Turning up the heat on the club's sponsors 🚨 TeamViewer, the IT company that recently signed a £235 million shirt sponsorship deal with #mufc, has been bombarded with negative reviews online from United fans, meaning their score on Trustpilot has plummeted from four stars out of five to one #mujournal [Times] pic.twitter.com/Dj5W3uVZx9— United Journal (@theutdjournal) May 4, 2021
just a (video) reminder of who we're dealing with in all this https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/12297104/avram-glazer-refuses-to-apologise-for-super-league
This is quite a good summary of the financial position Of course Utd claim that the team viewer deal is not apples for apples because they will make up the difference with a auto-sponsor but I feel that is a bit of a bogus argument. Tech are now the glamour sponsors, not the auto industry. Yet Utd had to give a steep discount. A statistical analysis on the Glazers ownership of Manchester United compared to other clubs. On money taken out, falling behind on the pitch and even commercial deals starting to drop. Read in full in @FT https://t.co/irtvTdx6iW (Hat tip to @SwissRamble and others) pic.twitter.com/EzMtEKBAQs— Murad Ahmed (@muradahmed) May 8, 2021
#mufc have missed out on a proposed new training kit deal worth £200m over 10 years after the The Hut Group had concerns about the supporters’ campaign to boycott the club’s commercial partners in protest at the Glazers’ ownership #mulive [@JamieJackson___]— utdreport (@utdreport) May 8, 2021 Manchester United lose £200m training kit deal over fans’ anti-Glazers campaign | Manchester United | The Guardian
The full article is behind a paywall. Quote from part of the public piece; Nick Train’s Lindsell Train UK equity fund owns 27 per cent of the available United A-shares on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which is in effect 7 per cent of the club. Train revealed that he demanded a meeting with United executives after the European Super League (ESL) revelations last month and is now “considering the implications for our investment”. Glazers under renewed pressure as one of Manchester United’s leading shareholders expresses worries over “reputational damage” inflicted by Super League scandal | @martynziegler https://t.co/Muw6nT7LKl— Times Sport (@TimesSport) May 15, 2021
🚨 Forecast of the Premier League money for the 2020/21 season #mufc #mujournal [@sportingintel] https://t.co/tfA8Cd3sZG pic.twitter.com/ZdJ5XOEdVM— United Journal (@theutdjournal) May 23, 2021
Poor from the club, if you've done any rehab from say an ankle injury line Mag had then you will know how important swimming pools are for non-weight bearing joint exercise to safely speed recovery. Seems to back up the narrative of under-investment on maintaining facilities, fixtures and fittings. 1399986561249431553 is not a valid tweet id
Smh...This is all becoming a bad joke now. Another example why the anti Glazer protests can't stop even if we have a half decent summer transfer wise. The issues with players/strength of the squad is only the tip of the iceberg. So many more issues, that are coming to light, and making the club look bad compared to others. And we're supposed to be one of the biggest clubs, not just in England but in Europe?
Joel Glazer addressed GNev's criticism at the recent fan forum. Manchester United owner Joel Glazer responds to Gary Neville criticism (msn.com) As stated previously, the time for talk has long passed: let's see what he (and his siblings) do by way of action, starting with this transfer window...
Always start with the cheap superficial visible stuff Rejoice! It’s getting a spray of paint at last! (Pic RN seller Nathan) pic.twitter.com/prFurD32yj— Barney @Red News (@barneyrednews) June 16, 2021
🚨 JUST IN: Manchester United's net debt has been listed as £443.5m in Q3 earnings #mufc #mujournal [@samuelluckhurst]— United Journal (@theutdjournal) June 17, 2021 Positively can't have any affect on our ability to spend, surely... Various figures in the @ManUtd results, including dividend payment of nine cents per share = £10.7m. The Glazer family own around 75% of the shares, so £8.025m. Joel Glazer defended dividends at Fans Forum.— Simon Stone (@sistoney67) June 17, 2021
Some interesting 10-year financial trends Manchester United graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance:1. Profit & Loss2. Revenue3. Expenses4. Balance SheetEach of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing the 10-year trend for #MUFC pic.twitter.com/vzOciK0Pu3— Swiss Ramble (@SwissRamble) August 19, 2021
Shares in #ManchesterUnited have soared 9% after the football club announced a sensational deal to re-sign Cristiano Ronaldo. As a result, the club's value increased by about $300 million on the New York Stock Exchange. Investors are rubbing their hands #CR7 #SportBusiness pic.twitter.com/NQBLDWPifr— Łukasz Bączek (@Lu_Class_) August 27, 2021
everyone deserves to enjoy the football vibe after the last 18 months. it's been a feel-good window but also good to remember progress was made from that protest. Upgrades to OT, fan ownership scheme, some communication between MUST and ownership. don't think anyone believes the glazers are good for the club, but the situation has improved in the short-term.
yes. plus i am sure the full windfall of Ronaldo's return has not been realised as yet. as for other clubs we need not look further than Barça. i would love an update on their demise actually
Disgusting that the club is paying out £23 million in dividends after reporting those losses. f the glazers.