PGE Park plan delayed for a third time

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by bright, Dec 1, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bright

    bright Member

    Dec 28, 2000
    Central District
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2009/12/01/three-strikes-pge-park-plan-delayed-for-a-third-time/

    My take is that these new design proposals have to be scrapped if construction is going to happen according to schedule. It's just like what happened with the potential deal for the baseball stadium in Beaverton. The public vote was going to take too much time, so the Beaverton deal was scrapped altogether.

    There is also a supposed deadline of December/January to finalize the deal. Even if this proposal is voted on positively on January 6, that doesn't provide much more time to iron out any other financial details.
    (http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2009/10/01/portlands-major-league-soccer-deadline-extended-until-winter/)

    It makes me wonder out loud why the city and Paulsons continue to be at odds so often. The Paulsons are also having issues with other municipalities in the area regarding the new baseball stadium. If they can't get this deal done soon, MLS should move their entry to 2012. The stadium renovations are little by little being reduced in order to accommodate this increasingly tight schedule. That will have implications down the road. One extra year will give them the time to do this right.
     
  2. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Portland hater!

    (Sorry, figured I'd get that out of the way in a hurry on this thread)
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. soccermaul

    soccermaul Red Card

    May 28, 2009
    On the Bus..
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  4. BacteriaEP

    BacteriaEP New Member

    Apr 13, 2009
    Portland
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I don't know about that. Why is it fair to push Portland back on the chance that it's stadium remodel will be delayed a bit when we have teams like San Jose and Kansas City both of which are playing in sub-11,000 capacity stadiums that aren't even designated solely for soccer.

    Bottomline is that Portland MLS will be the next best thing to happen to MLS considering the huge rivalry between Seattle and Portland. I doubt MLS is willing to back down over some minor stadium issues that can probably be solved before the beginning of the 2011 season even with these new delays.
     
  5. bright

    bright Member

    Dec 28, 2000
    Central District
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    From the article:

    A December 9th vote is much better than a January 6th vote, as was reported in the first article I posted. The Oregonian reporter is only saying that it is "likely" that there will be a December 9th vote while the Willamette Week reporter has a statement from the mayor's office. Maybe she misconstrued what this statement means?

    Statement from the mayor's office in the WWeek article:

     
  6. bright

    bright Member

    Dec 28, 2000
    Central District
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    San Jose and Kansas City are original teams, so they have received a lot of leeway. Recent expansion teams have set a bar for how further expansion teams should enter the league. Even Merritt Paulson and Don Garber agree that things like continuing to share with baseball would detract from the type of in-stadium experience they want to provide. Once the renovations are agreed upon, it will take additional political wrangling in the future to add anything new. So whatever they come up with in the next month or so is what we will have to live with for seasons to come.
     
  7. arkjayback

    arkjayback Member

    Mar 29, 2008
    Le Mars, IA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Why are they fighting him so hard? Have they not seen what the Sounders have done for Seattle? Portland has one major sports team and they're killing their chances for another one. A Portland MLS franchise has so much damn potential its awful to see the elected officials fight it so hard. I can't imagine the frustration that MLS fans in Portland feel.
     
  8. bright

    bright Member

    Dec 28, 2000
    Central District
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The article from The Oregonian has been updated, and references to a December 9th vote have been removed. So it looks January 6th is indeed the new date of the vote. Here is what the edited portion looks like now (compared to what I posted in post #5):

    http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2009/12/talks_continue_on_converting_p.html

    There are still financial disagreements between the city and the Paulsons. Mayor Adams does not want to put a new law on the books that would allow development of office buildings at PGE Park unless a deal looks likely to be struck. These delays are like a canary in a coal mine.

    From my understanding, the city has suffered some financial setbacks this year that have affected its capacity to fund the renovations (namely by selling bonds), and this has led to them trying to negotiate a better deal. As it stands, the Paulsons could effectively get all the renovations for free depending on the inflation rate over the next few years (which affects the future value of rent dollars) and despite contributing some private money. The potential future savings from the rent holiday could counter-act even this private contribution. So the city wants to ensure that they at least get to keep stadium naming rights money. They are also negotiating where the rent from any new development at PGE Park, such as the medical clinic, would go. The Paulsons want to keep that rent, while the city believes that some or all of that rent should go to them.
     
  9. Roehl Sybing

    Roehl Sybing Guest

    AFAIK, the Sounders haven't been squeezing the city of Seattle for public money.
     
  10. sportie1

    sportie1 Member

    Sep 4, 2008
    WRONG!! the next best thing to happen to MLS will be the philadelphia franchise, followed by the opening of the new RBNY stadium in 2010;

    after that, the next best thing will be the Triangle rivalry of vancouver, seattle and portland in 2011

    followed by the successful # 19 franchise of montreal in 2012

    MLS will keep on getting more and more successes and good news stories IMO, at least until the # 20 franchise is awarded-- and if it goes to beckham, then that wil be the next best news for MLS, especially from a world-attention point-of-view

    as long as MLS does the player bargaining in a constructive, positive manner, then there is lots of good news coming

    and if KC, SJ and houston get their stadiums going by 2012-2013, then... u get the picture!! (who the heck knows about DC and NE!!)
     
