United finishes up a three-game homestand against defending champs colorado. Yeah, still feels weird to type that. In any event, a winnable match. VAMOS UNITED! When: Saturday, 5/14/11, 7:30pm Where: RFK League Records : DC 3-2-4 (11 pts), coll 4-2-3 (14 pts) TV: CSN Twitter: #DCU on game day RFK weather on Saturday: Few Showers, 71/56
From the Rapids website HealthONE Injury Report for May 10, 2011: OUT: FW Omar Cummings (R ankle sprain); FW Caleb Folan (R groin strain); FW Macoumba Kandji (L knee ACL tear) QUESTIONABLE: DF Eddie Ababio (R hamstring strain) PROBABLE: GK Matt Pickens (R groin strain); FW Quincy Amarikwa (L ankle sprain); FW Conor Casey (L hamstring strain); MF Sanna Nyassi (lower back strain)
wow arent those basically all the players that made the difference in the first game. Keeping that in mind and the streak we're on I feel like we have to win this one.
Please oh please someone find the picture of the original Rapid Man -- finding this image haunts my dreams
Yes!! this is winnable!!! we need to pick up points... would be awsome after 10 games ..4, 4 and 2 is better than I hoped for after last year.!! Come in United.. its a big one for us.. like seattle.. if they fight with the same intensity then we will carry the 3 points which we need!!..just stating the very obvious.. Now the techical side... mmm I will leave that to another poster.. I like the concentration and minimal defensive mistakes the last game... although it was FC Dallass..
join the club, I have been looking for a few years. welcome to my personal hell. Happy Hour prices apply every day. I usually find it hard to get up much angst for a team from that useless ********ing homophobic white-power state, but after the loss earlier I would like to see United thump them again.
a draw hurts us.. we can't afford to drop points!! Colorado is not NJRB... they can be taken down.. they r decent but not that much better than we are..no.. we need three points..
You don't need to minimize our effort last game. I thought we did well, and except for a great save from Hartman, we would have won. Dallas was a Cup finalist last year, and we....were not.
A draw does us little good. We need 3 points if we want to keep up in the East. After this game we're idle for 2 weeks and then 2 very tough games in quick succession in Portland and LA. It's tough to see us picking up points there. So if we don't get 3 points here, our next good chance for a win won't be for another month when we host the Clashquakes ...
That's the second generation Rapid Man. If I remember correctly. the original had fish jumping out of his head or his back. Yes, even stranger. asitis
Nah, this one's easy to find. I can't find a picture of the original guy - he had white water running 'down' his back and had a fish jumping out of it. A truly bizarre mascot.
Nope, the original guy had fish jumping out of his, uh, head or back or whatever the hell it was. Weirdest mascot I ever saw in my life. Edit - what Matt said
I have become quite discouraged. I've searched for a long time with zero success. (Maybe I'll try this new 'google' tool. I hear it's pretty good)
So in an effort, once again, to come up with the new magic search terms to unlock this mystery, somewhere on page 3 of my Google search I came across: Immunomodulatory Treatment for Infertile Men with Antisperm Antibodies Get to work people. We only do this when we play Colorado, and for this year, this is the last time. Chop chop.
Are you $48 discouraged? [ame="http://www.amazon.com/Rapidman-Lambert-M-Surhone/dp/6134897329"]Amazon.com: Rapidman (9786134897327): Lambert M. Surhone, Mariam T. Tennoe, Susan F. Henssonow: Books[/ame] I mean, no guarantee of pictures, but I'm pretty sure you could sue for not including a picture of a guy with a fish jumping out of his head, just on the basis of willfully ignoring the one opportunity in all of human history to do that.
There's something wrong with Amazon's automatic pricing model. The sounds like a vanity press project, and the low availability does not imply (valued) rarity. The disclaimer in the description says: "Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online."