Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire. (Obama's promise to televise health care negotiations)

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by Steamer, Jan 6, 2010.

  1. bojendyk

    bojendyk New Member

    Jan 4, 2002
    South Loop, Chicago
    I almost accidentally clicked on that link. Luckily, I noticed the word "Breitbart" in the URL, thus saving me from accidentally looking at some bullshit.
     
  2. Metrogo

    Metrogo Member

    Apr 6, 1999
    Washington Hghts NY
    I hate to even dignify this ridiculous thread with something serious. But the health care debate has been so public it can make you sick. Are you suggesting that what Obama promised was that every time two legislators get together to talk about health care reform, it has to be on tv?
     
  3. VFish

    VFish Member+

    Jan 7, 2001
    Atlanta, GA
    Club:
    Atlanta
    Bullshit is a good way to describe it alright:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Api4fUziAnI&"]YouTube- obama C span[/ame]
     
  4. marek

    marek Member+

    Lechia Gdańsk
    Jun 27, 2000
    Club:
    OSP Lechia Gdansk
    Nat'l Team:
    Poland

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Metrogo

    Metrogo Member

    Apr 6, 1999
    Washington Hghts NY
    What Barack Obama said in this video is exactly what has happened. The debate, the negotiations have all taken place in public, and it is easy to see what the motivations of individual members of congress are. We know how each one feels. This is exactly as it should be, and exactly how Obama described it during the campaign.

    Really, vfish, there's plenty in the two bills which you can criticize as a matter of policy. This is the best you and your right wing kook associates can come up with?
     
  6. saosebastiao

    saosebastiao New Member

    May 22, 2005
    This individual thing is pretty petty to stand up about. But these things are starting to add up. At what point does it become a big deal?
     
  7. VFish

    VFish Member+

    Jan 7, 2001
    Atlanta, GA
    Club:
    Atlanta
  8. MtMike

    MtMike Member+

    Nov 18, 1999
    the 417
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's kinda funny that a thread about Mr. Hope and Change's dishonesty is described as trolling and that conduct is defended by many on here. If this was Bush, there would have been 4 threads on this subject demanding his impeachment.
     
  9. appoo

    appoo Member+

    Jul 30, 2001
    USA
    What the hell?

    During the campaign, though, candidate Obama regularly promised something different - to broadcast all such negotiations on C-SPAN, putting the entire process of pounding out health care reform out in the open. (That promise applied to the now-completed processing of forging House and Senate bills, too.)

    Yet again, another so-called controversy dialed up, not because people are actually upset over what's going on, but because they reach to find a way to castigate the President, merely because of who and what he is.
     
  10. Chris M.

    Chris M. Member+

    Jan 18, 2002
    Chicago
    The thing is, they are really not adding up. In every instance that Obama made a promise about the way his administration would be run, he has lived up to it . . . almost. For example, he has the strictest lobbyist policy of any administration ever. Then he makes exceptions for a couple of key appointees and everyone goes apeshit. Fine. He didn't hit 100% but should we really bitch and moan about 95%?

    Probably the biggest legitimate beef was the amount of time the stimulus was posted on the internet before the final bill was signed. Although, I might simply be remembering right wing noise on that. I wasn't terribly bothered as the whole process was open and multiple drafts of the bill were available for review and critique.

    This is another chest-thumping example of nothing. This has been incredibly open from the start. Now we are down to meetings between Pelosi, Reed and a few others and people want Obama to use his bully pulpit to force those meetings on tv? Whatever.

    Colbert did a great piece last night. Many of the health care meetings that were took place were on cspan and the videos were uploaded. Those videos had viewer hits of 10, 92 etc. Give me a fricking break. If all of the people complaining now had actually clicked on those links to see the real substance debated, those hits would be in the tens of thousands.

    This is just more political gamesmanship which is the only thing the republicans have at this point.
     
  11. Chris M.

    Chris M. Member+

    Jan 18, 2002
    Chicago
    Hey, why do you always have to bring up Bush? :D

    But seriously, do you really want to do a comparison of this process and say . . . oh, I don't know . . . . the energy policy meetings Cheney held?
     
  12. VFish

    VFish Member+

    Jan 7, 2001
    Atlanta, GA
    Club:
    Atlanta
    Odd, I don't recall seeing Mary Landrieu negotiating her “Louisiana Purchase” on C-SPAN. Nor do i remember watching Ben Nelson and Harry Reid haggle over the final details for Nelson’s decisive 60th vote. Nope, none of those backroom shenanigans were on C-SPAN.

    And if you don't think people are legitimately upset I suggest you take a look at Arnold's speech from yesterday withdrawing his support.
     
  13. argentine soccer fan

    Staff Member

    Jan 18, 2001
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Club:
    CA Boca Juniors
    Nat'l Team:
    Argentina
    My thinking is that this is a tempest in a teapot. I don't think transparency is a big issue in the long term. I think what people will remember is the result of the health care bill, not whether it was televised or not.