  11. Sounder

    Sounder Member

    Apr 29, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Portland needs to get its act together. This PNW thing will blow away anything else in the MLS. Not getting it done is stupid for MLS, Portland, and US soccer.
     
  12. BROSUF

    BROSUF Member

    Feb 21, 2008
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    wow
     
  13. savier

    savier Member

    Jul 10, 2004
    Portland
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    bright posts thread on bigsoccer about the portland stadium, bigsoccer posters who don't otherwise follow the situation freak out for a couple pages, all the portland people don't freak out because they know better.

    this is getting done. no worries.
     
  14. savier

    savier Member

    Jul 10, 2004
    Portland
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    oh hey BROSUF wanna turn this into a portland-seattle rivalry thread?!?!?

    i BET I KNOWWW MORE ABOUT SOCCOR THAN YOU N00b
     
  15. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    The Sounders didn't make their stadium.
     
  16. murtaugh

    murtaugh Member+

    Jul 19, 2004
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Well, no. But Paul Allen sure did.
     
  17. BROSUF

    BROSUF Member

    Feb 21, 2008
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Nobody is hijacking anything here rasta.

    You'd also know that I am FULLY behind Portland 2011-- intro to this league. check into it
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. Hierarchyfive

    Hierarchyfive Member

    Sep 17, 2005
    Portland
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hey bright can you provide an update on Vancouver? Word is they are playing at a temporary stadium on a cricket ground. I suppose they should be moved back to 2012 too, right?

    I'm dying for your take on another teams stadium negotiations.
     
  19. Paul Schmidt

    Paul Schmidt Member

    Feb 3, 2001
    Portland, Oregon!
    Rule #10,973 of political life: If you run a government and are in a negotiation with a private party involving your money, and you cut off negotiations too soon, you look like you caved. Therefore, you may as well have caved.

    The city has incentive to stall. They want to look good, they want to look like they won even more from Merritt Paulson.

    I refer back to the end of the task force crunched up against the vote and the eventual award. An end date has been picked for this process. Count on rubbing up right against it.
     
  20. bright

    bright Member

    Dec 28, 2000
    Central District
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Technically, he squeezed the state of Washington, not the city of Seattle. A few other differences were that the project went to a vote by the citizens of the state, the project was more than just a stadium (also a convention/exhibition hall and a center-piece of SODO/Pioneer Square redevelopment), and the Kingdome was falling apart and needed to be replaced. The Qwest Field referendum was passed in 1997 when the economy was doing much better. 2009 has a different economic climate.
     
  21. carnifex2005

    carnifex2005 Member+

    Jul 1, 2008
    Club:
    Vancouver Whitecaps
    They aren't playing on a cricket ground but they will be playing a few games (if not the entire season depending on overruns on the new roof) at a temporary stadium. Location as yet unknown but more than likely at the old Empire Stadium site where the Whitecaps used to play before moving to BC Place. There are currently 8 bids for the temp stadium project. Here is the RFP for the temp stadium...


    [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]BC Pavilion Corporation

    Temporary Stadium Grandstand Seating



    Pavco, the crown corporation responsible for BC Place, is seeking proposals for the
    construction of temporary grandstands to facilitate the formation of a stadium suitable for
    the playing of Canadian football or soccer.

    Specific requirements are:

    - Capacity of 30,000 to 32,000 with at least 75% of the seats covered

    - Individual and seating preferred (to at least 85% of capacity)

    - Other facilities required include:

    - 24 private boxes
    - Media facilities (press box)
    - Broadcast boxes

    The location in the Greater Vancouver area is to be determined.

    Facilities which may be included in the proposal or which may be provided under other
    contracts include:

    - Washrooms
    - Concessions
    - Stadium lighting
    - Scoreboards and video boards
    - Sound

    The proposal must be priced by item i.e. seating, roof, lighting, etc.


    [/FONT]RFP closes Nov 20th 2009
    Winner announced Dec 5th 2009
    Work complete June 15th, 2010
     
  22. Roehl Sybing

    Roehl Sybing Guest

    Whose primary tenant is an NFL team.
     
  23. SeaM

    SeaM Member

    Nov 3, 2009
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Put grass in too, and maybe the Whitecaps should just play in that stadium. Sounds not too far off from some of the SSS other teams have.

    Re: Portland: I think it's a case of right place, wrong owner. If I were Garber I'd quietly look for another owner (a la Roth) who might want to start up in PDX. the last thing MLS needs is yet another team playing in a minor-league baseball stadium indefinitely.
     
  24. Hierarchyfive

    Hierarchyfive Member

    Sep 17, 2005
    Portland
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Do you have any idea what you are talking about, the parties involved, or the situation at hand?

    I don't think you do.
     
  25. Hierarchyfive

    Hierarchyfive Member

    Sep 17, 2005
    Portland
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    While this is interesting, I really wanted Bright's opinion since he considers himself the formost expert on the stadium negotiations happinging in cities he doesn't live in.
     

Share This Page