Liberals should not support homosexual marriage

You're afraid of being forced to marry gay, aren't you?

 

How so?

 

Did this really need a new thread?



Dante, Garcia,

How about merging this into the Kerry thread?

 

So, your point is that if gay marriages are banned then all of the gays will go straight, marry into heterosexual relationships and produce children thus saving humanity. That's the worst arguement I've seen in a long time.

Murf

 

Given that the future of humanity is at stake, this deserves its own thread.

 

I had no idea how serious the issue was.



Besides, I thought the future of humanity would be on Mars and other planets once Bush gets that whole thing going.

 

Please don't lock or move this -- it's already my favorite thread ever!

 

I wonder how verybig verybigdog is, if you catch my drift, wink wink, nudge nudge.

Maybe he's gotten a few proposals of marriage at his local bathhouse.

 

Perhaps and "Humanity Risk Meter" is in order ... five colors

Red = homosexual activity extreme - very high risk of human extinction

Orange = homosexual activity elevated - substantial risk of human extinction

Yellow = homosexual activity normal relative to other members of the animal kingdom - normal Darwinistic risk of extinction

(I just realized I don't know the colors below Yellow ...)

Green = homosexual activity appropriately repressed - minimal extinction risk

Blue = homosexual activity thoroughly stigmatized and driven underground - humans free to concern themselves with eco-disaster, nukes and other lesser risks of extinction

 

Gay marriage for Martians! Now!

 

And if people who express opinions such as you have expressed here are representative of what humanity has to offer, I'm not so sure it merits a future.

 

You continue to claim this, yet provide no support.

If anything, you should be encouraging gay people to pair off. That way the gay gene dies out, and we don't run the risk of gay people spreading their clearly inferior genes by breeding. Imagine - if all of these gay people bred, the gay population would grow out of control!

 

Re: Re: Re: Liberals should not support homosexual marriage

Well, it's the thought that counts.

 

So, I was just speaking with Airman Kitchens (irishFS1912) about how the bigsoccer politics board is usually devoid of an excess of intellegence or reason. I think this thread is a marvelous example of that. I can say, without hyperbole, that the starting post to this thread is the stupidest thing I've read on the internet in at least a week.

Then again, if around 3-10% of the population is finally allowed to wed, I can definently see humanity becoming extinct in say, 4 to 5 years tops. Yes, yes... I think I've got something here -- it is not nuclear weapons, alien attack (a la the greatest film of all time - Independence Day), monkeys taking over, terrorism or a lack of oil that presents a serious threat to the extinction of human kind. Oh no, it is clearly going to be the homosexuals! I mean, they already kanoodle around freely now but imagine if they were doing it WITH WEDDING RINGS!!

Thank you verybdog, I see the light!! ::vomit::

 

Vbdog was being sloppy - he should have said that doing such things will put us on the road to decadence and ruin, and we will end up being conquered by the Islamic barbarians.

But, we'll see it coming, because it will happen first in Europe.

So, you liberals, when you've got an Iranian giving it to you in the rear in an Islam re-education camp, enjoy it because you asked for it.

 

Truth.

 

If the human race becomes extinct, who would miss us?

 

This is when it's fun to be a liberal. Hee hee. Given the scenario above won't the conservatives be getting the "Iranian" treatment too? I mean we are all gonna be captives of Islam once them gay people start marryin off, right?

No wonder GWB can still get 20% of the vote or so. Best thread ever!

 

verybdog, most likely

 

Islamic barbarians... Christian barbarians. I'm torn. Well, at least the Christain barbarians look like me (more of them than the Islamic barbarians, anyway), so I guess I'm with you, Smiley321. As long as our little civilization is going to hell, I guess I'd rather it go in a handbasket than a hat-box, even if the hat-box is more fabulously decorated.

BTW, (not-so) breaking news from San Francisco. They don't give a rat's ass what you think. Marriage mania grips S.F. as gays line up for licenses
Scores of couples camping out in the name of love

 

Wow, that well thought out, finely delivered opening message has changed my mind. No way I can support gay marriage, or even civil unions, now.

 

So, anyone think verybdog and co. are praying for the big earthquake to hit SF?

And when it does, whether it's today or 70 years from now, you can bet that someone will say, "see! I told you God hates queers!"

Okay, someone besides Fred Phelps.