I'm almost finished reading this.... Definitely discussion about how important and expensive horses were. But at least around this age (Marshall served primarily under Henry II and then Richard) a knight usually had two horses max, unless he was ridiculously wealthy. Most weren't.
One of my DMs back in high school was notoriously picky about the mundane stuff of campaigning. How much food do you really have and how many torches. And if you drop that just before battle and you do have to run off, you gotta make new torches. Anyway, we spent lots of time worrying about horses, trying to buy new ones, having the old ones run off, because you know, wargs. Tedious as sh!t. We all wanted to DM him just to repay him for his shenanigans...
LOL, well, the fact that Asbridge does get into the weeds a bit on how expensive it was to be a knight wasn't meant to be a criticism (at least not akin to your tedious DM from high school...). It's actually a really good book---quite interesting. As were his two books about the Crusades. I'd highly recommend them. As an aside, I'll be in London next week, and will make a point to go to Temple Church to see Marshall's tomb.
LOL - we were the opposite Like when you got a horde of 1m GP by defeating end boss dragon, the DM would typically assume you just assembled a mule train to move the loot
Interesting. IIRC elsewhere they said there should be a wagon train for both the rohan army and the mordor army - so i guess that would mean the Rohan riders could just have 2 horses but all the kit and food etc would have to be moved up by wagon train
The same blog has extensive posts about how GOT battles are really badly written - especially the dothraki
Probably a big contributing factor in the difference is that Tolkien actually saw combat and was on the front lines at the Somme in the summer of 1916.
One of the greatest bits of flattery I've ever had was last year when my history advisor/mentor prof sent me a good bit of his library when he retired 23 years after my last course with him. We used to have lengthy discussions about movie battles compared with the real battles. Mostly they centered on Scotland, but others as well. I always wanted a history prof character to appear in The Walking Dead to demonstrate how to form a good schiltron - they'd be able to eliminate zombies far more efficiently and safely than anything they depicted.
Seriously, I never understood that Eagle point. Obviously Gandalf didn't trust humans, elves or dwarves to carry the ring, and he didn't even trust himself, so why would he trust eagles? He knew that a hobbit - the right hobbit- was his best bet, and yet even that hobbit failed at the end, and was lucky that Gollum bailed him out.
I don't think the plan was to give the ring to an Eagle - instead, you ask the Eagles to fly a small group (a hobbit or two, and maybe a wizard) to Mount Doom without telling them why.
But wasn’t the reason they could fly into Mordor in the first place is that the ring was already destroyed? Could they have done so if Sauron and the 9 and their fell beasts were still powerful?
Okay, fair enough, but that plan has its flaws too. The eye of Sauron is more likely to notice an Eagle and a wizard than a couple of hobbits. And besides, as you get closer to Mordor the eagle (who was a powerful being in that universe) might also perceive and be tempted by the growing power of the ring. Ultimately I think the answer is that Tolkien believed in divine providence, and by extension so did Gandalf, who orchestrated the whole plan. In Tolkien's universe, the ring was created and destroyed because that's how it was sung in Eru's song, and Gandalf understood that he, as well as Sauron, Frodo, Gollum etc. were merely the actors who were playing out Eru's song. So, Gandalf followed his instincts and chose Frodo.
The Nine had just been washed away by a flood (presuming that this discussion is taking place at the council of Elrond in Rivendell). It would be some months before they were back in Mordor ready to ride their flying beasts. And I don't think there was like a magic wall around Mordor - an Eagle flying over the mountains would certainly get the attention of the Eye, but what can the Eye do about it, blink real hard? Eagle gets in and out before any ground forces sent by Sauron can react. The other question is if Mount Doom was guarded. Frodo and Sam were only able to walk there unmolested because all the troops got called to the north gate when Aragorn came with the remains of the forces of the West after the battle of Minas Tirith. If there was a platoon of orcs on Mount Doom guard duty, that would be a pretty quick end to the story of the Eagles dropping hobbits off there. It's also likely the Eagles say no if Gandalf asks. "You want us to fly these pudgy little guys to Mount Doom? You're nuts. Have fun storming the castle." OK, this is a better point. Boromir never bore the Ring but he was tempted by it.
i mean the whole quest aspect doesn’t stand up too much scrutiny in the first place. i felt especially the idea of the eye being distracted was a bit hamfisted and the movie highlighted that.
even if the 9 were back on deck i don’t get the impression they were like the luftwaffe ready to scramble against a squadron of eagles. it’s hard to see how the eagle wouldn’t be at mt doom before sauron would have warning and could react. even if spies saw the eagles in bound they have no way to warn barad dur faster than eagles can fly also i didn’t get the feeling the eye is a literal thing that can see every enemy at a distance. my impression it was more supernatural and an evil presence.
Yeah. I had a similar reaction reading The Shining, where my dude is about to butcher his wife and kid, and then “OH NO!!! THE BOILER!!!” F******** you, Steven King.
Fair point. Are the Eagles more akin to Tom Bombadil? I kinda forget if they play much of a role at all in the rest of the lore. I kinda memory-holed them.
to give tolkien his credit he didn’t use plot armour, macguffins etc often but the eagles probably were a bit of a plot hole at the end.
Don't forget that in addition to the Nazgul there were many other spies, not just from Sauron but also from Saruman. The story makes it clear that the skies were being watched. What were Saruman's spy crows called? Crebain, I think.
it’s really obvious when you play MERP and see all the character stats written down why tolkien had to find plot devices to sideline powerful good guys. if they had all got together they’d be way too powerful.
The crows could fly directly to Orthanc, as they didi in the book, and from there the question is if Saruman would tell Sauron through the Palantir or not. But my point is not that the crows would beat an eagle, itt's just to point out one example of potential spies. Even the winds at Caradhras seem to be controlled by some sort of evil (which in the movies it is clearly attributed directly to Saruman, while in the books it's left more ambiguous). And an eagle would have no choice but to cross over the misty mountains somewhere, risking evil spirits that seemed to dwell up there, who might detect the ring. I don't think an eagle could pass through Moria.
To me the biggest plot-hole (although a clever one) is Gollum's miraculous intervention in Mount Doom. Without Gollum's convenient providential intervention, Frodo would have become every bit as much of a heroic failure as Paul Muad-dib. In different ways, both these great tales tell of a failure to withstand the pressure of great power.