McBride and MLS vs EPL-EVERTON

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by co-reff, Mar 23, 2003.

  1. co-reff

    co-reff New Member

    Mar 18, 2003
    Colorado
    Anyone else believe that McBride is getting the short end as the MLS doesnt extend his loan to Everton?

    How far does the tradeoff go between player and business? Doesn't this further limit the MLS's potential for growth to eventually compete with the better world leagues?
     
  2. MLS3

    MLS3 Member

    Feb 7, 2000
    Pac NW
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    McBride wanted to stay in the US!!!!!!!!

    Figure it out...
     
  3. Cweedchop

    Cweedchop Member+

    Mar 6, 2000
    Ellicott City, Md
    It's not the MLS, it's simply MLS..
     
  4. Dr. Wankler

    Dr. Wankler Member+

    May 2, 2001
    The Electric City
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    1) No. It was his choice. 2) N/A. Unless your name is Brian McBride and you've played for Columbus, Everton, and the US National team this past year, in which case you might have something to say of note. 3) No. The current market for transfers is depressed, so you can't really judge this year's movements and asking prices by years past. So, just because none of our guys made a big-money leap to a more lucrative league is no reason to doubt the viability of MLS. In fact, having our World Cup stars stay in the league might do more to help it grow than sending them off to Europe.
     
  5. puttputtfc

    puttputtfc Member+

    Sep 7, 1999
    Considering McBride's performance tonight, I would say he is happy to be back home.
     
  6. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Re: Re: McBride and MLS vs EPL-EVERTON

    Indeed.

    It's not "the Soccer".
     
  7. FairWeatherFan

    Sep 9, 2002
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    After the World Cup, there was considerable interest in a number of the US's players. McBride, DeMarcus Beasley and Landon Donovan were all involved in talks of some sort about going overseas to play.
    While this may be a compliment to the young talent that we are raising in the US, it won't do anything to further the popularity of MLS if we make a policy of sending our brightest stars out of the league.
     
  8. gabe

    gabe New Member

    Oct 17, 2002
    NJ
    McBride made a great choice about staying here frankly.. the World hopefully will come to its senses and pay attention to a league that developed players capable of beating Portugal and Mexico
     
  9. GoDC

    GoDC Member

    Nov 23, 1999
    Hamilton, VA
    EPL is not as good as the Concacaf Champions Cup since McBride could not score when he got back ehre.
     
  10. Isisbud

    Isisbud New Member

    Mar 10, 2003
    Encinitas
    Popularity vs. Quality of the American Player. Which is more important? I think the latter, because if you raise the quality, you'll attract people who like to watch good soccer, and are probably already soccer fans, just not MLS fans yet. The quality of the players are raised because they are playing against the best in the world day in day out, AND freeing up spots in MLS for young talent. In 2-6 years time, when players are looking to "coome home," you'll still have those players cooming home as wise-old AMERICAN veterans, ala Ernie Stewart. So, put more players in Europe, when their career is winding down, they will be more likely to put in hard work for the remaining few years they spend in MLS--as opposed to some foreigners coming here to collect a check for a year before they are off to retirement. You would create a situation whereas AMERICANS would be the FOREIGN ALLOCATIONS and stars of MLS.

    If you just want to raise the soccer's popularity in the USA, keep those guys here. BUT, you will have fans that are less pasionate, and it stays labeled a little-kid sport forever that you "outgrow" when you are old enough to play gridiron football.
     

Share This Page