MLS Players Union Recognized

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by kenntomasch, Apr 17, 2003.

  1. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    MLS NEWS RELEASE

    For Immediate Release Contact: MLS
    Communications
    www.MLSnet.com
    (212) 450-1225

    MLS RECOGNIZES NEW PLAYERS UNION

    NEW YORK (Thursday, April 17, 2003) - The Major League Soccer Players Union (MLSPU) has been designated by the MLS players to serve as their exclusive bargaining representative. Following this designation, the MLSPU sent the League a request for recognition. In accordance with the National Labor Relations Act, Major League Soccer has recognized the MLSPU. The League anticipates that the collective bargaining process will begin in the near future.

    "MLS looks forward to developing a productive relationship with its players through collective bargaining," said MLS Commissioner Don Garber. "As we have stated since the League's inception, we want to partner with the players to continue developing professional soccer in the United States."

    Major League Soccer's eighth season continues with four games on Saturday. The defending Eastern Conference champion New England Revolution host the Columbus Crew at Gillette Stadium in the latest installment of 2003 MLS Soccer Saturday beginning at 4:00 p.m. ET on ESPN2.

    Other action this weekend includes the Chicago Fire at D.C. United from RFK Stadium at 7:30 p.m. ET in Fox Sports World's second MLS Game of the Week, while the MetroStars host the MLS Cup holders Los Angeles Galaxy, also at 7:30 p.m. ET from Giants Stadium. Week three of the 2003 season concludes with HDNet's presentation of the Kansas City Wizards at Spartan Stadium against the San Jose Earthquakes at 10:00 p.m. ET. The Colorado Rapids and Dallas Burn are idle this week.
     
  2. hangthadj

    hangthadj Member+

    A.S. Roma
    Mar 27, 2001
    Zone 14
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    It's about time that the players had a union.
     
  3. Jambon

    Jambon Member

    Mar 3, 2000
    Austin, TX
    I guess this officially ends the lawsuit. I hope the players don't have the same union representation as the WNBA.
     
  4. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, it's good that the players now have an official union and that MLS apparently is willing to deal with it.

    However, history shows us that the presence of a union almost always results in increased costs for management, and I'm not sure how well that's going to fly.
     
  5. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
  6. Woodrow

    Woodrow Member+

    Dec 7, 2001
    Brick City
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    It probably also means that the salary cap may increase more than the meager points it has increased up til now. One gets the sense that management has been waiting for a union to show up before giving any consideration to real wage increases.
     
  7. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I get the sense that they've been waiting for money to show up before giving any consideration to real wage increases.
     
  8. chayes

    chayes New Member

    Feb 29, 2000
    Raleigh, NC
    Well, here comes the collapse of our league.

    Enjoy this last year of MLS.
     
  9. Woodrow

    Woodrow Member+

    Dec 7, 2001
    Brick City
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    I'll rephrase. Altruism aside, MLS management has no incentive to give tangible raises to the players outside of a collective bargaining agreement, i.e. no union, no bargaining power.
     
  10. Northside Rovers

    Jan 28, 2000
    Austin TX
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This caught me by surprise.

    One can only hope that the players can see MLS finally picking up some monentum and that grandstanding and ultimatums are not going to help anyone.

    All you have to do is look at Southlake, Naperville, the 1/2 closed Gillette Stadium etc... to realize that MLS is still in critical condition.

    Is there a condition worse than critical?
     
  11. HO PHANTOM CDX

    HO PHANTOM CDX New Member

    Nov 13, 1999
    Lake Tapps WA
    A company that operates in the red and that is being sued by it's employees, is not a company that freely throws out money to the said employees.
     
  12. Jeremy Goodwin

    Jeremy Goodwin Member+

    SSC Napoli
    Feb 16, 1999
    Club:
    Montreal Impact
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not so much a bravo to the league, more a "dammit, what took you stupid people so long" to the players.

    As implied in MLS's statement, once the employees have nominated a representative (formed a union), the employer has an obligation to recognize and periodically negotiate with them under the FLSA.

    It's not like the league has an option in this.
     
  13. MD_05

    MD_05 New Member

    Oct 18, 2002
    Ohio
    should be a good thing, just whenever i think players union i think of the MLB strike, NBA holdout, and now the WNBA situation, hopefully we won't see that anytime soon
     
  14. kenntomasch

    kenntomasch Member+

    Sep 2, 1999
    Out West
    Club:
    FC Tampa Bay Rowdies
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Whatever.

    It's too bad they're not doing anything about the Southlake and Naperville situations.
     
  15. Goodsport

    Goodsport Moderator
    Staff Member

    May 18, 1999
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hopefully, SportsCenter, Jim Rome and the other soccer-haters won't diss the MLSPU acronym, as in "MLS? P.U.!" :eek:
     
  16. stanleyt

    stanleyt Member

    Dec 7, 1998
    Harlem, USA
    Yeah, it's officially listed as "Keith Richards."
     
  17. Ringo

    Ringo Member

    Jun 10, 2002
    Rough and Ready
    Club:
    Yeovil Town FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    exactly the thing I thought of. :(

    also, on MLSnet.com The Clean Sheet says that the executive board is: Chris Klein, Ben Olsen, Landon Donovan, Tim Howard and Alexi Lalas.


    Isn't Landon a little young and not-long-for-MLS to be on the board? evidently not.
     
  18. FlashMan

    FlashMan Member

    Jan 6, 2000
    'diego
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    also, he doesn't exactly strike me as a rebel given that MLS has bent over backwards to get him into the league. interesting.

    i would think agoos would be a good choice as an executive board member, but i guess not.
     
  19. Jeremy Goodwin

    Jeremy Goodwin Member+

    SSC Napoli
    Feb 16, 1999
    Club:
    Montreal Impact
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, what does that say about Ben Olsen?

    At this point, 'Lexi's about as grey bearded as they come for this league, with the exception of some of the foreign players who retired recently.
     
  20. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    I look forward to seeing who is on the player union's payroll.

    Hopefully we'll begin to see a bit of free agency. say players with five years of service who are out of contract.
     
  21. myshap

    myshap Member

    Jun 19, 2002
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    I sure hope the players enjoy having a good portion of their salaries taken so a guy who says he represents the Union can send his kids to Harvard.
     
  22. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  23. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Let's not turn this into a debate over union corruption. There are some very good reasons for unions, and some very bad reasons. unions have done amazing things for the health and quality of life of most workers in the US - and they have also shown the same propensity towards corruption and self-serving that all unchecked human endeavors seem to.

    I for one, think the player's union is a good thing.
     
  24. SJSoccerFan

    SJSoccerFan Member

    Feb 7, 2001
    This is correct, although it is actually the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) that provides the players with the unarguable right to organize. The FLSA addresses the payment of wages, e.g., overtime.

    I've always wondered why the players pursued the challenge to single entity rather than just forming a union and demanding collective bargaining. Probably a recognition that, even in a collective bargaining context, they seriously lack leverage given the dubious economic viability of professional soccer in this country and the fact that most of the players have not professional option other than playing in the US. Presumably they figured their best bet was to pit the owners (all three of them) against one another in order to increase competition for players. When that effort failed, the collective bargaining approach is the only remaining choice. I would guess they will try to bargain for some sort of limited free-agency and/or cap exemptions for veterans, providing them with a little more control over where they play (which, of course, some players already have. Witness Ernie Stewart.)
     
  25. Ringo

    Ringo Member

    Jun 10, 2002
    Rough and Ready
    Club:
    Yeovil Town FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    i know the WNBA player's union is on the verge of having their season cancelled. let's hope it never gets to that here.

    good luck to the players.
     

Share This Page