News on Nov 14 Friendly?

Discussion in 'USA Men' started by johnsemlak, Oct 22, 2009.

  1. johnsemlak

    johnsemlak Member

    Jun 27, 2009
    New York
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Discussion of this seems to have died. Is there any word on who might or will be the opponent and the location? Grr I want to look up flights.
     
  2. JediMindTricks

    Jun 20, 2006
    Houston
    aren't we playing norway?
     
  3. JediMindTricks

    Jun 20, 2006
    Houston
  4. bshredder

    bshredder BigSoccer Supporter

    Feb 23, 1999
    Club:
    Millwall FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Given that we've already played Italy and Spain this year.. while a bunch of other countries are busy, I've got no complaints.
     
  5. Master O

    Master O Member+

    Jul 7, 2006
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    How strong are the Slovaks? I know very little about them.
     
  6. TFC17

    TFC17 Member

    Mar 20, 2009
    Slovakia is a solid European side, they won their qualifying group. Technically sound, should be a good test for you guys.
     
  7. ChelseaMatt

    ChelseaMatt Member

    Apr 12, 2005
    Memphis
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm ecstatic. Kudo's to Sunil for once.
     
  8. TheLostUniversity

    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Feb 4, 2007
    Greater Boston
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Denmark and Slovakia, two solid teams that won their qualifying groups outright--and, importantly, will confront us with two strongly differing styles. This should provide some new insight as to what work lies ahead for the WC. These are the sort of friendlies we badly needed prior to WC 2006 [and in general did not get]
     
  9. DragonFly

    DragonFly New Member

    Dec 31, 1999
    Slovakia, a less than dominant 4-4-1 team at home during WC qualification, including a near-fatal 0-2 home loss to Slovenia in the 2nd to last game, needed a Poland own goal for the 0-1 away win in the last game of qualification to win their group.

    I'm sure they're solid, and away games in Europe will always be good tests. But I also wish we had secured Croatia (#8), Czech (#15), or Serbia (#20), all of whom had no games scheduled yet, rather than #33 FIFA ranked Slovakia.
     
  10. TCNJFan

    TCNJFan New Member

    Nov 12, 2006
    Fairborn, OH
    This is a fine matchup. Slovakia won their group and we have played (or will play) most of the other group winners: Denmark, Switzerland (2007), Germany (2006), Spain (2008, 2009), England (2008), Italy (2006, 2009), Netherlands (FIFA.com says March 2010). Serbia is the exception.
     
  11. ASU55RR

    ASU55RR Member+

    Jul 31, 2004
    Brooklyn, NY/Brno,CZ
    Club:
    FC Zbrojovka Brno
    Nat'l Team:
    Czechia
    now that would have been an interesting friendly for you guys, especially in Beograd... would make Azteca seem like a library.

    As for Slovakia... well they beat us (Czech Republic), though that is rather easy these days. A strong but inconsistant squad, great set of midfielders with Hamsik and Sestak.
     
  12. FW__

    FW__ Member+

    Jun 23, 2006
    Chattanooga, TN
    Club:
    Manchester City FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd rather play a side who actually qualified for the WC, not just look at FIFA rankings.
     
  13. DragonFly

    DragonFly New Member

    Dec 31, 1999
    Cool, you want to play North Korea and Bahrain/New Zealand too?

    Tell me, how many times did you see Slovakia play over the course of qualification? I saw them 2 times at the end, and they were crap in both games.

    Sometimes it's about current form and not how many points they garnered earlier on. Ya know, cause we're actually playing them in less than a month.
     
  14. johnsemlak

    johnsemlak Member

    Jun 27, 2009
    New York
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Slovakia is a team we could actually play in the WC so I don't see it as a bad match at all.

    Do we know the venue? Is it definitely Bratislava?
     
  15. withoutthee88

    withoutthee88 Red Card

    Aug 23, 2008
    Chicago/USA
    So Slovakia and Denmark... two UEFA qualifying group winners. I'll take it.
     
  16. DragonFly

    DragonFly New Member

    Dec 31, 1999
    The location was not yet announced, or at least is not mentioned in this article (in Slovak), nor is it listed (game nor location) on the FIFA fixture list.
     
  17. TCNJFan

    TCNJFan New Member

    Nov 12, 2006
    Fairborn, OH
    Considering who was available, this wasn't a terrible choice. Ironically, Serbia will play South Korea on the 18th in London, so they may have been available for the 14th in western Europe. Every other qualified team is either occupied (Paraguay is "free", but plays Chile on the 4th and the Netherlands on the 18th), a team we've played at some point since 2006, or ranked outside of FIFA's top 45 (North/South Korea).
     
  18. arkjayback

    arkjayback Member

    Mar 29, 2008
    Le Mars, IA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Two road games against teams that won their UEFA qualifying groups.

    Considering other top European teams already have scheduled games or are playing in World Cup playoffs, what else do you want? Seriously, why do people have to gripe about everything?
     
  19. DragonFly

    DragonFly New Member

    Dec 31, 1999
    Perhaps you'd read my post where I said the 3 teams who were open on 11/14 that I'd rather see the US play. I guess reading comprehension's not your strong suite.

    Assuming we play a home send-off series in May against semi-weak competition (hello Latvia, Venezuela & Morocco) and camp cupcake games in Jan-Feb, we only had 3 FIFA intl dates to schedule tough games.

    I'm extremely happy over the Denmark and Holland away games. Brilliant. Amazing. Huge kudos to USSF. More than I ever expected.

    But to say I can't question the 3rd game against a team who sucked hard in their last 2 games is foolish. As I said, I'm sure this game will be tough, as most away games in Europe are difficult. I just would've rather seen Serbia, Croatia or the Czechs. It's an opinion, live with it.
     
  20. hairynippleman

    Jun 13, 2007
    slovakia actually qualified... croatia and czech didn't. let's go with the team that gets it done.
     
  21. hairynippleman

    Jun 13, 2007
    how good as croatia and czech looked then... if they didn't even qualify??
     
  22. DragonFly

    DragonFly New Member

    Dec 31, 1999
    Croatia looked good - they were in a brutal group with England and Ukraine, and unfortunately couldn't get through with 20 points. That would've been a fun game to see.

    Czech's looked very solid once they switched coaches mid qualifying. They were effectively out by the last game, and didn't try in their N. Ireland game. (I also wouldn't mind revenge over the '06 debacle in Germany).

    Look, Slovakia has good, solid players - some stars, some not. But let's hope their negative playing in the last games was an outlier and not typical of how they'll play the US.
     
  23. hairynippleman

    Jun 13, 2007
    the mighty ukraine!
     
  24. ryebreadraz

    ryebreadraz Member

    Apr 18, 2007
    Los Angeles
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The problem with playing teams that didn't qualify for the WC is that you have no guarantee they'll play their A squad. It's all too possible that they begin working on younger players as they want to get a look at guys who haven't been in the squad. Too much of an unknown playing non-WC qualified teams.
     

Share This Page