Ok, so what must Branko Boskovic accomplish until July to renew his fat DP contract?!

Discussion in 'D.C. United' started by 4mybroRRT, May 18, 2012.

  1. 4mybroRRT

    4mybroRRT Member

    Apr 10, 2001
    N. VA - DCU-land
    http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/artic...n-dcs-boskovic-finds-himself-playing-contract

    Or do we say a warm felt "Thank you for your services!" and look for another DP irregardless of what he accomplishes come July?

    How do you factor his injury-prone history with DCU when weighing your options?

    How do you factor if DCU needs a "playmaking #10" midfielder with DeRo playing the same position and being reliable, not injury - prone? Do you go with youngsters DeLeon, Najar, Pontios, maybe Neal being a gem, Cruz?
    Or do let Boskovic go and sign a younger DP you can blend in the youth movement, a la, Seattle's Montero or RSL Espindoza?

    Are there better options out there? Can we win without him? Do you offer a lesser, non-DP contract and say "take it or leave it" ?

    You would think we could spend that money on two quality non- DP players to improve our depth, ESP the back line. Or we could spend it on a younger, more reliable DP player come the summer transfer window.

    You have until July, not November, to decide...

    DCU Armchair GM...good luck!
     
  2. DC06

    DC06 Member+

    Oct 9, 2006
    Within amile of home
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    For me regardless of what he does between now and July his body of work can not warrant an extension at his current price. Be frank and say, we paid big money and you did not perform or were injured. Now, we'd be happy to keep you at 150-200K range and hope you come good for rest of 2012 and 2013. If you'd rather try the market, we wish you the best.

    If he stays at reduced rate, means we have him as option and some room to hopefully hang onto players or make some moves come next year.

    If he goes can lock down some players or make a signing or two.

    Branko could be a great addition, but we've learned to live without him, making him expendable and in weak bargaining position. No hard feelings, but it is the reality of sport as shown when Ben cleaned house this past off season (Simms, Quaranta, etc.).
     
    Barbieri and sussexcentralsoccer repped this.
  3. revelation

    revelation Member+

    Dec 17, 1998
    FC St. Pauli
    Club:
    FC Sankt Pauli
    First, he must recognize that 'irregardless' fails to be a word regardless of how many people would like to make it. Even if it were a word, the ir- prefix would change the meaning of regardless so that it would not mean what people insist it means. And yes, I am one of those Internet nuts that hates made up words and talks grammar-smack.

    Second, Boskovic has spent most of his time at DC United unfit and/or injured. We've never had the opportunity to actually see him play consistently so I withhold judgment on his actual playing ability. He seems at times to be useful but 45 minutes here and there doesn't strike me as enough evidence to determine his utility to the team.

    Finally, his contract is large by MLS standards. Given the value of his time versus production on the field, he either needs a smaller salary or to be cut. Nothing personal, just simply it doesn't make sense to have a guy on $500,000 around the team unless he is clearly worth it. Boskovic is not at this point (see point two above). Let him wander back to Europe, where some teams are likely to be able to offer him that size of contract without blinking (I don't know exactly how the £/week figures are calculated but he is on less than £10,000 per week if you figure for 52 weeks a year). Guys like Cruz or Deleon don't necessarily have Boskovic's skills but they are better values for the team with low salaries and high work output. We have a few highly skilled guys in DeRo, Pontius, Najar, and Dudar - we need to make sure that they are surrounded by solid journeymen without having to worry about our salary cap and it is clear that we could use a couple journeymen defenders right now...
     
  4. itwasi

    itwasi Member+

    May 9, 2008
    I don't know
    Club:
    DC United
    Personally, I think the decision has already been made to let him go. Olsen rarely uses Bosko when he can as either a stater or substitute. I see no reason why Bosko would want to stick around for the rest of the season at reduced salary other than he's personally unhappy about not contributing during his time here (as said in the most recent Capital Soccer Show podcast - it's great listen!). I doubt any player sticks around because their personal unhappy with what they've contributed, especially when that player can return to Europe get equal (maybe more) and the summer is the perfect time to do that, not in January.

