Can I ask where you get that from? I have he was a starter, not that it matters a lot. In any case, he saw action the 17th of August. That is exactly 29 days after the game against Portugal. If you have info that he entered that game as a sub and thus you dont want to count it as his return game, then you have that of the 21st of August that you yourself spoke about. That would make it 33 days after his match against Portugal. Even then, your claim that "Pele was on sideline for more then 5,6 weeks .. " which I quote from a post above is not right by any means. Much less Pelé's own statements about being out for more than 3 months...
Now you want to NAIL to EXACT number of days? or you want hours as well? Now you want to include that week is fine 1 week Shorter! I said I SECOND to your post! STILL 29 or 30days are like 4 to 5weeks ... no? (if exclude that week17 = 5 to6 weeks OK? Yet you said "no matter " alot!
Why do you want to mess things up? I said less than a month. You said he had been out MORE THAN 5 or 6 WEEKS. So which one is it? You second my post or are you claiming something different? Cant do both, can you? Its funny because even if going by our own account of the facts, he was not out that long (not MORE than 5 or 6 WEEKS). So, relax. I just dont care for you to come up with shite and pretend its FACT, GOSH! OK? And once again, what is your source to claim he was a sub in that game against Juventus the 17th of August?
Now it was you who felt like "personal" kinda thing? why make it a big deal? I excluded the week 17 (so it extended to more than 5 weeks) while you included = NO MATTERS much OK? OK let me say this if you feel happier: OK maybe I should count that week of 17 so Once was 100% correct!
Pelé said he was out 3 months. Major bullcrap. You said he was out MORE THAN 5 or 6 WEEKS. Closer but still incorrect. He was without playing 29 days. That is less than a month. That is what I posted but you felt the need to add an incorrect remark. You claimed he came back four days later, which is not truth, for he did play the 17th already. In any case that is 33 days. For you that is MORE THAN 5 WEEKS sidelined. Instead of saying you messed up, you are doing what you are doing. Can you please tell me where do you get it that he was a sub in the Juventus game of August 17 1966? If you dont, I will obviously have no choice but to think it is just your own BS, like when you tried to pass that Pelé had been out more than 5 or six weeks, when it had been 29 days.
Genius ... go and count yourself the number of WEEKS OK? Calendar for year 1966 JulyAugustSeptember SuMoTuWeThFrSa 12 3456789 10111213141516 17181920212223 24252627282930 31 SuMoTuWeThFrSa 123456 78910111213 14151617181920 21222324252627 28293031 SuMoTuWeThFrSa 123 45678910 11121314151617 18192021222324 252627282930
A player gets injured on a Thursday, misses the following week and returns on Tuesday. Thats back in 12 days for that guy. Would you still fight for your right to claim he was out MORE than 3 or 4 WEEKS?! Because that is what you are doing here, mate Where on Earth did you get that he was a sub on that game?!
c'mon be reasonable ... If you are working, you should have known how to count calendar in "WEEKS" not days ... I posted the caledar for you to count already Even if I miscounted for 1 week (1 game) or more and so what? Pele played 1300+games and so? did that make a big deal of 0,05% in error? GENIUS ... ? So should you warranty from now on everything you say will be like <1% error? I really do not know where you get that attitude from! You started pissing me off
no you PISSED ME OFF! Look back what I said: I second that, Pele was on sideline for more then 5,6 weeks .. I never said you were WRONG or so , why made it a big deal!
Since you are seemingly in a good mood again, why dont you say where you got that Pelé was a sub on August 17 1966 against Juventus?
I am in a better mood but you're still not worthy my mood - no more fun You nitpick from 5-6weeks (as I clearly said I excluded the week 17) and you still tried to nail to "LESS THAN 1 MONTH " .. which was oranges to apples (since one month could we 4 to 5weeks), and still were clearly more than 4 weeks no more fun
Baby James sad again? No fun to answer a simple question because you spoke bs and dont wanna admit it?
Do NOT piss me off again Go back to school and re-learn HOW TO COUNT the number of weeks in a month before come back here and try to be "clever" OK?
I dont mind, James. Get as pissed as you have to. You are pissed because I caught you talking bullshite, arent you? You wont stop going on and on with this crap of yours until I let you off the hook, wont you? Two false statements, thats what you contributed. Deal with it.
Someone need to know the basic ... let's learn from YAHOO answer How many weeks are in a month? Best Answer If you are looking for a whole number , you won't find it. The common Julian Calander uses 365.25 days for its year. Take the number of days for an average year. That is a non-leap year. 365.25 Divide that by 12. Those are the average days in a month. Then, Divide that number by 7 (the number of days in a week). There is your (nearly)exact answer. Never mind, here it is... 4.348 weeks in a month. 365.25/12/7=4.348 = 4 ,5 weeks ============================ And let's LEARN how many DAYS in a WEEK 4 "Weeks" in other calendars 4.1 Three-day 4.2 Four-day 4.3 Five-day 4.4 Six-day 4.5 Eight-day 4.6 Nine-day 4.7 Ten-day ===================================== NOW DO THE MATH ... and do it RIGHT: How many Days in a MONTH? LOL Wow maybe it was so COMPLICATED for some one to identify ...
Played on a Tuesday and came back on a Wednesday 29 days later. That is 4 weeks and one day. Thats not even an entire month. He was not "sidelined for more than 5 or 6 weeks" and he was not out for 5 weeks either. Keep talking about calendars all you want. A guy that gets injured on Tuesday, misses the next week and is back on the following Wednesday has been out 15 days. You would first claim he was out for more than 3 or 4 weeks, to then go down to 3 weeks waving around your calendar... And how peculiar that you have it in you to go on and on talking about calendars to justify your calling 29 days 5 weeks or whatever, but are too pissed to offer a much more simple and short answer to a little question I already asked many times...
29 days is 4 1/7 (4.15) weeks @James, rounding off it's much closer to 4 than 5. It's also a day short of one month. Can't believe you're arguing this
you have not read well the definition of "how many days per week"? If someone came from Nigeria, then 29days = (29/4) = more than 7Weeks If someone came from Indonesia, then 29days = (29/5)= 5.8weeks (closer to 6) ... and more ... LOL ================================== I said 5 to 6 weeks (not included Aug 17th) now even if we include that week, then it became 4 to 5 Weeks = PERFECTLY correct in any sense! I NEVER argued with him .... and I even "SECOND" him for that ... BUT ... look: 1= While I talked of "WEEKS" and Once tried to bend into "DAYS" 2- I said he was correct if we include that week (Aug 17) and Once (once again) bent it into "LESS than a MONTH" what the |-|33|_ |_ is that?