. Certainly, Brazil played liked their lives are at stake against Holland after going behind 2-1. Argentina was playing liked this when they were only 1 down agains Germany. Brazil might look liked they are on vocation in other times because they were in control throughout the tournament. They looked relaxed.

    If you think that way, you must rank South Africa and North Korea as your top team, right?
     
  3. RacMan93

    RacMan93 Member

    Jul 15, 2010
    Montreal
    Club:
    FC Bayern München
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    1. germany
    2. hooland
    3. uruguay
    4. spain
    5. brazil
    6. argetina
    7. ghana
    8. paraquay
    9. usa
    10. portugal
     
  4. mgvillablanca

    mgvillablanca New Member

    Jul 15, 2010
    And that's exactly why they were kicked out early in the competition. Their illegal goals with the complicity of the referee didn't help them much now, did it?
     
  5. sinner78

    sinner78 BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 7, 2001
    Thats a generous review of Argentina's world cup.
    They did what they always do..
    Look "spectacular" against 3rd/4th string teams .
    Benefit from crap officiating in the 2nd round and then get blown out in the QF .
    The first team who could expose their poor fullbacks ended it all. Maradona is a poor coach who isnt interested in small tactical details. Hence them having a nightmare in the qualifying rounds.
     
  6. JAVez1983

    JAVez1983 Member

    Sep 2, 2008
    Tampa
    Club:
    Fulham FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    1. Spain
    2. Netherlands (I can't separate the two, but Holland did make the final)
    2. Brazil

    3. Germany
    4. Argentina
    5. Chile
    6. Ghana
    7. USA (with the right calls we could have had more energy and gotten past Ghana and maybe even Uru...oh what could have been...)
    8. Mexico
    9. Japan
    10. Paraguay
    11. Uruguay (i tried to like them until the suarez fiasco, but wasn't impressed, but Forlan is just awesome!)
    12. Slovakia
    13. Ivory Coast
    14. England
    15. Portugal
    16. South Korea
    17. Serbia
    18. South Africa
    19. Cameroon
    20. Denmark
    21. Australia
    22. Slovenia
    23. Nigeria
    24. New Zealand
    25. Greece
    26. Italy
    27. Algeria
    28. Honduras
    29. France
    30. North Korea (managed to take it to Brazil without playing scared)
    31. Switzerland (meh, ultra defensive, scared tactics)
     
  7. NJDevils1087

    NJDevils1087 Member

    Jun 25, 2010
    Arlington, VA
    Club:
    Wigan Athletic FC
    LOL you can't possibly put the only team to beat the Champions dead last.
    There's a difference between playing scared and playing to your strengths (counter attacking vs head on play -- evidenced by the Honduras match).

    Don't understand what the huge issue is amongst the BS user base against defense-first football. :/
     
  8. helloeveryonelll

    helloeveryonelll New Member

    May 19, 2010
    1. Spain
    2. Germany
    3. Holland
    4. Brazil

    5. Uruguay
    6. Paraguay
    7. Ghana
    8. Argentina
    9. Chile
    10. Portugal
    11. Japan
    12. Korea Rep
    13. England
    14. Mexico
    15. USA

    16. Australia
    17. Switzerland
    18. Slovakia
    19. Denmark
    20 Serbia
    21. Nigeria
    22. Ivory Coast
    23. New Zealand
    24. South Africa
    25. Cameroon
    26. Honduras
    27. Slovenia
    28. France
    29. Italy
    30. Greece
    31. Algeria
    32. North Korea
     
  9. induswebi

    induswebi New Member

    Jun 8, 2010
    I think this is the right list according to performance....

    1 Spain (Not as impressing as in the EURO throughout the tournament, but proved themselves vs Germany)
    2 Germany (Arguably, they lost their composure a bit vs Spain, but I really think the loss had more to do with Spain just being better)
    3 Netherlands (Not that convincing, actually, but solid in defense and had more to show in attack than eg Uruguay)
    4 Brazil (Always did just enough, you always thought they could do more, but in the end, they proved they couldn't)
    5 Uruguay (great Forlan, impressive performance in defense)
    6 Argentina
    7 Ghana (yes, their finishing was horrible, but otherwise, one of the most well rounded teams of this tournament)
    8 Chile (might be a bit overrated, they choked vs Brazil, but in gs, impressive pressing all over the pitch. And not "no defense")
    9 Mexico
    10 Paraguay
    11 USA
    12 South Korea
    13 England
    14 Portugal
    15 Switzerland
    16 Japan
    17 Ivory Coast
    18 Australia
    19 Serbia
    20 Slovakia
    21 Denmark
    22 South Africa
    23 Slovenia
    24 New Zealand
    25 Greece
    26 Italy
    27 Cameroon (showed some quality vs Denmark, one of the most entertaining gs matches)
    28 Nigeria
    29 Honduras
    30 Algeria
    31 North Korea
    32 France
     
  10. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    I tend to agree. Not only that but Holland was the only team to win their first 6 games while Germany lost twice out of 6 at the time that this thread was opened. How is 18 points worse than 12 points? Especially considering Germany lost so convincingly against Spain, despite the flattering scoreline.

    So its not even a question: 1) Spain, 2) Holland, <gap> 3) Germany, 4) Uruguay. After that its a bit debatable, but I would put Paraguay 5th considering they came the closest to eliminating the eventual champs, Spain, in the KO rounds.
     
  11. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    What about the Serbia performance? :eek:
     
  12. Dage

    Dage Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2008
    Berlin
    Club:
    Borussia Mönchengladbach
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    With the German path, the Netherlands may not reached the Quarters..

    They domianted them with 1 player less and should at least draw them. All in all the match was decided by the terrible ref. Nothing really you can bash the German team about.
     
