Match 9: CIV : ECU - LETEXIER (FRA)

Discussion in 'World Cup 2026 - Refereeing' started by MassachusettsRef, Jun 14, 2026.

  1. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
     
  2. BlueNosedRef

    BlueNosedRef Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    4' - I get the sense Letexier is in for a real test.
     
  3. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Kind of surprised he didn't book that, to be honest. But replay showed there was a lot less contact than intially appeared. That said, the intent was still there.
     
    BlueNosedRef repped this.
  4. BlueNosedRef

    BlueNosedRef Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    17' - I don't even have to say it.
     
  5. Tigerpunk

    Tigerpunk Member+

    Jun 17, 2004
    Almost a goal scored off of it too
     
  6. Tigerpunk

    Tigerpunk Member+

    Jun 17, 2004
    This game needs a card.
     
    BlueNosedRef repped this.
  7. BlueNosedRef

    BlueNosedRef Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    22' - Two negative consequences of the new Law on display. Letexier misses a genuine foul that causes a Ecuadorian to go down and he stops play for the injury; he has to go off for a minute. As the player is waiting, he gets so upset he charges down the touch line at Rahmouni during play!
     
  8. El Rayo Californiano

    Feb 3, 2014
    It did look like Ivory Coast held off on their attack until Ecuador was at full strength.
     
  9. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Letexier was hoping his AR would bail him out and give the foul, too, I think.
     
  10. BlueNosedRef

    BlueNosedRef Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    28' - Yeah that'll do for a YC.
     
    Tryamw and KCbus repped this.
  11. frankieboylampard

    Mar 7, 2016
    USA
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Spain
    22’ he calls the foul. Which was needed. But why not have the water break then? To echo @MassachusettsRef

    maybe 4th and team were occupied with coaches.
     
  12. Tigerpunk

    Tigerpunk Member+

    Jun 17, 2004
    I like how emphatic he was that that wasn't a foul, I just really hope he was right
     
  13. The Royal We

    The Royal We Member

    Aug 2, 2012
    There's three. Where is the bar for second caution going to be?
     
  14. BlueNosedRef

    BlueNosedRef Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    High. I think all of the YCs seen so far result in a warning for a player already booked.
     
  15. BlueNosedRef

    BlueNosedRef Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    79' - That was on nobody's bingo card.
     
  16. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    81' is a great decision to not give (or even seem to consider) a yellow card. Letexier is doing a good job at not overreacting to things that I think others would definitely overreact to.
     
    jarbitro and BlueNosedRef repped this.
  17. El Rayo Californiano

    Feb 3, 2014
    Congratulations to Letexier for producing a good show.
     
  18. ColoradoRef

    ColoradoRef Member

    Jul 10, 2011
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Exactly. He knew the player was already on a card and did not want anyone to think he was about to give a card only to bail out once he realized the player was already on a card, as we’ve seen too many times. The confidence and awareness it shows is top tier.
     
  19. jarbitro

    jarbitro Member+

    Mar 13, 2003
    N'Djamena, Tchad
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Ok, for me this was the top performance of the WC so far. He nailed it.
    However, did anyone else ( maybe @MassachusettsRef ) notice that he signaled a GK, players protested, he seemed to change to a corner, then AR held for the review. That is the first example I've seen of the R getting a GK wrong, then believing players, changing it so that VAR could confirm it.
     

Share This Page