Nothing here negates the assertion that the U.S. has a much better women’s soccer culture than Europe. The MLS thing is a red herring. As you note: 30 teams. It’s not just about attendance. Nwsl has a 240 million tv contract. What is the stand alone fmv of nwsl teams vs teams in any other country. And the fact that there is a much greater women’s sports culture here doesn’t negate that soccer is part of that. I think it’s kind of crazy that the women’s soccer milieu is always talking about valuing women’s sports, but there are players that claim the culture wrt women’s soccer is superior in another country.
If just going with just the words ‘soccer culture’ in woso, the there’s a few individual Scandinavian countries that stand out above us, but can have an harder time competing do their rather smallish populations. The US has considerable advantage that we’ve made especially woso into a popular participation sport but by far the number reason is why the USWNT on top is MONEY, in our American multi sports crazy society, we simply pour it on everything we can get our hands—even very minor sports m…and this includes whether it’s our local oligarch(Michelle Kang) or individual parents that take it to extremes(Moultri’s rich dad) or even as you pointed out cable tv dishing out on something like the low ratings NWSL
@RalleeMonkey if I’m going with what’s most important to the rest of the world, the focus is usually on either England’s NT or their WSL league. Actually the biggest story right now in woso is on their former NT goalkeeper, Mary Earps, who wrote an tell all book which seems to have steered a lot controversy—though dunno an idea why or care to know—-but sayin, the NWSL is not the main focus anymore to the outside world
What I think you are getting at is the difference between being a fan of soccer, in general, and a fan of women's soccer, specifically. I prefer the women's game, but it doesn't mean I don't watch men's soccer. In fact, I pay attention to both the women's and men's side of Tottenham. And as a Tottenham fan, I also check out the highlights of Bayern Munich men's team because of Harry Kane. Conversely, since DAZN is no longer showing highlights of the French league, I generally don't watch the 2min highlights of Lyonnes that they put out themselves. The point is that culture is not uniform across genders or fans or nations. For one person, culture could be living and breathing football. For another, it could be support of a team or club or league. And for another it could be gender based. But one of the things I think that the players talk about when talking about culture also includes attendance. Looking at the top club attendances for a single match, NWSL is 42,054 in June 2023 (Seattle v. Portland). It is only the 18th most attended single match for a club team. And all of the others were in soccer specific stadiums (and even Lumen Field is not soccer specific). There just aren't soccer specific stadiums in the US that can accommodate 40k or 50k...or 90k fans*. Yes, other stadiums can, but there are no soccer specific stadiums that can. So, the Arsenal women's team can play at Emerites, which they often do, and get 40k in a soccer specific stadium. Chelsea could play at Stamford Bridge and get a 30k or a 40k (sellout) crowd. And that is part of the culture which doesn't exist in the US. (And I am well aware of the attendance in teams and league of NWSL. It's an argument I make on players playing in NWSL and not elsewhere.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women's_association_football_attendance_records Now, I'm not saying that the culture in the US is less. Everybody talking about playing in Kansas City during the recent women's national team match v. New Zealand seemed really excited to be there. And it seemed that part of it was the stadium, itself, built specifically for women. That type of culture doesn't exist anywhere else outside of Kansas City, which is in the US. And in the US there is a push for that kind of recognition for women's soccer. So the question of culture is complicated, and can vary from person to person. edit - WSL has a reported £65m contract with Sky Sport for the next 5 years, inclusive. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...tic-five-year-tv-deal-with-sky-sports-and-bbc * - A special note needs to be made for New White Heart Lane. That stadium was built for the Tottenham men's team, and also to accommodate NFL games. So I'm classifying that as a soccer specific stadium because of what team it was built for. Similar to Lumen Field, which was built for the Seahawks.
Just realized you're a Brit. There is no positive statement about the US or US culture that you won't challenge. That's ok, we're used to it. I'll just reiterate that Title IX changed the world and leave it at that. Nice that you're on the NWSL/USWNT boards. Peace.
