Pre-match: New Fire Stadium-Yep, It's happening!

Discussion in 'Chicago Fire' started by xtomx, Jun 3, 2025.

?

What are your feelings about the new stadium?

  1. Psyched!

    17 vote(s)
    58.6%
  2. Super Psyched!

    10 vote(s)
    34.5%
  3. I am over the f*cking Moon!

    12 vote(s)
    41.4%
  4. Boo! I wanted to stay to Soldier Field, I will miss the Football lines

    1 vote(s)
    3.4%
  5. Boo! I wanted to return to Bridgeview. It was our home

    4 vote(s)
    13.8%
  6. Boo! I TOTALLY thought the Lincoln Yards site was going to happen

    2 vote(s)
    6.9%
  7. Joe is coming through, once again!

    13 vote(s)
    44.8%
  8. I am beyond thrilled that it will be privately funded.

    16 vote(s)
    55.2%
  9. "Privately Funded? This sets a bad precedent!"- White Sox and Bears

    8 vote(s)
    27.6%
  10. Something STUPID will happen!

    10 vote(s)
    34.5%
  11. Can we sell the naming rights to Malört? That would be awesome!

    13 vote(s)
    44.8%
  12. Harold's Chicken Shack Stadium

    9 vote(s)
    31.0%
  13. Marshall Field's Field! (or Marshall's Field?)

    4 vote(s)
    13.8%
  14. MorningStar Horizon (well, it sounds nice and worked for Rosemont for a time)

    4 vote(s)
    13.8%
  15. It will be some silly corporate name (Stub Hub, Seat Geek, "Lower.com") nonsense

    4 vote(s)
    13.8%
  16. Solder Field (just to f*ck with people, but named after Lost Soldier Oil and Gas from Wyoming)

    1 vote(s)
    3.4%
  17. No, Raccoon Arena! (Yes, we can call an outdoor place an Arena)

    9 vote(s)
    31.0%
  18. It will open PRIOR to the new stadium for NYCFC (we are the City that Works, afterall!)

    9 vote(s)
    31.0%
  19. What, No Dome?!? Fail

    5 vote(s)
    17.2%
  20. Shaqiri sucks! He didn't run enough!

    8 vote(s)
    27.6%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. milicz

    milicz Member+

    Dec 2, 2001
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    Poland
    I remember reading local residents killed the L stop?
     
  2. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    Correct. NIMBYs.

    My understanding is that people are trying to route the dollars for the train station to an extension of the river walk. I have not seen confirmation of this.
     
  3. Mac97

    Mac97 Member+

    Jul 15, 2014
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    The Fire House is starting to take shape above ground:

    upload_2026-7-13_17-57-2.jpeg
     
    harrylee773 and bunge repped this.
  4. Mikebsiu

    Mikebsiu Member+

    Mar 15, 2008
    Club:
    RSC Anderlecht
    So it sounds like there won’t be too much parking due to limited space, and some may be under ground. Honest question, will we still be able to tailgate, or are they phasing that out?
     
  5. bunge

    bunge BigSoccer Supporter

    Oct 24, 2000
    It doesn’t look good…
     
  6. overlap_old_coach

    Chicago Fire
    United States
    May 2, 2022
    My guess is it will be 'Wrigley-like'...meaning vendors will allow groups but not BYOB.
     
    willydonc repped this.
  7. Fuegofan repped this.
  8. harrylee773

    harrylee773 Member+

    Palermo
    Jul 28, 2004
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    “Offering train-like reliability”
    Just build us trains. I don’t want “train-like reliability” -and capacity-, I want the availability and capacity of trains.
    I’ll take this, of course, it is literally better than nothing, but I do wonder if this is just being considered as an alternative to the additional train station that appears to have been 86’d instead of a companion.
     
    willydonc and bunge repped this.
  9. schroncar

    schroncar Member+

    Chicago Fire
    Mar 2, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Train projects are much more expensive, take much longer to complete,
    generate more initial opposition and operate at much larger deficits.
    Other than that….
     
    willydonc and harrylee773 repped this.
  10. harrylee773

    harrylee773 Member+

    Palermo
    Jul 28, 2004
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, I mean, things that are better cost more than the alternatives, initially and long term, I just prefer things that are better. With NITA in place, I would like to think we’d be a little more ambitious, and maybe we’ll end up being more ambitious (def too early to tell) but anytime I see a BRT project touted as being “train-like” I see it as a concession. And it’s a concession I’ll gladly make, given that the realistic alternative is going to be “jack shit”, but not one I can pretend to be excited about.
     
    willydonc and schroncar repped this.

Share This Page