This rule sucks. Do simulation cards ever get given outside of the penalty area when the referee sees it?
Not call the initial foul, and not give a yellow card when you make assumptions about the contact and don't actually see it!
I lost count of the number dives that were not carded in this tournament and now we get a game changer!!
The question, then, for y'all is if that was a good yellow rather than just a foul call on Paredes (assuming there had been contact). Because if there's no yellow, there's no mistaken identity review.
This is going to turn into a massive thing about the VAR review and subsequent caution as opposed to the true debacle, which was the on field initial decision
I wrote this yesterday Absolutely incredible and CORRECT decision. It’s absolutely unbelievable how people have complained for years about the endless diving in soccer. Now a player dives and cheats to get an opponent a yellow card, and because it caused him to get a second yellow, now people whine and complain about it. Thank God Collina had this added for the WC and I hope it gets added to the LOTG.
I mean this is much of what we've been discussing coming together at once, isn't it. An absolute horror show - combination of a new interpretation of a new-ish rule that had this One Weird Trick that nobody was thinking about, a tournament that's had an unspoken-but-clear ban on 2CTs that you can't avoid because of that rule, and a referee out of his depth and responding with aggression. (And separately the conspiracy theories.) Wow.
Is it really a yellow for a dive? It's a reversal of the yellow given to Paredes. Embolo would not have been carded for the dive in a standalone scenario.
This is the right call, but the problem is the consequence of a yellow is too harsh. Call me heretical, but soccer could learn something from ice hockey.