I read a commentary about OT on dcunited.com and I agree with what the author was arguing. The thought that a team having been working hard for an hour an a half without stoppage (except for HT), and then if tied, facing the chances of not even gaining an important point by giving up a golden goal, seems unfair to say the least. Such is what DCU faced in Kansas City. After that game, Earnie Stewart seemed dismayed at the unique MLS OT rule, and I felt the same way. I think a club should be rewarded for ending regulation with a draw. OT should be done away with...something should be done...even if they made a simlar rule to what the NHL has would be an improvement--if regulation ends in a draw, there is a short OT, but BOTH teams get a single point for the tie and if one team wins in the OT period they get an additional point, but the losing team does not lose the one point they earned for ending regulation in a tie. Either way, something needs to be done. "If MLS can cope with the idea of a tied match after 100 minutes, then it can do so after ninety. In most cases, these games produce no more goals, and do not make soccer overall any more exciting. Overtime for regular season games is just a fake marketing device borrowed from too many other US sports. It should be scrapped at the next available opportunity." I was just wondering what anyone else thinks of this rule.