when i first saw it it looked like a polished bar of soap someone painted or one of those mints with a flavour inside you get at the restaurant
https://www.manutd.com/en/videos/detail/video-of-old-trafford-regeneration-project-on-23-sep-2024 now there's a video
Seems clear the direction they want to go and smart that this is not being sold as a new stadium but instead for a regeneration project for the whole area.
So Ineos ending work from home, cutting 250 jobs including firing the kitman, club historian(40 years), comms officer(25 years), and scraping lunches for matchday staff is having such a brilliant impact on the performance of the team, right?
i am unsure how to feel about INEOS so far: very clumsy handling of the review at the end of last season. made the wrong choice and had to walk it back a mere 3 months later ( - ) overtly courting other managers which left ten Hag in a weak position ( - ) clear plan with the summer signings though - age, profile, ability etc. ( + ) shifted a lot of players that weren't good enough for decent money ( + ) thankfully smarter than most and can see beyond Tuchel, Potter, Southgate as the only options to replace ten Hag ( + ) should have known Amorim and a fair few others would have been better or at minimum good choices in the summer ( ? ) i'll give them more time but it's been a mixed bag so far. not hopeless though
Good article today on the Athletic that touches on the last point above by Ruud - they did look at Amorim in the summer but both parties decided then the time wasn’t right. His buyout clause was higher and they also wanted to give ETH a chance under the new structure. Makes some sense in my opinion, but counter point to that now is (1) while the buyout for Amorim is less the payout to ETH is higher - not sure whether we are paying more or less though (2) hard to say that ETH was really given a run under the new structure, hasn’t been that many games. For me, seeing how this played out, the move should have been done in the summer - but better now than never I suppose and certainly better than somehow ending up with a Southgate.
very true. didn't even have 15 games under the new regime. but he did have even more of his own players and was performing even worse (less ppg for example or not winning back to back league games in a year or whatever) my guess is INEOS set some kind of target for league finish and they pulled the plug now because the % of the points remaining that need to be won to meet the target has already crossed 80% if not 85%
INEOS themselves are on the clock so they can’t dither if they hope to be successful. There is still 75% of the season to salvage.
Hmm... Radcliffe buys more of us: https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_...d-ownership-sir-jim-ratcliffe-increases-stake
not sure how accurate this is given the source but doesn't seem too far off. regardless we have a lot of wage doing nothing useful
Wasn't sure where to post this, but given the renos to Carrington are from Radcliff's investment it seemed that this was the best spot. Good article on the athletic - reminder you can use reader view to see it Welcome to Carrington – the evolution of Manchester United’s training ground
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpwxx15vjdxo Replacing Old Trafford with a new 100,000-seater Manchester United stadium and regenerating the surrounding area could bring £7bn to the UK economy, a new report suggests.
Incredibly depressing reading on the state of our finances. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6080398/2025/01/23/manchester-united-transfer-cash-problem/ Glazers had to (partially) sell as they were running out of road. Ineos are coming to a similar crossroads - gonna have to either inject more or with decreasing revenue from no CL / Europa football, higher interest on debt repayments, still paying of transfer debt for garbage players, players coming to end of contracts etc. It will still come to a head at some point.