One way to tell if a player is ready for the MNT

Discussion in 'USA Men: News & Analysis' started by Nutmeg, Nov 10, 2003.

  1. NoSix

    NoSix Member+

    Feb 18, 2002
    Phoenix
    I agree with Serie Zed that fouls committed and offsides should count against the player (would be even better to consider only offensive fouls, but unfortunately the data aren't split out that way).

    I also think shots on goal is a more fundamental measure of a player's "danger" than goals, since it is less dependent on the goalkeeper.

    With this in mind, I calculated an Adjusted Shot on Goal and Adjusted Foul Suffered statistic to yield an Adjusted Danger Rating (ADR). And whadya know, Segroves favorite player tops the list...

    <br />
    </font><blockquote><pre><font face="verdana,arial,helvetica" size="1" >code:</font><hr><font size="2">

    RANK POS PLAYER ADR
    1 FWD Brian McBride 72.32
    2 FWD Carlos Ruiz 68.58
    3 MID DaMarcus Beasley 67.30
    4 MID Kyle Martino 60.89
    5 MID Jose Cancela 59.10
    6 MID Amado Guevara 57.77
    7 MID Preki 57.10
    8 FWD Ante Razov 54.84
    9 MID Ben Olsen 54.69
    10 FWD Taylor Twellman 54.15
    11 MID Cobi Jones 48.30
    12 FWD Damani Ralph 44.46
    13 MID Mark Chung 42.74
    14 MID Dema Kovalenko 42.40
    15 MID Marco Etcheverry 38.49
    16 MID Ricardo Clark 37.84
    17 MID Richard Mulrooney 37.52
    18 FWD Landon Donovan 37.26
    19 FWD Mike Magee 36.20
    20 FWD Pat Noonan 35.20
    21 FWD Chris Carrieri 34.25
    22 FWD John Spencer 33.59
    23 M/F Brian Mullan 33.32
    24 FWD Igor Simutenkov 32.72
    25 F/M Clint Mathis 32.45
    31 D/M Frankie Hejduk 29.59

    <hr></pre></blockquote><FONT face="arial, helvetica" size="2"></font></font></p>

    <p><font face="verdana,arial,helvetica" size="1" color="#666666">
    <br>
     
  2. beineke

    beineke New Member

    Sep 13, 2000
    This sounds like you're trying to come up with something like Voros's idea about baseball pitchers (where they are fundamentally responsible for defense-independent events: walks, strikeouts, and home runs). That's a commendable pursuit, but for goodness sakes, have you looked at the data?

    Prior to 2003
    Chris Albright 56 shots on goal
    Taylor Twellman 58 shots on goal

    Your measure says that Albright and Twellman were fundamentally equal, even though Albright had 4 goals and Twellman had 23!
     
  3. lurking

    lurking Member+

    Feb 9, 2002
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    A couple of things:

    - Clearly fouls are a second order concern in terms of offensive contribution, but they shouldnt be ignored. Unfortunately the tools for figuring out how important are not available. Additionally, while individually PKs drawn may not match up with fouls, as a group players who draw more fouls near the box are probably more likely to draw a PKs. Again, numbers arent available, but that also would increase a players production. Although a simpler solution is to just measure PKs drawn.

    - Shots, SOG and Goals all probably have their place in evaluating marksmanship, but how much variation is due to luck and how much due to a players accuracy can be hard to say in a short period. Clearly Pat Noonan is an accurate shooter, but is he as good as his statistics would suggest? Id be inclined to say probably not quite as good as he has shown, but that would be pure speculation.

    Really, soccer statistics arent really available, MLS as a whole has done as good a job as any league, but they arent ideal. There is also a lot of number crunching that can be done to try to identify signifigant statistical patterns, to understand the ones we do have. Like how much variation is there in shooting percentages between players?
     
  4. NoSix

    NoSix Member+

    Feb 18, 2002
    Phoenix
    Not necessarily. My "danger" measure is a function of Shots, Shots on Goal, Fouls Suffered, Fouls Committed, and Offsides. I haven't looked at Chris Albright's numbers, but it could be that differences in the other parameters would yield a significantly different rating for him compared to Twellman.

    Lurking has it absolutely right. Clearly shots and fouls by themselves are totally inadequate as danger measures, but those are the only individual offensive statistics MLS deigns to collect. In my view, passing, trapping, and dribbling are likely to be important components of "danger" that our current stats completely ignore. Still, it's interesting to see what falls out of the meager statistics we do have - note that according to this metric the top four "most dangerous" American forwards in MLS are McBride, Razov, Twellman, and Donovan.

