If there's one thing on this board that really pisses me off, it's people who assume that you represent the opposition, and then re-characterize and oversimplify what you'd said so they can mow it down. And in so doing they almost always oversimplify their own point into nonsense. Yes, the most important thing a forward can do is contribute goals. However, if you're going to go to ridiculous extremes and say that the ONLY thing that matters is finishing, such that the better finisher is ALWAYS the better forward, period, then I'm going to say that you are plainly wrong. A player who does nothing but score (neither creating any of their own chances or participating in the build up or--gasp!--providing any defensive pressure on the backs when needed) is often a luxury. Unless the rest of your team is really awesome or you really score an awful lot and have a team that can get him a lot of service in dangerous places. But I didn't say that Boyd's ONLY a guy who can score. And Agudelo's not a guy who sucks at finishing and is awesome in every other area. This is just too binary a starting point for any sort of discussion. And nowadays, you realize that there are other factors besides shot-stopping that 'Keepers are rated on, right? I mean Valdes is not considered one of the world's most elite shot-stoppers, and yet he's a rock at Barcelona largely because he might be the world's best distributor from the GK position. Such is true of forwards as well... A few weeks ago there was an article about how Dempsey puts a lot of shots off target and isn't therefore all that clinical a finisher. What that article failed to mention however is how many chances he tends to find for club and country, and how he often creates his own chance (and how he often aggressively pursues the half-chance or even quarter-chance...even when he sometimes might be better advised not to). Pure finishing isn't everything. It's only one important thing. Mind you, I didn't even say I think Boyd isn't as good as Agudelo. I said in limited looks I'd say Boyd's looks a better finisher, and Agudelo looks better in every other facet. Period, nothing more or less.
Back on point... You know what I'm really upset about? No one asked Porter the tough questions. That is an epic failure by the U.S. Soccer media. Why didn't anyone ask him about burning out his starters? The backline? The GK's? Game management? Substitutions? Tactics? Etc. Where are the quotes where he explains his decisions? The media needs to grow a set and do some actual reporting.
I think so. I've been wondering what our best line-up for this group would look like if absolutely everyone were 100% healthy and available. My suspicion is that it wouldn't include too many players who were on the field against El Salvador.
I'll bite on this ----------Altidore Shea-----Adu--------Gatt -------Diskerud-Morales Valentin-D.Williams-Opara-Chandler ---------------Hamid Would be a reasonable guess I suppose with Porter's formation.
All things considered, I only see Chandler and Jozy making some difference there. Perhaps not even enough to change the end result.
Well I don't know if Porter would play an actual defensive midfield, or if he thought Jeffrey and Diskerud were Xavi and Ineista without Busquets needed, but Morales would make a difference. But you'd actually need to play him or someone like Okugo in that role to utilize the talent. Gatt would be a an upgrade and Danny Williams over Kitchen might be the biggest upgrade of all of them.
Boyd might have something to say about that if he makes the first team at Borussia Dortmund, but as of right now yes Jozy is our best forward.
Boyd right now is probably #3 on the forward list for players born 1989 or later. If he makes the first team in Dortmund then yes, that will skyrocket his rankings. Of course, if Altidore transfers to Manchester United or Agudelo to Milan that would cancel out his move.
Ives actually praised Porter and Wahl played off the lossas rather meaningless. They have no balls most of the time and they continued to show that. There isn't exactly a lot of pressure on the USSF because the US soccer team isn't very popular so it's up to those reporters to ask some tough questions and they continue to feed crap and fluff.
Our best soccer coverage mostly comes from blogs and independent types rather than the few major sports writers who just produce fluff at record levels. It's funny when I think of Germany where clubs are literally scared of Bild and Bayern had a sort relationship where they buy them of by giving Bild access.
Interesting this.... http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/greg_lalas/09/28/u20.us/index.html Rinse, repeat
According to Ives' twitter, Alexander Larin has been suspended for the next 3 games. Good. Glad this was reviewed.
Its too little too late, but its something. I assume he's also out for any full national team games? or is this just olympics if ES makes it?
I think it's the next three games for his country regardless (can't find the release): Avi Creditor @AviCreditor Per CONCACAF release, El Salvador U-23 left back Alexander Larin suspended 3 games, presumably for having a bit too much bite against the US
Or was it for the punch to the face? Or all of the above. Should clearly have been suspended after the Canada biting... Such is CONCACAF.
Why exactly Danny Cruz wasn't even in a consideration for this team? With Jeffrey and Bunburry against Canada that was the softest bunch of players imaginable.
Because he wasn't competing with Jeffrey or Bunbury. Although how much of a look Porter gave him is questionable considering he never got a look.