  13. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    Oh please. Slovakia was playing better than England at the time Holland beat them. Prior to the start of the KO rounds, Brazil was most people's favorites and Holland beat them too. Their last 2 opponents (URU, ESP) were the same as Germany's.

    If you're gonna talk about the ref, what about Lampard's goal? lol
     
  14. Dage

    Dage Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2008
    Berlin
    Club:
    Borussia Mönchengladbach
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    I didn't know Lampard has palyed for Serbia. :ugly:
     
  15. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    I didn't say that he did. I just get the feeling most people rank Germany #1 or #2 in this thread because of some of the margins of victories they had, when clearly one blowout would never have happened if not for one of the worst calls of the tournament going in Germany's favor. :cool:
     
  16. 621380

    621380 Member

    Feb 21, 2004
    germany
    the best scorer for germany thomas müller picked up a garbage yellow card against argentina and didnt play against spain...we dont know the outcome team germany with müller in the team against spain ...pure speculation...but nobody can deny müller has contributed for 9 of germanys 16 goals and was definitiv one of keyplayer in the offensive..

    why you dont mention this fact??
     
  17. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    We could go through these hypothetical scenarios all day. "If Germany had Holland's draw, they maybe don't even reach the semis."
     
  18. poorvi

    poorvi Member+

    Feb 5, 2006
    Bombay
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    ^^^^
    Thats true. No point hypothesizing. But what is happening is that you are penalizing Germany for what was a refereeing error. Why should Germany's overall ranking here (perceived albeit) take a hit for a mistake that the referee made? The fact that the referee made that error does not change their performance and attitude in face of stronger ( at least on paper) opposition. IMO, they are in the top 3 teams in the tournament and they finished 3rd, which is just about fair.
     
  19. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    I'm not penalizing them. I'm just not rewarding them because they were an unfancied, young side. We're not ranking the most overachieving/surprising sides here. Looking at it objectively, there's no-way they can be rated top 2.
     
  20. 621380

    621380 Member

    Feb 21, 2004
    germany

    you suggest a blowout win for germany isnt possible with a 2:2 draw against england......this is a hypotetic scenario too....we dont know...however the referee did one big error in this game and germany with a 2:1 lead scored 2 more goals....this is a fact too...germany didnt win 2:1 ...
     
  21. Dage

    Dage Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2008
    Berlin
    Club:
    Borussia Mönchengladbach
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    You're a troll.
     
  22. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    I guess that's true, depending how you define "blowout". Germany could've won 7-2 if that goal by Lampard was given. Not likely, but possible.
     
  23. K:thecore

    K:thecore Member+

    May 20, 2002
    Honolulu
    Club:
    Arsenal FC

    Maybe top 10 is a bit of a stretch for S. Korea but then again I dont really believe it matters past the top 5 (perhaps even up to top 8 at most) because the dropoff in quality from that point on is really almost exponential. Spain German Dutch Netherlands Argentina Italy...these are teams that are just too good and when you watch them play against teams past the 10-spot, the disparity is huge.

    Id put us in the Top 15. I think we are def better than Japan and our record against them overall points to that.

    Wouldve have loved to have seen a match involving us vs Mexico or USA as I think the teams are just about even (Mexico being a bit better than both).
     
  24. BocaFan

    BocaFan Member+

    Aug 18, 2003
    Queens, NY
    Nah, just getting tiresome. This is the second world cup in a row where Germans feel they were the best team of the tournament even though they were beaten fair and square in the semis.
     
  25. NJDevils1087

    NJDevils1087 Member

    Jun 25, 2010
    Arlington, VA
    Club:
    Wigan Athletic FC
    Look at the body of work. Germany, Spain and Holland (the consensus elite 3, even though I have Spain in #7 I believe) all played 7 matches. Holland and Spain were 6-0-1, Germany was 5-0-2.

    -- Germany until the semi had no problem dispatching anyone unless down a man, and even then dominated Serbia. This was a run that included THREE 4 goal performances (not too shabby when you consider two of them were against Argentina and England), and a 3 goal effort against one of the better defensive teams in the tournament in Uruguay, albeit in the more open 3rd place game. The only time they ever looked weak was when they were missing Muller in the Semi and decided to not play their own game, over-respecting a very beatable Spanish side. Put that on the coaching staff and relatively large amount of youthfulness in the team.

    -- Spain was a mental mess, couldn't gain a significant advantage on anyone that played any defense (aka anyone but Chile) and barely scraped through the majority of their games, including a bad loss where they looked like a mental joke of a club, couldn't hit the target to save their lives, and looked like they had no idea what to do in the final third. They wouldn't even continue to use a sub who was brilliant for them (Jesus Navas) every time he stepped on the pitch. He'd get in the game for 10 minutes and then Xavi/Iniesta/Ramos/Alonso would completely ignore him the rest of the time despite his totally changing the angle of attack and giving most of the sides he faced fits (especially Switzerland and Holland). If Spain had played through Navas for more than the first 5-10 minutes he got on the pitch vs the Swiss, they'd have had an equalizer, I firmly believe that.

    -- Holland was very workmanlike the entire tournament, but they had their moments of difficulty. They could easily have drawn/lost against Denmark if not handed a lead at the start of the 2nd half. They played very nonchalantly against Cameroon. They went down against Brazil. There were a number of moments of weakness for the side, but frankly less so than Spain.

    If anyone has a claim to the best performance in the tournament frankly, it's the Dutch moreso than the Spanish -- they were willing to play a style that could win them the tournament instead of playing openly and with some rather reckless abandon they displayed in tournaments prior (ie Euro 08), and were very workmanlike in dispatching the majority of their opponents.
     

Share This Page