Possible player moves thread

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by Coach_Barry, Jul 28, 2002.

  1. Coach_Barry

    Coach_Barry Member

    Aug 18, 2001
    Taunton, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Lots of theoretical options out there that could be helpful to us right now.

    Wolde speculated that the Revs are in the same position that Colorado was in when they went to the MLS Cup final. I think if we have any prayer of coming close to that we will need something big.

    Kante - is officially signed but last I heard is still waiting on visa stuff. If and when he gets on the pitch, is he likely to make much of a difference?

    Griffiths - a left sided midfielder. From the LAG forum:
    "The 23-year-old Griffiths joined Los Angeles in a trade with the MetroStars last April 20 for a conditional SuperDraft pick, but bad practice habits -- not showing up -- led to the Galaxy waiving him on Thursday, a move that Schmid was not eager to make. "Basically, because he is a player with very good abilities," said the coach. "But you have to show up!"
    Sounds like mini-Diego. If we could get him through the maze of waiver, salary cap and guaranteed contracts, would we want him?

    Quijano - another midfielder, waived by LA then by Colorado. He is a little guy (5'9" 150#) and hasn't seen the pitch much. Same maze to navigate I imagine.

    Cassar - keeper formerly of Miami dropped by Ipswichtown. Healthy and athletic or another injury-prone problem. Probably less likely than Griffiths or Quijano considering that he isn't even signed with MLS.

    DC United apparently will need to trade with us, the Crew, or ? for a discovery option if they choose to sign Gazza. Another big IF - but if so, then who from DC is Crazy Ray likely to deal and would we want a cast off from another weak team?

    And, who of our talented players do we dismiss?

    OR, would another roster change just delay the gelling process?
     
  2. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think DC would be willing to give up either Olsen or Convey for a discovery pick to get Gazza. Literally, we have (or Columbus) has Gazza and DC wants him, so they will have to trade a big player for him. We need help on defense, but the DC defense is shaky, so why not pick up a young american offender.

    Cassar would be a great pick up but i think we should take our chances with Brown. A better idea would to get rid of Sommer and pick up Cassar, stick him in the #1 spot and have brown learn from Jeff, that way we have a good keeper now and a good keeper coming up.

    As for the other guys, there is a reason why they were released and I don't think the Revs would pick any of them up, especially Griffiths.
     
  3. The Magpie

    The Magpie Member

    Nov 19, 1998
    Cambridge, MA
    Here's the million dollar question and one that's been bantered about on the DC boards: will they give up Etcheverry if they decide to sign Gazza?

    The Magpie
     
  4. MouseyTongue

    MouseyTongue New Member

    Feb 16, 2001
    a box in the Chairma
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hmm... APC and a discovery slot for El Diablo and a pick?

    Chacon goes up top in DC and we have a real #10.

    Only if we also get a new coach as well since SN probably wouldn't go for a system centered around a #10.

    Well at least this conversation is more exciting than watching the games ;)
     
  5. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    To get El Diablo would be stupid. He's past his prime, like another rev, and would only bitch. I don't want him, and i think many would second that. Like I said, Olsen or Convey would be the best pick for us. Plus, i think Etch will leave once he figures out that Gazza will take his spot.
     
  6. Coach_Barry

    Coach_Barry Member

    Aug 18, 2001
    Taunton, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    maybe no Gazza for Ray

    It looks like the Discovery slot trade for Gazza idea may be fading away before it even became clearer.

    Ray was quoted after the game yesterday saying that DC needs help up top and that priority may put a halt to Gazza's signing with them.
     
  7. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yea i heard that it will take two things to get Gazza here, one, deciding if he (Gazza) wants to sign, and two, if the league wants to sign him for a price he is willing to take. Hopefully it will go down, I'd really like to see him play at CMGi the next time they comes here.
     
  8. soccertim

    soccertim Member

    Mar 29, 2001
    Mass
    If they sign Gazza, they need to dump a SI. Maybe we could get Nelson from them cheap.
     
  9. JG_Revs

    JG_Revs Moderator

    Sep 11, 1999
    Boston
    We don't have a discovery left (used on Semedo and Kante).
     
  10. Coach_Barry

    Coach_Barry Member

    Aug 18, 2001
    Taunton, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Again, I disagree with JG's assessment of Kante's discovery status. He was drafted by DC this year and not signed. I don't believe that makes him discoverable.
     
  11. GPK

    GPK BigSoccer Supporter

    Aug 5, 1999
    San Diego, CA
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Lalas was a discovery pick. Anything is possible.
     
  12. Mike Marshall

    Mike Marshall Member+

    Feb 16, 2000
    Woburn, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I was under the impression that the Revs picked Kante up off waivers???
     
  13. JG_Revs

    JG_Revs Moderator

    Sep 11, 1999
    Boston
    I don't know, you might be right. I was fairly certain he was discovered.

    I looked through any releases or articles I could find, everything simply talked about the Revs "signing" him. Nothing specific. Usually if it's a waiver pickup, it says so. Since Kante hadn't signed a contract with MLS at DC, so I don't see any reason why he would have been kept in the league's player pool.
     
  14. lufty

    lufty Member

    Aug 21, 2000
    I know I am gonna take alot of shite for this but hey.. if DC doesn't want Gazza...... would he fit in here?
     
  15. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    $$

    Doesn't a discovery mean that, by definition, the league has to spend $$ to acquire the player (up to $75K)?
     
  16. Gregor

    Gregor New Member

    Jun 23, 1999
    Boston, MA USA
    ,..,

    El Diablo de la Mullet? no thanks, if the Revs D could shut him down, why would we want him?
     
  17. JG_Revs

    JG_Revs Moderator

    Sep 11, 1999
    Boston
    Re: $$

    Not necessarily. An out-of-contract player not in the MLS player pool would be acquired via discovery (which is what I believe Kante was).
     
  18. soccertim

    soccertim Member

    Mar 29, 2001
    Mass
    Re: $$

    I think that $75k is closer to the max salary that a discovery player can make. The amount of money used to acquire a discovery would be minimal. Aren't almost all of them free transfers?
     
  19. Revs In First :)

    Aug 15, 2001
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    New acquistions

    I hear the Revs will be adding Marshall Leonard (2002 draft pick who trained with them but didn't sign) as developmental along with Daouda Kante's signing. Anybody else here this, or am I sniffing too much glue?
     

Share This Page