News: MLS owners approve fall-spring calendar and season format changes: Sources

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by JasonMa, Nov 12, 2025.

  1. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/68...ng-calendar-season-format-change-owners-vote/

    Felt like with this news this deserves its own thread.

    tl;dr versions for people who can't or don't want to read the article.

    • Schedule to play late-July/August to mid-December, restart in February either the week before or week after the Super Bowl, playoffs in May.
    • New format is single table with 5 divisions of 6 teams. Teams play their division opponents home and away (10 games) and every other team home or away (24 games). Division winners automatically qualify for the playoffs, other playoff teams based on the single-table.
     
    TrueCrew, oknazevad, Mike03 and 3 others repped this.
  2. FoxBoro 143

    FoxBoro 143 Member+

    Jan 18, 2004
    MA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Will the vote be on all three (calendar, table and playoffs) topics, or just the calendar moves with the other issues being a separate ongoing discussion?
     
  3. Quinn 33

    Quinn 33 Member+

    Apr 25, 2003
    Denver, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I sound like a broken record as I've said this in multiple other threads, but a winter switch would be complete disaster for my club without a serious change in how much ownership invests. 20 years of garbage ownership demonstrates that no such investment change will be coming. That leaves us with facilities completely inadequate to deal with the weather, attendance that will nosedive, and even greater irrelevance in the local spots landscape because they're competing with more teams.

    I don't think we're the only one with those problems either, but we're one of the worst off.

    Either the Rapids end up folding or they get sold off. Those are really the only two realistic outcomes.
     
  4. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Two votes tomorrow. One in the calendar, one on the structure. Playoff format TBD.
     
    Deadtigers, TrueCrew and FoxBoro 143 repped this.
  5. AZUL GALAXY

    AZUL GALAXY Member+

    Aug 28, 2009
    Los Angeles
    Club:
    CDSC Cruz Azul
    Teams that can play in winter, Portland, Seattle, Vancouver, San Jose, LAFC, LA Galaxy, San Diego, Miami, Orlando, Austin, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Nashville and teams that can play 2 or 3 games during winter in domed stadium, Minnesota, St. Louis, Montreal, the rest can schedule games but if the conditions aren’t right there’ll be rescheduled with a bigger gap for postponement, one of the benefits for MLS is that they can sell more winter gea
     
    Deadtigers and hipityhop repped this.
  6. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    "We're going to flip the schedule so our teams that have invested in dedicated custom built SSSs can...pay rent to play games in the local domed NFL stadium instead."

    W.T.F.
     
  7. AeroNaught

    AeroNaught Member+

    Atlanta United
    Feb 14, 2007
    Birmingham, AL
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    To touch on the division piece, not sure who you'd group in the "Southeast" and "Midwest" without losing a lot of rivalries...I assume they'd go DC for the Southeast and San Diego for Midwest?
     
  8. AZUL GALAXY

    AZUL GALAXY Member+

    Aug 28, 2009
    Los Angeles
    Club:
    CDSC Cruz Azul
    Is not flipping, is adding, during summer MLS teams can play leagues cup, preseason friendlies against Europe, Asia, Latin America teams to filled those dates
     
    soccer_23 repped this.
  9. FoxBoro 143

    FoxBoro 143 Member+

    Jan 18, 2004
    MA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm pretty sure that player contracts have a certain amount of time off for the off-season.
    I remember years back they pushed up the start of the regular season and the MLS Cup teams started training 2 or 3 days later than everyone else because of the required break.
     
    HailtotheKing and JasonMa repped this.
  10. WarrenWallace

    WarrenWallace Member+

    Mar 12, 1999
    Beer and Cheese
    Everyone is being a bit dramatic and I get it as this is one of their passions. Anticipating this move I had already canceled the auto renewal for AppleTV MLS. I watch MLS from after the NCAA Final Foul (first weekend in April) until the start of the College Football season (Labor Day weekend). This is like a 4-5 month stretch. I feel like I'm being forced out as a fan. But its life.
     
    TheJoeGreene repped this.
  11. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    During the summer the players can have the CBA mandated break (which any player actually needs to play at full effectiveness), so no, we aren't adding anything.
     
    HailtotheKing, Mike03 and superdave repped this.
  12. ArsenalMetro

    ArsenalMetro Member+

    United States
    Aug 5, 2008
    Chicago, IL
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    "The plan is to move the league to a single-table format, but that also includes five divisions..."

    Who wants to tell these people that they don't know what a single-table is? Like, by this logic, the American League is a single-table format.
     
  13. Papin

    Papin BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 19, 1998
    le côté obscur
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The playoffs last year ran through November and culminated in MLS Cup on December 7th, one week shy of when a Fall-Summer schedule would start its winter break. Your Rapids played their first official match at Dick's on February 18th, a week or two later than when the suggested Fall-Summer schedule would resume regular league play. Does that extra week in December and that extra week or two in February spell doom for the Rapids? The new schedule is actually not all that drastically different from the current schedule -- just maybe swapping some sweltering July games for colder Dec and Feb games.
     
    CeltTexan, STR1, soccer_23 and 2 others repped this.
  14. AZUL GALAXY

    AZUL GALAXY Member+

    Aug 28, 2009
    Los Angeles
    Club:
    CDSC Cruz Azul
    If USL super league can do it, why MLS couldn’t do it ?
     
