The ball is almost never placed on the endline. If the attacker decides to stand on the goalline and the defender push forward on the play the attacker can be caught offside. Of course it almost never happens. I'm just clearing up a misconception.
But YOU are the one wrong there. Read the effing Law 11: "No offence There is no offside offence if a player receives the ball directly from: • a goal kick • a throw-in • a corner kick" Because at the time a corner kick is taken, ALL players are even or behind the ball, so none of them can be in an office position. EDIT: I see you've acknowledged the mistake. Kudos.
So what? they can score even 10 goals, they have been outclassed in the first half and can thank referee not to have 0-2 as they came back in locker room...Mexico has to score 3 times in a row to score first.
The rules say you can't be offside after a corner kick (or throw-in or goal kick for that matter, basically every time the ball enters play after it was outside the field). You can only be offside if the ball is played again after the corner kick/throw-in/goal kick. Edit: I am too late here.
I feel that there's a conspiracy for neither team to win; whether it was because of what happened to Croatia where they want to give them a fair shot, or just make Brazil have a wider margin for no team to threaten it....
Tough call; would you call that a Yellow? I know he didn't make contact with the ball, but he just stood there.
Wow Mexico wasted a good chance with that bad touch. And glad the ref did not give a penalty to Cameroon.
Well, I was a little sceptical as to whether or not that ball crossed the line.....thanks to the goal technology graphic...I can now sleep soundly.
This is basically the game that both Cameroon or Mexico had to win to have any chance to go advance. A tie for both would basically be a disaster.