I think there's a difference between getting very large attendance for a single game and having large attendance game-in-and-game-out. When I think about soccer culture, I think about game-in-and-game-out, which is where fans are crazy soccer nuts.
It is just two countries separated by a common language, and a little pond. BTW: I also follow women's soccer more than men's but mainly because I have aged out of being able to easily keep up with the excessive speed of the men's game in many cases. I may switch to following rugby as the play is MUCH shower. Or I may go to real extremes and follow curling exclusively. That is slow enough that I might get in a nap during the "action."
lol. No, I'm a Yank. Just had about 35 years of European soccer. But the point I had about playing in large stadiums that are soccer specific are related to the rest of the world as compared to the US. And I'm thinking about playing. I never played at a high level at any point, but I remember a high school match against our rivals in which we actually had a lot of supporters show up far beyond our parents and that was exciting. And when I was at UMd, we had a team that was challenging for national title (the Taylor Twellman days). One match v. Virginia, who was #1 at that point, was played at home and a bunch of us soccer fans brought pots and spoons to make noise. It was a great atmosphere, with the fans at standing room only. And it was loud. It was fun, and talking to a few of the players after, and a few days later while walking across campus, they really enjoyed it as well. So that is what I'm talking about when I'm talking size. The clubs in a lot of Europe all have those possibilities, apart from a few like London City. In the US, it has to be a special occasion to get a crowd above 20k (give or take). I think you really misunderstand my perspective. I have been a huge supporter of things like Title IX and women's sports (and more broadly, women's equality). But I'm not going to say that something like culture, which is not really defined in any way, is better here than elsewhere. And in my post, I clearly caveated why it is not better here in specific ways. But there are ways in which it is. And since the A Thompson transfer saga, I have been arguing that it is not a time to panic and that we do have a very healthy league. But what I am inferring is that soccer is not culturally present across the board like it is in Europe. We have a lot of other competing sports that are more popular. Yet we also have a bigger and better women's league than anywhere else, and one of the best national teams. Those things don't exist if there was not a culture for women's soccer. And I am really happy that my "home" club of Denver is building their own stadium. I don't know if it is like KC and built for women. But I would guess it is, and that makes me excited. I'm a fan of women's soccer as, to me, the players seem to play it as a team sport with a bunch of individuals rather than the men's game, which is a team of individuals who happen to be in the same uniform. And I've always seen the sport that way, as it being a team effort.
"In the US, it has to be a special occasion to get a crowd above 20k (give or take)." It is the same in England for women. Chelsea women barely draw 3,000. Arsenal is the only club that draws well in Europe.
Ugh. For several months I have been talking about how the attendance in NWSL is larger, on average, than in any other league. I also thought I had pointed out here (I could have been somebody else, or it could have been elsewhere) that in average attendance, that Portland is second to Arsenal. And I would suspect that the top NWSL teams in terms of average attendance are larger than anybody else other than Arsenal and other NWSL teams. Also, I have also been talking about, at the professional level, of soccer specific stadiums. Unless I'm missing things, the largest soccer specific stadium in the US is where the LA Galaxy play at 27k. Looking at the five biggest leagues in Europe, 27k is, overall, in the bottom third (eyeball reading). And when looking at the list of largest attendances for women's club matches, they all play in soccer specific stadiums of the men's side. We have to look all the way down to Portland playing at Providence Park, and that is just over 25k, to see a soccer specific stadium. Now, I'm talking about culture, here, not just raw attendance. One of the things that really struck me about this past international break was about how the US players as well as Hayes talked about playing in KC. To us the term we are discussing, they talked about the overall culture surrounding playing at KC. Now, I don't follow the ins and outs of everyday discussion in other leagues, but I don't get the feeling that that kind of culture exists anywhere else. And I also get that what NWSL and the player's association and that Yates Report have all done is address the culture of women's soccer in the US, and how it can and has improved. I don't think this is the case elsewhere in the world.
