PBP: P01135809 Trump Espionage, Coup, Conspiracy, Racketeering, Fraud & Obstruction Trial Thread

He needs a dust filter for a Hoover Max Extract Pressure Pro, model 60.

 

(not using the quote function for readability)

(https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/t...e-music-thread.2113440/page-292#post-41453576 post 7300)
Terms (for quick reference):

C - Confidential (least restrictive)
S - Secret (middle restrctive)
TS - Top Secret (most restrictive)
NOFORN - No Foreign Nationals - distribution to non-US citizens is prohibited, regardless of their clearance or access permissions (NO FOReign National access allowed).
SPECIAL HANDLING - Only specified individuals are allowed to see the document.
ORCON - Originator controls dissemination and/or release of the document.
REL TO USA FVEY - Distribution of the information with appropriate personnel from Five Eyes (Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand)
REL TO USA FVY - Mistype here (#8 - https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/06/09/defendant-1s-38-count-indictment/) - Should read REL TO USA FVEY
TK - Talent Keyhole (access given to people with the need to know - based on knowledge, not necessarily security clearance)
REL - Followed by country codes indices what country(s) the document can be released to
FR - Formerly Restricted
RSEN - Risk Sensitive Notice
HCS-P - HUMINT Control System - Product - Human Intelligence provided by the CIA
SI - Special Intelligence - communications intercepts (formerly COMINT)
FISA - Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - Allows for the collection of foreign intelligence on domestic soil

CIPA - Classified Information Procedures Act - Statue where the Government needs to introduce classified documents that the defendant(s) needs to have access to, and allows the court to define the scope of use (if any) the defendants have with regards to the classified documents. ​

From @roadkit (https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/t...e-music-thread.2113440/page-294#post-41454036 post 7340)

Not to mention SCI: "Sensitive Compartmented Information" which encompasses a lot of what you have noted above.​

From @Bootsy Collins (https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/t...e-music-thread.2113440/page-294#post-41454072 post 7343)

IMO, for our purposes, all that matters is the level of classification, which is defined as:

CONFIDENTIAL -- disclosure is considered likely to damage national security.
SECRET -- disclosure is considered likely to cause serious damage to national security.
TOP SECRET -- disclosure is considered likely to cause exceptionally grave damage to national security.

Most of the rest of the information in classified document markings should not be considered as indicating the importance of the information contained within, or how bad things would be if it got out. That's the job of CONFIDENTIAL or SECRET or TOP SECRET. But just because you have a TS clearance doesn't mean it's OK for you to see anything and everything at that level. So most of the rest of the information in document markings -- SCI channels, dissemination caveats, etc. -- is meant to narrow the pool of people to whom it can be distributed. That's not because anything is "more secret than Top Secret" or anything like that, but simply because regardless of the level at which some info is classified, if there's no need for someone to look at something, then it's better if they don't -- the fewer people that know about something, obviously, the lower the likelihood of improper disclosure, whether intentional or accidental.​

And another from @Bootsy Collins, replying to roadkit (https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/t...e-music-thread.2113440/page-294#post-41454088 post 7344)

Only three of the things he listed are SCI channels; and if you're trying to understand document markings, "SCI" isn't really used as a document marking. If a document is to be handled within one or more SCI channels, identifiers for those specific channels will be included in the document markings.​

For people who are really interested in this for some reason, a 2012 version of the CAPCO guide is unclassified and posted on the DNI's website; it's the first result on a Google search.​

And here's the link: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/Public_CAPCO_Register and Manual v5.1.pdf

Jencks Act - basically, it means that the prosecution has to give the defense any material that could possibly discredit a witness the prosecution uses. This is for federal cases.

 

The only place he'd go would be to Scotland so he can play golf. But they don't want him (and if convicted, might deny him entry).

Here's a bit from the BBC

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65862990

To claim that these actions were taken in the objective interest of the law is laughable. Where was this interest with the Clintons or Hunter Biden?​

As we all say, if there are legit charges, then charge them.

 

The recording is very clear on intent. He's absolutely done on that considering that he had previously declassified documents. But which charge(s) does that apply to? Maybe one, maybe all.

I wonder if there is a plea on the table?

 

Updated to add CIPA

 

Nope. There is nothing in the Constitution that would prohibit him (or anyone) from running with a criminal conviction.

 

I doubt Trump will fire his next lawyer since so few want to work with him.