Rumor: News/Rumor: 2024 Chicago Fire Roster Speculation

Discussion in 'Chicago Fire' started by willydonc, Mar 1, 2023.

  1. juicecrewallstar

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    Mar 1, 2019
    I thought I saw James was pushing to get back to Europe
     
  2. lurak

    lurak Member+

    Aug 24, 2007
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    The last I remember is that the 31 roster spots are full so someone needs to leave in order to bring someone in. Unfortunately, no one wants any of the players on the Fire right now. It is possible that teams are inquiring about Guti, Brady, Teran, and possibly Shaqiri. I'm sure Heitz does not want to part with the first 3.

    Every other player on the Fire with an expiring contract is probably too expensive. The only way someone moves is through a mutual termination of the existing contract and the player negotiating a new contract with another club. I do not think that anyone on the Fire with an expiring contract would like to take that risk right now.
     
    willydonc repped this.
  3. Except for Wootton all loaned players still take up their respective roster spots. To bring a player on, someone has to leave.

    There are no offers for Shaqiri.
     
    schroncar repped this.
  4. juicecrewallstar

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    Mar 1, 2019
    re: woodson and a roster spot, this chart is why I thought we had one more supplemental roster spot

    if woodson does not count as a slot, wouldn't that supplemental roster position be open? would glasgow be eligible for it?
     
  5. schroncar

    schroncar Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Mar 2, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I am not too knowledgeable on this, but I thought that “slot 31” player was not allowed to play for Fire I and is just a player waiting for a slot to open up next year.
    If this is correct, then not a solution to allow Glasgow to play.
     
  6. juicecrewallstar

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    Mar 1, 2019
    could be!

    would be nice to drop Gal from the supplemental roster and replace him with Glasgow
     
  7. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    We are going into the last week of the Summer Transfer Window.

    With nothing going on (for the Fire, a ton of players transferring in and out of other MLS Clubs! Giroud, Greizmann, Reus, and a ton of players who are not "stars" for their respective national teams), it looks like we have to make up some things to entertain ourselves.

    https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/2...fer-news-rumors.2129524/page-16#post-42447676


    We certainly don't have any Chicago Fire soccer on the horizon.

    Nope, there certainly do not seem to be any offers for Xherdan Shaqiri, at least none made known to us.:whistling::notworthy:

    Similarly, we should ask:
    Any offers for Gaston Gimenez? :mad:
    Any offers for Souquet? :confused:
    Any offers for Navarro? o_O
    Any offers for 'Mighty' Tom Barlow? :eek:
     
    schroncar repped this.
  8. There's still 10 supplemental roster spots consumed. IDK why Gaspar couldn't have been moved to the Season Ending Injury list, unless he's not really hurt (only bad) and they can't move him.
     
    schroncar and juicecrewallstar repped this.
  9. [QUOTE="xtomx, post: 42448108, member: 17201"
    Nope, there certainly do not seem to be any offers for Xherdan Shaqiri, at least none made known to us.:whistling::notworthy:

    Similarly, we should ask:
    Any offers for Gaston Gimenez? :mad:
    Any offers for Souquet? :confused:
    Any offers for Navarro? o_O
    Any offers for 'Mighty' Tom Barlow? :eek:[/QUOTE]
    Because none of them have enough value at their current salaries (all guaranteed through NEXT season) to take on a free. That says a lot about how well our sporting staff values players.
     
    xtomx repped this.
  10. schroncar

    schroncar Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Mar 2, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Any offers for Heitz? How much would we have to pay to get him gone?
     
    goldclover and xtomx repped this.
  11. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    About the same as Gimenez, I suspect.
     
  12. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    https://www.givemesport.com/mls-transfers-notebook-moves-watch-deadline-day/

    #GriezmannWatch
    Will LAFC land Antoine Griezmann this window or next?

    Atlanta United's Designated Player hunt
    Garth Lagerwey & Co. are seeking an attacker worthy of a DP tag

    Charlotte FC chasing DP No. 10
    The club is eyeing an attacking midfielder before Deadline Day

    Can FC Cincinnati Fill Open DP Slot?
    Boupendza's contract termination opens a key roster slot

    Red Bulls Reinforcements?
    Sources say that RBNY are prioritizing two new additions

    Revolution Set to Land Nigerian Central Midfielder
    Alhassan Yusuf helped Royal Antwerp win the Belgian title in 2022-23

    Reus, Goncalves a Matter of Time
    Deals for two talents are due to be announced in the coming days
     
    xtomx repped this.
  13. xtomx

    xtomx Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Sep 6, 2001
    Northern Wisconsin, but not far from civilization
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    #3163 xtomx, Aug 14, 2024
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2024
    MLS Cup, nay, WORLD CUP
    HERE WE COME!

    We just paid $75,000 (maybe $150,000) journeyman with 143 appearance over NINE seasons in MLS.

    He is earning $260,000.00 this season, slightly less than "Mighty" Tom Barlow!

    https://www.mlssoccer.com/players/ariel-lassiter/

    He seems to have been a pretty regular starter for Montreal since they picked him up from Miami.