I tol' y'all to look out for Fisher! Now if she can just get through next season w/o a red card. Btw, way OT, I wonder if the rules re: tackling should be different somehow in the women's game. Everyone knows women's acl's are much more susceptible to injury. That tackle on Croix had me cringing. No, I don't know what the rule change would be. Edit: Why does Bloomer never get a shout as someone that should be called up? I don't get to watch as much as I'd like, but she looks like a damn good keeper to me. And, her Sofascore ratings are sky high. Someone help me.
at least six WSL clubs are based in London so they definitely got to share the woso fan base as compared just one NWSL club per metro area. And then it’s something like 70% foreigners compare to only 30% English start in the WSL, which can be annoying to some. There signs in the rest of Europe that things are picking up; Bayern Munich had 57K in their season opener, but then goes back to their training facility (with only 2.5K capacity) for most of the season. Barca got 90K at one Champions League match, but that was mostly due to letting in free, men’s side regular season ticket holders.
Correct. But Arsenal has managed to draw in London where Chelsea has not, despite Chelsea regularly winning the league.
US-eligible NWSL - End of (regular) season Goals: 10 - Sears (2nd yr) 8 - Tiernan (R), Moultrie (20 y.o.) 6 - Alyssa, Adames (2nd yr, 19 y.o.), Hatch, Cooper (2nd year), Hocking 5 - Turner (2nd year), Rodman, Labonta, Lavelle Assists League leader 6 6 - Rodriguez 5 - Schupansky (R), Mace, Gisele (2nd yr), Schlegel, Malonson 4 - Staab, Malanson, Coffey, 3 Kennedy Fuller (2nd yr), Gareis, G. Thompson, Coffey, Cooper (2nd yr), Malonson, Conti, Graham (rookie), Demelo, Peterson, Dahlien Goal contributions: 12 Sears (2nd yr) 9 Tiernan (R), Cooper (2nd yr), Moultrie 8 Alyssa, Dahlien (R), Schlegel 7 Rodriguez, Fuller, Schlegel, Fuller, Ryan, Hocking, McCutcheon 6 Turner, Schupansky, Conti, Graham, Staab, Rodman, Fisher, Giselle, Coffey, Malonson, Lavell, Shaw 5 Ascanio, Demelo, Flint, Patterson, Mace, Howell
last regular season weekend (last week) US-eligibles in Sofascore Best 11 ------------------------------x Speck----------------Lavelle-------------Schlegel ---------------x---------------------Hutton x-----------Wright-----------Bugg------------Milliet ----------------------McGlynn US-eligibles in Sofascore PotY rankings 2. Flint 3. Alyssa 5. Bloomer 6. Howell 7. Moultrie 10. Lavelle 11. Cooper 16. Coffey 18. Rodman 19. Demelo 20. Rodriguez 22. Ryan 23. Hutton 24. McKeown 26. Lobanta
Watched KC v. Gotham. Kinda feel bad for KC losing that match w/o their best player and another of their best players. was a slog until late in the match when Gotham went defensive. My impressions of the players. Sentnor played to form. Snapped off a nice shot from the top of the box, had the ball with acres of space, got run down from behind. Otherwise almost nothing to see. I started off a big fan. Now I think she shouldn't be called up until we know what she can contribute. Shaw, wonderful goal, though Sharples totally misplayed the initial ball to her. Not much else. Purce looks like she's fully fit. Not much to note. Rose was damn good. I hadn't noticed that she's developed some tight space tricks. Really good at pulling the ball back and leaving the defender behind when she's moving laterally. And she played all 120 minutes. She's going to be gassed in their next match. Gotta credit all of the Gotham ball possessors, including, Shaw, Howell, Schupansky, Reale, Purce (I'm sure I'm missing someone). They dominated KC until their (Gotham's) manager decided to park the bus. Reale is so much better with the ball than she looks like she would be. On the left, it looked like she interchanged with Portilho and Schupansky pretty freely. Sonnett is such a warrior. She's lost a step, but dang, if I'm walking down a dark alley, I want her by my side. Got the assist on a long line breaking pass to Shaw (who still had a ton of work to do) Stengel's goal was brilliant. Slotted it in from a very wide angle. Were totally dominated until Gotham parked the bus. Hutton and Lobanta were basically invisible. I didn't pay much attention to formations, but it was as if Gotham had four mids to KC's two. Then, everything changed. Hutton and especially Lobanta, were like a boxer that gets a second wind in the late rounds. Lobanta was just pulling the team up by their bootstraps. Was disappointed not to see Izzy contribute much of anything to KC's offense. Like, between Izzy and Reale, Reale was the much more noticeable player, for the right reasons. Wheeler's goal was class. Corner of the box, cut it back to her left and slotted it. She took several shots after that, often trying the same move. But, Gotham were wise to it.
