Again, I suggest further research before making preposterous claims. You also might note that Kewell's strike rate last year was higher than the overall rate during his Leeds career, though indeed worse than in the 2 preceding seasons. Harry Kewell (Liverpool) Information Date of birth 22 September 1978 Height 5.11 Place of birth Smithfield, Sydney Weight 11.9 Nationality Position Midfield Nickname Squad No. 7 Recent Career History By Club (1999 onwards) Team Debut Apps (+ sub) Goals Yellows Reds Liverpool 17/08/2003 58 (6) 11 7 0 Leeds 138 (9) 30 11 0 Recent Career History By Season (1999 onwards) Season First App. Apps (+ sub) Goals Yellows Reds 2004/2005 10/08/2004 11 (4) 0 0 0 2003/2004 17/08/2003 47 (2) 11 7 0 2002/2003 17/08/2002 41 (0) 16 4 0 2001/2002 18/08/2001 34 (1) 11 2 0 2000/2001 02/12/2000 18 (8) 2 3 0 1999/2000 25/09/1999 44 (0) 1 2 0 1998/1999 12/04/1999 1 (0) 0 0 0
Goals scored - we played one game less in the league and we're down to one main striker (Thank you, Michael; chin up, Djib) Hang on there, do you think I only watched Chelsea twice, full stop??? He-he-he... I've been to Stamford Bridge twice but I've caught a few games on the telly. Incidentally, I've seen us play about fifteen times but missed the last 3 games thru' playing footy, work and lack of TV coverage. Only been to three games this season, but will hopefully go to see our kids take on Spurs in the League Cup, was going to go to Birmingham to see us play Villa but, alas, I am taking the bird to Barbados then. It's a hard life. If getting brought down is called theatrics, then the best actor, I've seen in recent yeards is Jesper Gronkjaer, hands down. "Except you've no idea if he does coke" - eeerrrrm, let us see - he admitted it. Did he make that up for PR purposes? So, show me where God has been convicted, suspended for it or publicly admitted it. (Folds arms, waits) The "bloated b*stard" in his day was better than anything that ever "graced" (of such a term can be applied) Stamford Bridge. So, chin up! 8th place - it's a rebuilding process. It doesn't use blood money.
That's "ofF topic", otherwise what you said does not make much senSe. I hope that helps. I think people are enjoying themselves.
I think you meant "whose" there - errors like that rile me. There are some better one-for-one, but overall, there is no denying that Chelsea are currently getting the better results, though I have thoroughly enjoyed Liverpool's football this season.
We've been missing our top striker for a month, and lost another one to well publicizied issues. That, and team close shop against us when we're at THEIR place. But apparently us scoring as many goals as you makes our offense weak, while you have a striker playing well. If you can't communicate properly, don't blame me. Gronkjaer diving? What the hell are you talking about? Baros has? Really? Oooh, sorry for you then. (Learn to read.) Mutu hasn't admitted to it either. Ooops. Have fun with the rebuilding process! Its going to be a looooong 50 years. Oh, and do enjoy 8th place and Harry Kewell's "form". LOL
True. But, of course, in this case, "who's" is not being used as a contraction, but a possessive (Chelsea's or Liverpool's). So it is accurate. I'd suggest sticking to inflating Kewell's stats. There isn't much below spelling smack, except for incorrect spelling smack.
My, my, we really are dealing with a cretin here. Mutu is a cokehead Chelsea have sacked striker Adrian Mutu after the Romanian international failed a drug test and admitted he had taken cocaine.
This was the original sentence: "Midtable fan arguing with top of the table fan over who's players are performing better." London Wanka pointed out, correctly, that the sentence should read "...over whose players are performing better." You have just embarrassed yourself and exposed your ignorance to the world by posting the above.