    His Transfermakt value is 800,000.

    https://www.transfermarkt.us/ariel-lassiter/profil/spieler/329713

    [​IMG]

    Chicago Fire FC today announced that the Club has acquired winger Ariel Lassiter from CF Montréal. In exchange, Montréal will receive $75,000 in 2024 General Allocation Money (GAM) and could receive an additional $75,000 in 2025 GAM if certain player performance conditions are met. Lassiter is under contract with the Fire through the remainder of the 2024 season.

    “Going into the final stretch of the regular season, we wanted to add a versatile player with MLS experience to strengthen our playoff push,” said Chicago Fire FC Sporting Director Georg Heitz. “Ariel will bring more competition and flexibility to the team, as he can play multiple positions. We look forward to welcoming him to the Club in the coming days.”

    Lassiter, 29, joins the Fire after spending the past two seasons with Montréal, where he made 56 appearances across all competitions, tallying five goals and 10 assists. Overall, Lassiter has made 143 appearances (72 starts) in MLS play, featuring for the LA Galaxy (2015‑18), Houston Dynamo (2020‑21), Inter Miami CF (2022‑23) and Montréal (2023‑24).
     
    Mac97 repped this.
  14. Mac97

    Mac97 Member+

    Jul 15, 2014
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    So, does this mean that we couldn't bring in Glasgow because the two-week signing deals are maxed out, or did the Fire just dis Glasgow?
     
  15. overlap_old_coach

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    May 2, 2022
    That’s a somewhat puzzling move…

    In that we just freed up 1 roster spot, a ton of salary and a DP tag…and we bring in someone to battle MHS and Mueller for PT?

    Maybe MHS is now considered only as a second striker and Lassiter can also play LB?
     
    goldclover repped this.
  16. goldclover

    goldclover Member+

    Mar 25, 2010
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    He was only signed til the end of the season. I have already written this season off (though will watch every game) and frankly want us to figure out what to do for next season...until we have the GM and potential coach change...I am not sure I want many moves done.
     
    juicecrewallstar repped this.
  17. Pennsylvania Dave

    Jul 31, 2012
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    This is what I want to know. When I heard Shaq was gone my immediate response was bring Glasgow up to the first team and give him 8 or 9 run outs. Instead they get a journeyman to play wing? This doesn't seem like a "building for the future" move to me so in that sense I don't understand it. I agree the Fire need a winger but unless there's something preventing Glasgow from coming up I don't really get it?
     
    goldclover and overlap_old_coach repped this.
  18. overlap_old_coach

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    May 2, 2022


    Hmm...certainly would suggest Guti will now have "full" 10 responsibilities
    upload_2024-8-14_19-13-26.png
    If Gutman isn't back to full speed, he probably takes his spot...
    if Gutman is going to play back into form, we will probably see more 4-2-3-1
     
    goldclover and bunge repped this.
  19. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    I think they’re fully committed to the playoffs and I commend them for that. They gave up creativity for speed. Frank rotated through a bunch of formations and players in new positions and I can only assume he has picked the favored path forward and wing speed gives us a better chance than methodical passing.

    I’m not a big fan of the “play the kids” mantra. The coaches see these kids every day. They know what they have and the kids would be on the first team if they were ready. That’s always my thought, anyway.
     
    goldclover, xtomx and overlap_old_coach repped this.
  20. Pennsylvania Dave

    Jul 31, 2012
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Well that would make sense if Glasgow was slow. He's pretty dang fast is all I'm saying. The recent highlights of the Fire II match he got WAY behind the back line. Will that work at the next level? Maybe not but I'd like to see him try.
     
    schroncar, goldclover and bunge repped this.
  21. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    For better or worse, Lassiter is a known commodity. Glasgow is potential. I can’t argue with a coach trying to salvage a season.
     
  22. schroncar

    schroncar Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Mar 2, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #3172 schroncar, Aug 14, 2024
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2024
    I share some of your concerns/thoughts. My best guess is that they are still nursing some faint hope of the playoffs. He was announced as a backup LWB. He is only signed for 9 or 10 matches. It is possible they believe this need would be better accomplished by Lassiter than Glasgow.
    They probably have reached a conclusion regarding Glasgow by now. Of course, the Lassiter move may mean negotiations with Glasgow are stalled. Keeping my fingers crossed!
     
  23. overlap_old_coach

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    May 2, 2022
    100%, but I am (a little) surprised Frank was not allowed to "spend more" for help...
     
  24. schroncar

    schroncar Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Mar 2, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    True. Do you think Frank made this decision?
    Only thing, Glasgow may already be better than Lassiter.
    Plus, most common way for young players to get better is for them to be challenged and to play at the next level up.
     
    Pennsylvania Dave repped this.
  25. overlap_old_coach

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    May 2, 2022
    #3175 overlap_old_coach, Aug 15, 2024
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2024
    I absolutely think Frank had a say.
    But he also was not allowed to ask for a 'more significant signing'...they need the flexibility to attract the next manager.
    Otherwise we would have signed a Memphis, or a Willian, or, etc for a 24/25+1option.

    And FWIW, I 'like' Glasgow, but he's not much more exciting than Espinoza was...fast, got some good instincts, but not mature or even reliable. He's in development and Lassiter seems more like Raheem Edwards.

    Stats-wize, he should bring some excitement to the attack...looks much better on paper than Raheem or Omari
    upload_2024-8-14_23-26-11.png
     
    goldclover repped this.

Share This Page