Missing Iraqi Explosives: The who, how and why? Thread

I was wrong. That's 0.00095 of a per cent of the known total.

 

NASA called, and they said to say that the point is now in geosynchrous orbit above your head.

 

Are you really that thick? Wait a second, I guess you are, since you have a red nipple and a yellow card. No surprise.

 

1. Since your posting history here and elsewhere around bigsoccer is one of a person who has an adversarial relationship with the truth, I gotta ask...is it .01% of explosives? Or weapons?
2. These explosives are a lil' different from your average stuff. I'd explain it to you so you could be educated on the issue, but i know you don't want to be educated.

 

I quoted from the link provided by one of your lefty pals.

 

Re: 380 TONS of Explosives Missing in Iraq? Thread

This argument is so freaking bad, I can't believe you stand behind it. Your point seems to be.
1. We know that Bushco defrauded Congress and the American public on WMDs.
2. Congress should not have fallen for the fraud.
3. It's John Kerry's fault for being defrauded by Bushco.

Apparently, even if you buy your false dichotomy, you think it better to have a President willing to defraud America than a President capable of being defrauded. You probably blame Enron shareholders and think their CFO is just mighty clever, too. -

 

Ooo.... I wanna play! I'm not reading the other posts either.

Let's see....


Who? Them!

How? Too damned easily!

Why? To blow up Americans!

Do I get a cookie?

 

No, it's .00095, which equals .095 of a percent.