    Edit: FWIW, for the 2003 season, Twellman ranks 10th, while Albright comes in at 33rd, lagging behind Taylor in both the shooting and foul-related components.
     
  5. NoSix

    NoSix Member+

    Feb 18, 2002
    Phoenix
    Oh, and another interesting tidbit, as I showed in the original table, Frankie Hejduk (!) is rated as the "most offensively dangerous" defender according to this criteria, and by a fairly wide margin over the next defender, Wes Hart who is ranked 41st. I rarely get to see the Crew play, but I'm left scratching my head trying to figure out why anyone would find it necessary to foul Frankie. ;-)
     
  6. beineke

    beineke New Member

    Sep 13, 2000
    Which, as I was pointing out, completely ignores goals scored. This kind of nonsensical rating system is what gives sports stats a bad name.
     
  7. beineke

    beineke New Member

    Sep 13, 2000
    I'm not really sure what you're saying here, but 2003 numbers for PK's drawn were tabulated by ChrisE over on the stats forum. It's also possible to tabulate some info about a lot of the free kicks that led to goals. Some (esp. direct free kicks) are likely to be mentioned in match reports, such as this one, where a goal followed a Rusty Pierce foul on Landon Donovan.
    www.cnnsi.com/soccer/us/news/2003/08/16/revs_quakes/

    This one was:
    Pierce on Donovan, 19 yds out, left of center, scored directly
     
  8. lurking

    lurking Member+

    Feb 9, 2002
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The fouls near the box that result in goals are easy to find because goals are pretty well documented. So are PKs, which is why you could account for the number of PKs drawn. The problem I see are counting the fouls around the box that do not result in goals, which are not well documented. I think the number of those fouls may be a better predictor of the future # of PKs a given player will draw on average than the number of PKs drawn in the past, since PKs are handed out infrequently and are hence subject to a high degree of random variation.
     
  9. beineke

    beineke New Member

    Sep 13, 2000
    Your last point (relating total fouls and PK's to fouls-near-the-box) is an excellent one ... even without data for non-goal-causing fouls, we could try and model this relationship. Wish I had more time to spend on it right now.
     
  10. NoSix

    NoSix Member+

    Feb 18, 2002
    Phoenix
    Let me remind you that the subject of this thread is whether a measure that is NOT goals is useful as an indicator of "dangerousness" in the sense of offensive prowess. There could be many explanations for why Twellman's ratio of goals to shots on goal is higher than Albright's - maybe on average Albright shoots from much further away from goal than Twellman does, maybe his shots on goal are higher and therefore easier to save, or maybe he is more prone to shoot directly at the keeper, or maybe you're right and your statistic proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that Twellman is "God" and Albright "sucks". I analyze soccer statistics because I enjoy doing so, not to please you, so why post if you have nothing constructive to add?
     
  11. beineke

    beineke New Member

    Sep 13, 2000
    I offered constructive criticism by pointing out that you can't sensibly pretend that shots on goal are a useful substitute for goals scored.

    Now, here are two questions for you:
    1) Why post to a thread that you don't seem to have read?
    2) Why post to a thread when you aren't interested in thinking about other people's response to your ideas?
     
  12. Nutmeg

    Nutmeg Member+

    Aug 24, 1999
    So just for fun, I decided to re-run these statistics for the teams that made it to the conference finals in MLS playoffs, and see how they compared to the regular season. I also thought Jamison's "threat level" (Named JTL) statistic was interesting, so I included it in this chart. The following is a table of every forward and midfielder who played at least 45 minuts on a team that made it to the conference championship:
    Code:
    [size=2]
    PLAYER   	MIN	PTS	FS	AP/90	AFS/90	JTL
    Justin Mapp	45	1	1	2.00	2.00	9.50
    Ante Razov	251	5	4	1.79	1.43	8.16
    Damani Ralph	273	3	13	0.99	4.29	7.99
    D Beasley	252	1	15	0.36	5.36	6.70
    Andy Williams	236	2	6	0.76	2.29	5.15
    Chris Armas	281	3	3	0.96	0.96	4.56
    Jesse Marsch	270	0	7	0.00	2.33	2.33
    						
    Igor Simutenkov	142	5	2	3.17	1.27	13.15
    Chris Klein	297	5	0	1.52	0.00	5.68
    Preki       	297	1	9	0.30	2.73	3.86
    Wolde Harris	261	2	3	0.69	1.03	3.62
    Kerry Zavagnin	297	1	6	0.30	1.82	2.95
    Alex Zotinca	90	0	1	0.00	1.00	1.00
    Eric Quill	186	0	2	0.00	0.97	0.97
    S Armstrong	130	0	1	0.00	0.69	0.69
    Josh Wolff	46	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
    						