  15. FoxBoro 143

    FoxBoro 143 Member+

    Jan 18, 2004
    MA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Wouldn't you prefer to have the late season stretch and playoffs fall into your window, rather than boring regular season games that don't matter to you because you don't watch the stretch or the playoffs
     
    soccer_23 and jaykoz3 repped this.
  16. crew2112

    crew2112 Member+

    Jan 25, 2008
    Dayton, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    These changes will make MLS a fully proper league. What’s not to like?
     
    AZUL GALAXY repped this.
  17. ArsenalMetro

    ArsenalMetro Member+

    United States
    Aug 5, 2008
    Chicago, IL
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    I cancelled Fire season tickets because too many games were already happening when the weather sucks in the early part of the season because Leagues Cup gutted the summer schedule (and the later games were all moving to Bridgeview). The calendar change just means that there will be like...5 home games all season in Chicago where it's actually nice out.
     
    Shabs, RafaLarios, HailtotheKing and 8 others repped this.
  18. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Considering the Rapids have nowhere to train those extra weeks on either side, the stadium isn't fully operational because its not winterized for those games, and the Rapids have played in 3 of the 4 coldest games in MLS history when starting in February due to CCC play, all in front of 4 digit numbers of fans (starting with a 1 as the first of the 4 digits), yes, it is likely to have a significant negative effect on the ability of the club to complete and survive.

    Any other questions you want to ask?
     
  19. Quinn 33

    Quinn 33 Member+

    Apr 25, 2003
    Denver, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #19 Quinn 33, Nov 12, 2025
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2025
    It was 6 degrees fahrenheit at kickoff and less than 2,000 people attended that game. Literally no one looks at a match day like that and says "More of this, please!"

    Let's play devils advocate and say that it was an MLS game instead of CCC, and its a Saturday fixture instead of Tuesday, you're still getting fewer than 10k showing up. Possibly a lot fewer.

    Yeah, I think it does. Attendance will materially drop because you just gave everyone another reason to not go to games. You also remove the one annual fixture that has consistently been a sellout (July 4) with no replacement. Only the hardcore fans will still show up, and thats just diminishing returns since ownership does nothing to cultivate that segment because they provide such a consistently terrible product. They need those more casual fans to stay afloat.

    Also, where does the team train? Our facilities are already poor by MLS standards, and they are even worse if cold/snowy weather becomes a more consistent part of the equation. They'd have to spend money either building facilities, or renting out space somewhere else.

    Costs go up. Revenue goes down. The owner is already a cheapskate. He's not going to look at a situation like this and want to spend more money. It'll be the opposite.

    The outcome is our team either folds or is relocated. The only way they'd survive and stay in Colorado is if some angel investor buys the club (from an owner that typically doesn't sell their stuff).

    If its not that different, why change it?
     
  20. JasonMa

    JasonMa Member+

    Mar 20, 2000
    Arvada, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm not quite as negative as Quinn, I think KSE will be happy to continue operating the Rapids at the minimum spend the other owners will allow him to get away with for a long time, but its going to be a dead market in all other aspects unless MLS is going to provide the investment themselves.
     
    superdave repped this.
  21. TheRealBilbo

    TheRealBilbo Member+

    Apr 5, 2016
    They’ll become an Arsenal farm team.
     
  22. ArsenalMetro

    ArsenalMetro Member+

    United States
    Aug 5, 2008
    Chicago, IL
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    #22 ArsenalMetro, Nov 12, 2025
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2025
    The schedule change also exacerbates an issue that I've had with MLS forever, which is that the teams don't play for long enough.

    The big Euro leagues run for 9 months, from August to May with 3 months off. This calendar also has that length overall, but with playoffs taking up all of May and with December and January completely off, you're looking at a league where a big chunk of teams only play for 7 months a year (currently about 8). That's not ideal for player development, and also sets players back who are set to play internationally in the summer because they'll have up to 2 full months off before summer tournaments kick off in earnest.

    So you'll have the problem that a lot of CWC players did this summer, where they need to ramp down from the season, ramp up for the tournament season, ramp down, then ramp up again for the next league campaign. You're asking for injuries with that.

    With this schedule, the playoffs need to be very short. Like, start May 15 and end May 31 sort of short.
     
    JG, mbar and JasonMa repped this.
  23. AZUL GALAXY

    AZUL GALAXY Member+

    Aug 28, 2009
    Los Angeles
    Club:
    CDSC Cruz Azul
    Also what I noticed about Chicago in this season was, why they scheduled 2 games in March but they scheduled 4 consecutive away games in late May and early June, why not flipping those?
     
  24. Papin

    Papin BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 19, 1998
    le côté obscur
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Maybe you should look into why GMs have been asking for the change.
     
    soccer_23 repped this.
  25. Quinn 33

    Quinn 33 Member+

    Apr 25, 2003
    Denver, CO
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So basically we turn into a modern equivalent of an bottom dwelling team from the old NASL. The ones that would draw 4k or 5k on average and then fold after a year or two...except we'd be kept alive because Single Entity™.

    What is good for LA and Miami isn't necessarily good for Colorado. Also, our GM is a certified glue-eater, so his opinion on anything can be safely discarded.
     
    Mountainia and JasonMa repped this.

Share This Page