Official Red Bulls offseason thread

Discussion in 'New York Red Bulls' started by tigersoccer2005, Nov 29, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    All part of the 300 page plan.
     
  2. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think the entire fan base agrees with you.
     
  3. jeremydneezy

    jeremydneezy Member

    Dec 12, 2011
    Greenville, SC
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I would never advocate throwing Miazga out there without him first earning the minutes in training or through performance, but he definitely has future MLS starter written all over him. He made some glaring mistakes, sure, but that stuff is to be expected with a guy who turned 19 during last season.
    The important thing is he has time to grow over the next 2-3 years and become a legitimate rock back there. He has good feet, he's good in the air and naturally athletic and he opens his hips, turns with minimal fuss and accelerates. That stuff can't be taught and when he irons out the kinks through increased playing time and natural maturation we'll be looking at a solid CB.
    I thought he played very well in the U20 qualifying and his confidence was apparent at that level. Once he gets more confidence against MLS attackers we'll see him blossom.
     
    MetroChile repped this.
  4. MetroChile

    MetroChile Member+

    Jan 13, 2001
    NJ; Valpo.
    Club:
    Santiago Wanderers
    Nat'l Team:
    Chile
    Yea, you can't be too harsh on a 19 YO CB. Seemingly he's got the tools (Miazga).
     
  5. metz

    metz Member

    Jan 17, 2003
    Whit the RBNY II now http://www.bigapplesoccer.com/teams/redbulls2.php?article_id=40099 they will have chance to develop this players and give them the minutes they need, this it is a big step and glad that finally the RBNY are thinking with the head and not with beverage can on mind......
     
  6. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This is one of the most important if not THE MOST important developments in MLS history.

    Can someone clear up the league mandate on the usl teams for me? At first I thought red bull was doing this of their own volition.
     
  7. iced1776

    iced1776 Member+

    Dec 4, 2009
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    As far as I know, MLS teams have to either 1) start their own USL PRO team, or 2) affiliate with an established team, although I don't believe it had to be a USL PRO team.

    No idea what the consequences would be for failing to do so
     
  8. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Right. So...

    They didn't have to fund their own team. They could have gone with a cheaper affiliation option. So for that I give them props.

    However, I seriously doubt they would have done anything at all if the league hadn't mandated it.
     
  9. iced1776

    iced1776 Member+

    Dec 4, 2009
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Oh yeah, no doubt, Roxburgh basically said as much if I recall correctly. Seemed like they were leaning towards the affiliate for a good amount of last year, not sure what made them swing towards their USL Pro team either.

    To me, going the affiliate route seems like a total waste of time. It would likely just amount to the equivalent of a few mid-season loans, and we saw how well that worked out with Lade...
     
  10. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I actually have a theory on that which ties into the failure of red bull and the ESC to combine their efforts on branding the USL side.

    My theory is that red bull did not want to give any marketing power to an affiliate club. They wanted red bull colors, designs, etc. Full control.

    Red bull after all is most concerned with their brand. Not their soccer.

    That OR they are sweetening the infrastructure pot for a potential buyer. In which case a private team would be more appealing than an affiliation. A buyer can walk in and have all the infrastructure, facilities, etc. ready to go. All they have to do is change the sign on the door.
     
    MetroChile repped this.
  11. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Oct 28, 2001
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Why would a team even consider branding a team anything other than in the style of the parent club?

    New York Red Bulls II is a perfect name.
     
    Doctor Worm repped this.
  12. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's a unique situation to this franchise where they could have done damage control and reconnected themselves with the die hards.

    It's boring, but who cares. We have a USL team. Moving on...
     
  13. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Oct 28, 2001
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's supposed to be boring, it's a reserve team.

    There are many ways the team can work to improve its relationship with the fan base. I don't think any of them should involve the name of a reserve team.
     
  14. metz

    metz Member

    Jan 17, 2003
    The affiliate idea was a idiot idea, the own second team is the way to go, now instead of 30 players they can have 60 a lot of player where to choice 18 players for each game and a place to rehabilitate and develop players.....
     
  15. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Like I said: who cares. I don't. But apparently red bull did. Enough to invite the ESC in only to tell them "our way or the highway"...per usual.
     
  16. Woodrow

    Woodrow Member+

    Dec 7, 2001
    Brick City
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
  17. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's gonna be a "sell out"!
     
  18. Woodrow

    Woodrow Member+

    Dec 7, 2001
    Brick City
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Well, at least it is officially someone else's problem. I'm sure this is going to come down to money, but it sure seems like he flat out doesn't want to play for Montreal.
     
  19. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Weird situation which we'll probably never know the details to. But yes, it sure sounds like he hates the idea of playing in Montreal. That or there is some sort of financial issue we aren't aware of.
     
  20. Metrosuccess

    Metrosuccess Member

    Jan 6, 2000
    NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Watch us get screwed on this Oypngo trade by M L S with their idiotic rules....
     
  21. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Would not surprise me in the least.
     
  22. Woodrow

    Woodrow Member+

    Dec 7, 2001
    Brick City
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
  23. kokoplus10

    kokoplus10 Member+

    Feb 5, 2008
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Weird to cut him but not announce if he'll be part of the USL side.
     
  24. Woodrow

    Woodrow Member+

    Dec 7, 2001
    Brick City
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Disjointedness is one of the hallmarks of this franchise.
     
    kokoplus10 repped this.

Share This Page