    But he did perform well enough to get another shot, so I say he has to perform no less than he did against TFC and NE than he did against the Rapids. In fact he has to put improve a bit by gaining some stats (assists and goals). Bosko assisted on or scored 0 goals in his entire league play with United, which is 25 games since midseason 2010.
     
  5. Boloni86

    Boloni86 Member+

    Jun 7, 2000
    Baltimore
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    Gibraltar
    I think a good negotiating stance would be to offer him about $250,000 for another 2 years.

    If that doesn't jive with Branko then maybe offer him a 6 month extension of his current contract to see if he can prove he's worth more.

    Of course it's all irrelevant if Branko himself prefers to go back to Europe because I don't think we should have to jump through hoops to keep him. Branko also needs to show good faith and accept a pay cut because he did take a lot of money from DC in his last contract without a huge return
     
  6. 4mybroRRT

    4mybroRRT Member

    Apr 10, 2001
    N. VA - DCU-land
    Another thought to consider, DeRo will be missing games this summer for WCQ's. Heaven forbid he gets injured or develops a nagging hamstring injury. He's logging a lot of minutes for DCU. He's a core player for the Canadian National team so expect for him to play the full amount of minutes there.

    If he goes down, who's our consistent playmaker to play everything thru? I'm not sure Santos or Pontius are the guys to do it week in and week out. If we let Branko go or he balks at a pay reduction, Armchair GM, who do we bring in with a similar consistent playmaking skill set DCU can rely on to cover for DeRo's WCQ'S absences or a possible injury?

    "IR-regardless"...This Eastern Conference will be tight throughout the season and we can I'll-afford to not make a trade or sign possibly another DP this summer for the playoff push.

    Scounting trips planned for South America in June? Make a push for Lampard?

    We need to replace that skill set if Branko spreads his wings elsewhere. Too much of our season would rely on DeRo's health. If he goes down for an extended amount of time, DCU is not a playoff caliber team. deRo is our most consistent, proven, playmaker...bottom line. We should plan for the what if's now, not in July.

    Heaven forbid DeRo and Pontius develop nagging injuries, in and out of the lineup throughout the season, then DCU is really screwed.
     
    Barbieri and Q*bert Jones III repped this.
  7. Boloni86

    Boloni86 Member+

    Jun 7, 2000
    Baltimore
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    Gibraltar
    This is the biggest reason we would take a big hit if we lose Bosko. For all the depth that we have there's nobody else that can really pull the strings as the AM in a 4 man midfield if De Ro goes down. King and Wolff have had some ineffective minutes in that role, but they're both way out of position there. Pontius shouldn't even be part of the conversation for that role.

    So if Bosko leaves, it becomes imperative that we replace that role. The problem is that we won't have the $ to sign someone with a similar resume. There was a young Honduran CM who's name was thrown around earlier, but you better hope DC's scouting hits a home run because it'll be hard to replace De Ro's role as AM.

    And keep in mind that it won't take an injury to De Ro for us to need an option at AM. It could be something as simple as De Ro being needed as a forward/striker which in the long run would be a better fit for De Ro anyway
     
    benni... repped this.
  8. revelation

    revelation Member+

    Dec 17, 1998
    FC St. Pauli
    Club:
    FC Sankt Pauli
    I don't know what league you guys have been watching but MLS is not one where you can afford to have a quality attacking mid on the bench. If you are lucky, you have a guy that plays either out wide or at striker that can fill in if your central mid goes down to injury. If we lose DeRo, then it is hope and pray time.
     
  9. Boloni86

    Boloni86 Member+

    Jun 7, 2000
    Baltimore
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    Gibraltar
    The whole point is that Boskovic doesn't have to be a bench player. He can open up opportunities for De Ro to focus more on the withdrawn forward role. He can also help out as a left midfielder.
     
  10. nobletea

    nobletea Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 29, 2004
    HarCo
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I want him to build a stadium.
     
    Mighty! and revelation repped this.
  11. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    I expect them to decline to extend his current contract.

    But I also expect them to offer him another contract at a lower, non-DP salary.
     
    Barbieri repped this.
  12. D C B 2 3

    D C B 2 3 Member+

    Nov 18, 2007
    VA
    I expect what you expect.
     
  13. Potowmack

    Potowmack Member+

    Apr 2, 2010
    Washington, DC
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, that sounds about right. If he has a better offer somewhere else, he'll go. If not, he stays. No hard feelings either way.
     