    Jose Cancela	281	3	14	0.96	4.48	8.09
    Dario Fabbro	242	3	3	1.12	1.12	5.30
    Pat Noonan	281	4	1	1.28	0.32	5.12
    Jason Moore	140	0	6	0.00	3.86	3.86
    Shalrie Joseph	281	0	10	0.00	3.20	3.20
    Brian Kamler	138	0	2	0.00	1.30	1.30
    Steve Ralston	281	0	3	0.00	0.96	0.96
    						
    Landon Donovan	303	6	8	1.78	2.38	9.06
    Jamil Walker	167	3	4	1.62	2.16	8.22
    Rodrigo Faria	115	2	2	1.57	1.57	7.43
    Manny Lagos	145	2	2	1.24	1.24	5.90
    R Mulrooney	303	3	7	0.89	2.08	5.42
    Ian Russell	158	2	2	1.14	1.14	5.41
    Ramiro Corrales	72	0	3	0.00	3.75	3.75
    Brian Mullan	303	2	5	0.59	1.49	3.71
    Ronnie Ekelund	213	2	0	0.85	0.00	3.17
    D De Rosario	57	0	2	0.00	3.16	3.16
    [/size]
     
  13. Nutmeg

    Nutmeg Member+

    Aug 24, 1999
    Next comes a positional comparison. First up:

    forwards:
    Code:
    [size=2]
    PLAYER   	MIN	PTS	FS	AP/90	AFS/90	JTL
    Igor Simutenkov	142	5	2	3.17	1.27	13.15
    Landon Donovan	303	6	8	1.78	2.38	9.06
    Jamil Walker	167	3	4	1.62	2.16	8.22
    Ante Razov	251	5	4	1.79	1.43	8.16
    Damani Ralph	273	3	13	0.99	4.29	7.99
    Rodrigo Faria	115	2	2	1.57	1.57	7.43
    Dario Fabbro	242	3	3	1.12	1.12	5.30
    Pat Noonan	281	4	1	1.28	0.32	5.12
    Wolde Harris	261	2	3	0.69	1.03	3.62
    D De Rosario	57	0	2	0.00	3.16	3.16
    Josh Wolff	46	0	0	0.00	0.00	0.00
    [/size]
     
  14. Nutmeg

    Nutmeg Member+

    Aug 24, 1999
    wide midfielders:
    Code:
    [size=2]
    PLAYER   	MIN	PTS	FS	AP/90	AFS/90	JTL
    Justin Mapp	45	1	1	2.00	2.00	9.50
    D Beasley	252	1	15	0.36	5.36	6.70
    Manny Lagos	145	2	2	1.24	1.24	5.90
    Chris Klein	297	5	0	1.52	0.00	5.68
    Ian Russell	158	2	2	1.14	1.14	5.41
    Andy Williams	236	2	6	0.76	2.29	5.15
    Jason Moore	140	0	6	0.00	3.86	3.86
    Ramiro Corrales	72	0	3	0.00	3.75	3.75
    Brian Mullan	303	2	5	0.59	1.49	3.71
    Brian Kamler	138	0	2	0.00	1.30	1.30
    Alex Zotinca	90	0	1	0.00	1.00	1.00
    Eric Quill	186	0	2	0.00	0.97	0.97
    Steve Ralston	281	0	3	0.00	0.96	0.96
    S Armstrong	130	0	1	0.00	0.69	0.69
    [/size]
     
  15. Nutmeg

    Nutmeg Member+

    Aug 24, 1999
    defensive midfielders:
    Code:
    [size=2]
    PLAYER   	MIN	PTS	FS	AP/90	AFS/90	JTL
    R Mulrooney	303	3	7	0.89	2.08	5.42
    Chris Armas	281	3	3	0.96	0.96	4.56
    Shalrie Joseph	281	0	10	0.00	3.20	3.20
    Kerry Zavagnin	297	1	6	0.30	1.82	2.95
    Jesse Marsch	270	0	7	0.00	2.33	2.33
    [/size]
     
  16. Nutmeg

    Nutmeg Member+

    Aug 24, 1999
    attacking central midfielders:
    Code:
    [size=2]
    PLAYER   	MIN	PTS	FS	AP/90	AFS/90	JTL
    Jose Cancela	281	3	14	0.96	4.48	8.09
    Preki       	297	1	9	0.30	2.73	3.86
    Ronnie Ekelund	213	2	0	0.85	0.00	3.17
    [/size]
     

Share This Page