    This is not a "read my lips" type of thing, as some on radio are claiming. People were pissed by G.H. Bush lying about raising taxes, because it affected them personally and directly. On the other hand, this so called controversy is all about process. I am sure most people will forget about the process, and remember the reality of whether the health care bill will solve some of their health care problems or create more.

    In fact, the majority of people do not follow the process closely, not like most of us who like arguing politics and post in here do. But when the health care reform law hits them, that is when they will react positively or negatively.

    What is true is that Obama has very clearly identified himself with this bill, and he is staking much of his reputation on its results, which by design will take years to sort themselves out. Much of Obama's legacy will depend on whether the average American perceives that this bill improves the health care situation in America or worsens it.

    So, we'll have to wait and see the net effects of this bill. Will health care costs go down for most people, or continue to go up? Will medical service become more accessible or get more restrictive? Will people with pre-existing conditions get more fair treatment? How will people uninsured by choice take it when they realize the government now forces them to buy health insurance?

    As these things sort themselves out, how we got the bill will be largely forgotten. People's reactions to how the bill affects them in practical terms will determine if Obama's efforts end up being a failure or a success.
     
  14. MtMike

    MtMike Member+

    Nov 18, 1999
    the 417
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Plus, didn't senators have 48 hours or so to vote on it after receiving a bill well over 1,000 pages? Most Senators didn't even know exactly what was in the bill.
     
  15. appoo

    appoo Member+

    Jul 30, 2001
    USA
    Then you're being ridiculous if you honestly expected to see back room dealings in the House being aired on C-SPAN. Which you never did.

    The majority of the Republican lawmakers and media mouth pieces have simply been sabotaging the entire effort to get health care reformed, to the detriment of the country.

    There is ZERO reason why they should be allowed to participate, or witness these negotiations.
     
  16. MtMike

    MtMike Member+

    Nov 18, 1999
    the 417
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This is true to a certain extent. But if we're gonna bring up HW, then people will be just as angry when this bill raises their taxes, or affects them in ways they don't like. Even if it doesn't end up doing that (which I highly doubt), that's the perception right now

    Which is one reason popular support for the healthcare bill is not exactly overwhelming.
     
  17. saosebastiao

    saosebastiao New Member

    May 22, 2005
    Do you really think this health care bill is good for the country? Really?
     
  18. Chris M.

    Chris M. Member+

    Jan 18, 2002
    Chicago
    Yes. Really.
     
  19. appoo

    appoo Member+

    Jul 30, 2001
    USA
    Before the conservatives started lying and demonizing the effort? yes. But after they started, nothing that could actually truly reform the way we deliver health care or pay for it could be touched.
     
  20. VFish

    VFish Member+

    Jan 7, 2001
    Atlanta, GA
    Club:
    Atlanta
    Talk about being ridiculous, how can you sabotage a process you’re not part of? From the beginning of the administration took the attitude “I won” and don’t need bi-partisan support. The whole debate was simply a matter of getting the Democrat minions in line.
     
  21. appoo

    appoo Member+

    Jul 30, 2001
    USA
    "government taking control of your health care!"
    "Death panels!"
    "Public Option is the devil!"
    "Rationing!"
    "I don't want the government touching my Medicare!"
     
  22. saosebastiao

    saosebastiao New Member

    May 22, 2005
    Maybe you could name the concessions that was made to appease a republican. From what I can see, all the concessions were made to appease democrats and their special interests.
     
  23. Metrogo

    Metrogo Member

    Apr 6, 1999
    Washington Hghts NY
    Not even, it's more desperation from the right wing fringe that has hijacked the Republican party. This all happened in the open. What they are saying is that every thought, every time two people talk to each other in the senate or house about health care reform, it's gotta be televised. That's a ridiculous stretch of what he said. And the principals -- the reasons he laid out on why it is important to do it in the open -- have been achieved. You know why Ben Nelson voted the way he did, Lieberman, Mary Landrieu. Do what you want with the informtion.

    Every member of congress's position is known. Just because some very lazy CBSTV reporter says otherwise doesn't make it so.
     
  24. Metrogo

    Metrogo Member

    Apr 6, 1999
    Washington Hghts NY
    No single payer system. No universal health care.
     
  25. appoo

    appoo Member+

    Jul 30, 2001
    USA
    hamstringing the power of a panel that was supposed to make laws to improve health care delivery based on studies they run (death panels! rationing!)

    Not even a hint of a public option (the government is going to take over your health care!!)

    Not being able to take away the monopoly waiver for the Health insurance industry (government intrusion in our lives!)

    No longer allowed to use your OWN money to buy an abortion when you buy a health exchange offering (the government is funding abortions!!!)

    Zero hint of premium control (goverment intruding on our lives!)

    If you noticed, and I'm sure you do, every single democrat (other than the Sen. of the Insurance Industry, Leibermann), was from a conservative state, and more than likely feared for their public lives.

    The conservatives and tea party folks have played a HUGE role in this effort...to the detriment of our country.
     

Share This Page