  14. JeremyEritrea

    JeremyEritrea Member+

    Jun 29, 2006
    Takoma Park, MD
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think we should definitely get rid of one of the best players we've had the last three games as soon as possible.

    While we're at it, let's dump Salihi too.

    :rolleyes:
     
  15. nobletea

    nobletea Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 29, 2004
    HarCo
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I believe he got his first point tonight so Qbert should be pleased.
     
  16. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    The guy is certainly helping his case.

    I really think United should try to get him on a short term contract to finish the season. If he continues to improve -- well, we'll see what happens.
     
  17. Footer Phooter

    Jul 23, 2000
    Falls Church, VA
    Agreed. I can live with him not coming back next year. I'd love to see him finish the season, though.
     
  18. jason1551

    jason1551 Member+

    Apr 9, 2003
    Columbus, GA
    Club:
    DC United
    The first thing he needs to do is build a time machine and go back and take out the NE player who ruined his 2011 season. Barring that, he needs to get at least a few assists or goals to justify re-signing him in the first place. If he does, I think we ask him to take a paycut large enough to afford some defensive signings.

    In an ideal world, he re-signs at $180-200K, we sign Nelsen as a player/coach for $150-175K (pro-rated), and go after a wingback. If all that happens, I think Jakovic becomes expendable as a trade asset (if he stays healthy) to pick up whatever else we might need. If we don't get Nelsen (which is at least 50/50, IMO), we need depth at outside back and a more dynamic CM sub than King. We were rumored to be after a Honduran, so he could be the fallback plan if Boskovic doesn't get re-signed in the summer.

    In any case, I think what happens with Boskovic will be the first in a series of moves over the summer to further strenghten the squad down the final stretch.
     
    tallguy repped this.
  19. Heist

    Heist Member+

    Jun 15, 2001
    Virginia
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I expect both of you will be correct in your expectations.
     
  20. Eastern Bear

    Eastern Bear Member+

    Feb 27, 1999
    Great Falls, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Bosko needs PT to get a contract somewhere else. I agree that he'll sign 'til the end of the season and then go from there. Probably leaves the team though.
     
  21. bigredfutbol

    bigredfutbol Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 5, 2000
    Woodbridge, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    He makes the team better, and my gut feeling is that Salihi will perform better if he sticks around. I hope he stays.

    I'm afraid Olsen doesn't see it that way.
     
  22. 4mybroRRT

    4mybroRRT Member

    Apr 10, 2001
    N. VA - DCU-land
    After seeing that Correa kid from Chivas slice up the Galaxy last night, I'm all the more convince the better playoff bound teams of the West (Seattle, RSL specifically) are going after younger, faster, more athletic DPs, probably more affordable, and can attack the box from anywhere.

    He was all over that pitch...unstoppable. He's clearly the future of DPs in the league if you're not going for the household name DP.

    That Correa kid with DeRo, Pontius, DeLeon, and Najar/Cruz would be an OMG moments galore for MLS defenses abound.

    Make Wolff a coach in July and free up both his and Bosko's salaries against our cap.

    Hop on plane and find a Correa come July!
     
  23. bigredfutbol

    bigredfutbol Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 5, 2000
    Woodbridge, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We've got younger, faster players up the wazoo. What's wrong with an experienced old fart who knows how to calm things down and play some smart balls?
     
    Mighty!, stangspritzring and pr0ner repped this.
  24. 4mybroRRT

    4mybroRRT Member

    Apr 10, 2001
    N. VA - DCU-land
    Hey can anyone find out how many full 90 minutes matches Branko has played during his contract with DCU thru last night's game?

    I was going back and forth with a compatriot that the number was less than 10 matches ( in what is it... 2 or 3 years?)

    Then divide that number into his salary...we're looking at $40 or $45K per match?!
     
  25. 4mybroRRT

    4mybroRRT Member

    Apr 10, 2001
    N. VA - DCU-land
    I have no problem with it...just not at his salary for the number of matches he's played.

    He's a nice player, but frankly he's been DP money WASTED considering his production. I believe we can spend better for the money. I would love for Branko to stay and play his 66% of our season again. But for 66% of the salary...
     

Share This Page