Fascinating that Arsenal were being made fun of losing in style in the Wenger era back when Mourinho and Benitez were serving prime battle ball, but now that the shirt has a different color it causes pain and suffering. People need to learn to just turn off the TV if they don't like it, and learn how to beat teams if they feel like they are not good. I think we got way too comfortable with the broadcasting and the luxury we have now.
You can say what you want about Arsenal’s playing style, but at least they’re well coached & have a clear vision. I can’t say the same about us right now. We are by for one of the worst coached big teams in the word at the moment. It’s definitely time to eat humble pie on our end & keep quiet.
We watch more football than ever before. There's more football on TV, online, there's European football, south American football, influencer/semi pro football, women's and youth competitions. This is why I call out the BS. Not to get all "back in my day", but I remember when I was a kid we had one Premier League game per day. One Spanish and one Serie A game. Bundesliga was on, but in terms of how much you could watch, there really was a limited amount of the sport actually on TV. At what point do we admit that being able to watch every game from every league got us fatigued of the sport in general? The anticipation to watch isn't there any more because there's football all day, all the time now. I can wake up at 2 in the morning and sportitalia and sportdigital+ have me covered with libertadores and Brazilian football. People actually traveled the world to watch Boca vs River now people in Japan follow that League. You're ruining your appetite by overconsumption. I notice this with the NBA too. "It used to be so much better and competitive" that's bullshit because unless you lived in the region to watch your team on the regional broadcast you only got the nationally broadcast games, and if you were overseas, good luck getting more than 1-2 games per week. The ability to watch the worst teams in the sport that were hidden in regional broadcasts only waters down the overall impression of the Quality. Go back and watch a game between the worst teams in the sport in every decade and it's as awful as a lot of games we sit through nowadays because we've been convinced they are worth watching and paying for. I remember talking to Somebody that worked for a Bundesliga club (I think either Gladbach or Mainz) and he told me he cannot imagine why a person from England or France would want to sit through their games instead of watching Liverpool or Arsenal.
This is why I only watch Real Madrid games nowadays. Maybe a total of 10 other league games from Spain/Italy/England, and other CL knockout when we're knocked out. Fatigue is real. I even skipped last world cup and I think I'll skip this one too. As far as NBA is concerned, I used to be obsessed with it from 1999-2006, staying up often to catch a game with my buddies, checking every box score etc. I wouldn't say the product hasn't suffered at all. It's subjective, but since everyone now is a decent shooter, a lot of the game happens from the periphery now and less from inside the lane. TBH with you, I miss the times when three pointers were a rarer thing. But that's just me. Then you look at whatever the slamdunk contest became and you have to despair over the lack of excitement. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoy watching a game here and there, but I do think the product was significantly better years ago.
It's funny because those are two factors that have become so much better that they are practically automatic. There is not a single NBA player that dunks better than somebody that dedicates his training to it. An NBA player doing an under the legs dunk used to capture the imagination, now there's guys doing an under the legs 360 blindfolded. It's the same thing happening in football. Technology and analysis is helping to raise the floor so the game is less entertaining by default because everybody is kind of good and you can't catch anybody by surprise anymore. Imagine that everybody used to send scouts to games of an opponent to watch them, hilarious from today's perspective. Now we have biometric data of players from the third division. You can pay to watch games with the coaching/tech data overlay on top of it. An insane jump in analysis and preparation.
You don't even have to go back and watch the worst teams. Watch the 1966 WC final. Today, you almost never see a player as wide open like Hurst was to score that equalizer. And it wasn't just that one play. Most of the 120 minutes were just poor in terms of quality and seemed to be in slow motion. Anyway, I know that's a bit of an unrelated example because with Arsenal its not about quality but playing style. Yesterday's match went exactly how they planned and wanted it to go, not just due to tactics but they have the quality to execute those (defensive) tactics.
Funny enough, italy played the most miserable bunker and counter ball at times and it was "ah, si, but this is italllia, is a tactical and defense!" It's like i said in another thread, the "look" and image plays such a huge part in this. Everything is about the message. When Germany lost to them in 2006 the Germans were complaining about how they deserved more, but to paraphrase a song "no time for losers". Arsenal were literally the ones losing in elegance being made fun of for it.