The WSL ticket is also extremely cheap espeically when playing in larger stadium. While the NWSL ticket can be pretty much more costly, especially in Washington, Portland and a few other well-sold markets.
What's the breakdown on Moultrie throught the year? There have been a couple of off-handed comments during matches about how much she has improved this year and I'm curious if that is reflected here.
8 goals + 1 assists in the regular season, one assist in the quarterfinal. Plus drawing two PKs. Her improved topline stats attract public attention but her biggest improvement this year is her fitness, she was troubled by ankle and knee injury last season. She has been very good since 2023, but she received more recognition when she scores more goals.
On an August leaderboard, Moultrie was tied with a passel of other US-eligibles at 10th place on the US-eligible goal scoring leaderboard. And, she wasn't on the goal contribution leaderboard at all. She was 10th on Sofascore's PotY leaderboard, and finished 6th I believe. She had a hell of a second half of the season. I'm 60 minutes through the Thorns vs. Wave playoff. To me, Moultrie looks like clearly the most influential player on the field. And, as Chirin noted, her fitness is off the charts. The WNT has so many midfielders, but watching this match, I feel like theres's no way you could keep Olivia off of a tournament roster at this point. And, dang, you do you keep her off the pitch?
I can't help remembering when, a few years ago, when Olivia Moultrie appeared as the youngest ever player in NWSL, someone was questioning the hype and claiming that she just was a wannabe wunderkind who lived on her parents' support and obsession...
If I remember the storyline, at already the age of eleven she got recruited & signed a letter of intent to play at U of North Carolina(20 times NCAA champs). But she made bigger/national headlines a few years later( around early 2019) Nike signed her to an $300K contract even though she was just 13 & just playing(what we call over here)independent select/travel soccer—which is something parents pay for instead of the other way around. About this time, plenty of YouTube vids started showing up on her. One that I watched on her home lifestyle had her living what looked like a near mansion with a state of the art, soccer field build in her backyard. She was also home schooled so to spend more time practicing soccer. Later that same year, her dad moved the family from California to Portland to be closer to the Thorns & would end up successfully suing the NWSL with his own money to force the league to lower the age limit so she could start playing at 15. There was also a story that he was contemplating a move to Lyon to be closer to that prestigious club, but then decided on Portland instead. So she definitely had the potential as early as eleven, but her success was do done with a lot of money from her presumed, wealthy dad who was willing to uproot the whole family for success. Sorta similar wise, Macario’s dad was an doctor(this assumption here would mean he was reasonably wealthy) moved Macario at age 12 & the rest of his family from Brazil to USA so she could partake in our better off, female soccer system—and it certainly paid off dividends as she just signed an $10 million contract with NIke
It just occurred to me that without Wilson this season it may have been a void that Moultrie really helped to fill and that was an achievement that kept growing and culminated in last weekend's performance and was complemented by her growth on the national team. But during the season we kept hearing how Moultrie was breaking many of the teenage records set by other really precocious predecessors --Thompson or Kerr? She's been in the league so long as a teenage player that is an achievement in an of itself.
Mom is the doctor and stayed in Brazil (because it's hard to change to the US medical system unless you are educated here).
I think her first half performance was already extremely good. She created most number of shooting opportunities in the league only rivalled by Girma. If Turner had a better year in finishing, her Assist number will be much higher. The floodgate will always open, it just openned in the second half of this season.