He's being sued by a group of "fans" who are angry he cut short a concert set on the Metallica tour in July. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/limpsuit1.html I probably would have paid extra to have them not play at all...
He tried the same thing with Angelina Jolie, but she apparently laughed him away... Why would any celebrity babe wanna start something with this ugly, dumb, no-talent has-been?
I don't see why anyone would sue for that. It would seem to me like it would be cheap at twice the price to see Fred Durst get hit in the sack by a lemon after dodging a hail of garbage on stage. A historic moment witnessed by a privileged few.
There are so many things the "victims" could have done (arrange boycotts, SPAM radio stations, etc.), but we live in such a litigious society it's pathetic. This is just like those losers who sued Creed a while ago (also in Shitcago if I'm not mistaken) and had their case thrown out last week finally. And to sue over this kinda crap, these saps had to admit they are fans of Limp Bizkit or Creed. Even worse. Not to mention none of these people suing must be math majors. They each want a $25 refund (of the $75 face value) because Limp Bizkit only played 17 minutes. But there were FIVE bands, so that should be $15, and even less since Limp Bizkit played over 25% of their one-hour set. Not really a bunch of Mensas we're dealing with, eh? Pretty soon, kids' math tests will include questions about this kind of litigation: 1. Johnny saves up allowance for two months so he can afford the $75 US for one ticket to see his favorite rock band, who are part of a showcase tour featuring five pop acts. Johnny's favorite band is supposed to play a one-hour set. The people next to Johnny help chase the band offstage 17 minutes into their set, by throwing projectiles such as lemons and sodas at the band. Should Johnny sue, and if so, for how much? Or, should he have just beaten the **** out of the idiots next to him? If the latter, prove as a theorem. You must show all your work.