It's not just overconsumption though. There are real statistical and aesthetic differences to the game. For example, on the left is the top 10 in total passes of the premier league in 14/15 and on the right is this year. Notice anything? And this is just one decade of change. It's simply a fact that the game has changed. There are many stats that point to this, from more passes by defenders to more set piece goals to less take-ons by wingers. It does change the game viewing experience.
This is what annoys me the most. Even when Barcelona don't win the league, they're usually competitive 'till close to the end. 2021-'22 might be the only exception I can think of for a season that started off in a hole and never recovered. Whereas just in the last 15 years we can point to 2012-'13 (15 points behind), 2017-'18 (17), 2018-19 (19), and 2022-'23 (10) as seasons where, for all intents and purposes, the season was over no later than the beginning of March, all those deficits were entrenched by those times, if not earlier. When things don't go our way domestically, we just tend to give up too easily. The only season on that list where I don't care much about our lack of competitiveness was '18-'19 since we all knew that was gonna be a rebuilding year, but there's not much excuse for those other seasons; we were CL semifinalists in all three of those seasons, won it in one of them, obviously quality wasn't a problem, it was other stuff.
Messi being real. Poor Mbappe must have hated watching those full matches. 🚨🗣️ Idrissa Gueye: "When I was at PSG, I asked Messi and Mbappé to watch Everton matches with me.""Mbappé used to come, he enjoyed watching them... But Messi wasn't into it.""Messi always used to tell me: 'Brother, your team always loses!" pic.twitter.com/u47C3J51gi— The Touchline | 𝐓 (@TouchlineX) March 5, 2026
Meh, I'd been watching him/Spurs, because a buddy of mine wants him for Barça. In watching him, yeah he's big, pacy, and left footed. You see the goals scored, and he's 24. On the other hand, he's always injured, he's gonna cost close to €100MM, and he looks like he's quitting on Spurs. Oh, and he also doesn't look like he takes to coaching all that well. On balance, he "could be" a piece, but there's a lot of risk in van de ven. If you're looking for a leader/defensive organizer and top player, I think you'll be disappointed. If your club already has someone to lead the defense, and you've got cash to burn on the position/other, healthier and more reliable players, then he could be a fit. TL/DR: I wouldn't want van de ven for either madrid or Barça, for a variety of reasons.
Q. Best trainer you’ve played with?Bale: “Modric or Kroos… Isco as well.”Q. Worst trainer?Bale: “Hazard.” (laughs)Q. Most skillful teammate?Bale: “Isco. He was as similar as I’ve seen to Zidane.”Q. Best player you’ve ever played with?Bale: “Cristiano Ronaldo.”Q.… pic.twitter.com/oBHgLl2Xzy— EH (@EHcomps) March 5, 2026
I listened to that interview this morning. I thought he came across well. Said Man Utd tried to sign him when he was leaving Spurs and even offered more money, but RM were the club he knew he wanted to join so turned them down.
Could it be that back in 1966, probably 2/3rds of those players were chainsmokers, that the equipment (boots and balls) were heavy and primitive, and that there were no substitutions in the game back then? Nowadays, with fitness being an essential piece of the puzzle, basically no one smokes (except for Szczesny), and 5 subs per game means that everyone presses. You've got 20 outfield players with alien-like VO2 max capacities, plus half of them can be swapped out each match. Boots and balls are made from space age lightweight polymers, instead of heavy, durable leather. The game's changed in 60 years, even in the past 5 or 10.
That said, you couldn't get away with partying like an animal "back in the day" either. George Best was basically washed up soon after his 26th birthday, which is about when Ronaldinho's career went into the dumpster. But maybe that kind of thing was more common in the past(?). Not sure, but just the fact that it would've been easier to get away with decades ago makes me think more players succumbed to that temptation.
Yeah, Georgie didn't commit himself to fitness. Back then, that probably meant switching to those sissy-assed FILTERED cigs, and limiting it to 5 or 6 beers a night during the season.