Naperville approves Fire for 2003

Discussion in 'Chicago Fire' started by alf, Sep 17, 2002.

  1. alf

    alf Member+

    Jun 29, 1999
    Illinois
    Club:
    Chicago Red Stars
    Naperville board approves.
     
  2. What changes did they approve? Are we going to get fireworks next year? This would make us a little closer to the real Fire and Soldier Field.
     
  3. mactheknife

    mactheknife New Member

    Aug 2, 2002
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    oh, man...i really hope they approved fireworks...i'm still yet to experience SF-scale madness.
     
  4. alf

    alf Member+

    Jun 29, 1999
    Illinois
    Club:
    Chicago Red Stars
    I am not aware of any changes that were made. I strictly know that is was approved.
     
  5. prk166

    prk166 BigSoccer Supporter

    Aug 8, 2000
    Med City
    Just remember, it could be worse. :)
     
  6. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    Well if anything, hope they lifted the night game limit as well as the cap on total matches.
     
  7. JPChicago

    JPChicago New Member

    Jun 25, 2002
    Umm, let's see...picture the same or smaller crowd size that you've seen in NPRVL,add alcohol and stir, in a large, oversized, cavernous bowl. Sprinkle with fireworks.
    For all the complaints about NPRVL ( and boy do I complain) when we get back to SF it's going to feel awfully empty and quiet.
     
  8. BillQ

    BillQ New Member

    Oct 11, 1999
    Chicago, IL
    Re: Re: Naperville approves Fire for 2003

    Naperville has agreed to let the Fire try the Fireworks in a demonstration to see if they have any negative effect on the people who live near Cardinal. Once the city council gets feedback they will give the final thurmbs up or down on the issue.
     
  9. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    I don't know...I guess I never really felt lost in Soldier Field. Yeah, it was big, but from where I sat never 'cavernous'.

    I don't think the new place will be that way either...probably less so.
     
  10. gofire2001

    gofire2001 New Member

    Apr 5, 2001
    Section 8 Chicago
    I want beer, smoke bombs, flares, swearing, and real grass but otherwise I'm happy with the deal.
     
  11. heybeerman

    heybeerman Member

    Aug 2, 2001
    Chicago Burbs
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    I was told there would only be a couple of day games next year... Heat was my #1 complaint.
     
  12. genpabloescobar

    Feb 17, 2002
    I'd trade all of those for seasons like in the past, where we weren't sweating our playoff lives on the last day of the season.
     
  13. gofire2001

    gofire2001 New Member

    Apr 5, 2001
    Section 8 Chicago
    good point
     
  14. skinut

    skinut Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 25, 2000
    Castle Pines, CO (or often elsewhere on earth)
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    As usual, what he said.

    Additionally, Solder Field held noise very well. I also agree that I rarely felt like I was in an empty bowl there. For a large venue it was actually failry intimate.

    Oh year -- the crowds we averaged there were LARGER. We averaged 16,400 last season. Cardinal holds 15,900.
     
  15. alf

    alf Member+

    Jun 29, 1999
    Illinois
    Club:
    Chicago Red Stars
  16. Glenwood Lane United

    Apr 28, 2001
    Hanover Park, IL
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Interesting how they already have a tentative date for the 2003 home opener.
     
  17. csh2000

    csh2000 New Member

    Nov 2, 2000
    Chicago
    I made it to one game this year and it wasn't a good enough experience to convince me to go back. I'm fine waiting for them to be a Chicago team again, it's just a shame they couldn't find something that works that somewhat resembles "convenient" to their original fan-base.
     
  18. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
  19. Iceblink

    Iceblink Member

    Oct 11, 1999
    Chicago
    Club:
    Ipswich Town FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Typical. I am very much a part of the Fire's "original" fanbase. Whether I like NCC and Cardinal Stadium or not, I find it convenient as hell... more convenient than it ever has been.

    SF was and will be inconvenient as hell for me... expensive too.

    So I'll call your "original" fan and raise you a "devoted" fan who went to SF and will again... inconvenient or not.
     
  20. gofire2001

    gofire2001 New Member

    Apr 5, 2001
    Section 8 Chicago
    And don't expect it to become any cheaper in two years.
     
  21. Jeremy Goodwin

    Jeremy Goodwin Member+

    SSC Napoli
    Feb 16, 1999
    Club:
    Montreal Impact
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Updated link:

    http://www.dailyherald.com/search/main_story.asp?intID=3751761

    April 26. That's a long time. Oh well.

    As to that first paragraph...are there any huge tracts of undeveloped land in Naperville?
     
  22. redzin

    redzin New Member

    Jan 6, 2000
    I'll echo these comments. I've been a season ticket holder from the beginning. I live in the western burbs so Cardinal Stadium is a total breeze.

    Some of the suburban families at the games annoy me, but that's just me. Some of the people used to annoy me at Soldier Field too.

    If Cardinal Stadium had a regulation size field with real grass it would be a model for all of MLS.
     
  23. Glenwood Lane United

    Apr 28, 2001
    Hanover Park, IL
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd add maybe 5,000-10,000 seats, more parking, and a tailgate area, but other than that, I agree.
     
  24. jdm2662

    jdm2662 New Member

    Aug 6, 2002
    Hillside, IL
     
  25. BerwynBlazers

    BerwynBlazers Member

    Jul 23, 2001
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    beer..
     

Share This Page