Moderator of Australia ( el-capitano )forum is a troll in his forums

No, more of a query as to what sort of medication you were on

 

Again, because he was joking.

I can see where the confusion is coming from now, you just don't get it. You've shown on this thread that your understanding of humour is as developed as a retarded amoeba.

I'll leave you to it, I was told at a young age never to mock the afflicted so.....

 

Why were you in AUSTRALIA forum in a first place?

The majority of the problams in BIGsoccer start because people go to OTHER'S forum and see the something that makes them ANGRY. They say a something BAD to reply and then the FIGHT starts.

You should BEHAVE with a RESPECT in AUSTRALIA forum. You are the GUEST. In American people say bad things about JAPANESE, but what can I say? This is THEIR country! I do not cry in POLICE of the bad things!

Only reasin you go to AUSTRALIA forum is to make the FIGHT. You are not the AUSTRALIA fan and when I see all of your posts, you NEVER say good of AUSSIES. Then why do you go to AUSTRALIA forum? Trouble making that is why!

Everyone needs STAY in OWN FORUM.

 

He's not a troll, he didn't lie and yes you're a joke

 

So who's the troll now? Sinner or el-capitano?

 

Actually, my guess is that the reason he didn't warn Sinner is because of an inferiority complex of some kind. I don't know too much about it though.

So Homo (I sure hope this isn't the real Hama, because the natural course is to start calling this new username Homo....hmmm) this is the Japan forum right? Nice.

I like these smilies.

 

Right, back to basics

Why is el-capitano a troll? You went onto the Aussie forum and made a provocative comment. El-capitano told you to piss off back to your own forum using a funny comment, not an accusation - a JOKE.

Ok, you had three choices here;

1) Ignore it and accept he had every right to tell you to get lost as you were trolling the Aussie forum and could have infracted you for this alone (the sane choice)

2) If you're so thin-skinned to take offence you could have PMed him and explained your grievance and come to an agreement as adults

3) Throw your toys out of the pram and stalk him onto a completely separate thread further exacerbating your earlier trolling (the numpty choice)

Yup, you went straight to numpty town.

Maybe you should switch to french knickers, I'd imagine they get up your arse less

I look forward to your next post of further childish whinging, somehow I know you wont disappoint

 

By the way, any particular reason you continue to deliberately mis-quote el-capitano? Leaving off the smiley doesn't help your case much so why do it?

 

ROTFLMAO - I'm getting owned here?

I've already answered this several times but this time I'll type slowly and use mono-syllabic words as much as possible so you can keep up

You don't find it a joke as anything more advanced than Benny Hill is past you. He even idiot-proofed it for you by inserting the smiley but I guess even that was beyond you.

As you're in the mood to accuse someone of not answering questions how about you give us a laugh and explain why el-capitano is a troll?

 

No, it means it's a joke. For fecks sake he gave you enough clues

 

Sigh - for it to be a joke it needs to be funny. You're not very good at this are you?

Strange, still no answer to the question of why el-capitano is a troll. I'm sure you'll come back with an equally "hilarious" post to explain that too

 

Every now and again, Customer Service does throw up one of these truely great threads.

*Rolls up sofa, bags of popcorn and a few sixpacks.*

Whoo-hoo!

(Mr. Sandwich, sir, you do realise that what you're trying to do will be as effective as converting a Bianchi Road bike to Islam?)

 

I'm halfway through my second six-pack already.

 

Looking at it objectively, even if you include the "defending an 8-0 loss" comment/joke (which this whole trolling argument seems to be based on) I don't see how someone who has been trolling on someone else's board can come into customer service and accuse the moderator of that board (who, if he was a troll, would surely have never got in that position in the first place) of trolling because he retaliated to a trolling comment made by said poster. That is what I don't understand about this whole thing.

If you think about it, if you had never gone into that forum deliberately looking to wind up the posters in there, he would never have made this comment back to you, and this thread would be null and void. True?

 

Do my eyes fail me, or did you seriously start a thread snowballing into this discussion..?