Judge Rules Provisions of Patriot Act Unconstitutional

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by Barbara, Sep 6, 2007.

  1. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This is good news.

    This has a ways to go in the courts but it's nice first step. I apologize for starting a thread with little to no potential for talk of shoe bumping, butt sex or midget strippers.
     
  2. YankHibee

    YankHibee Member+

    Mar 28, 2005
    indianapolis

    More importantly, the gov't will have trouble finding out just how much we like these things.
     
  3. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    Why does the Constitution hate America?!?
     
  4. Matt in the Hat

    Matt in the Hat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 21, 2002
    Brooklyn
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    And the system works. Good news.
     
  5. Claymore

    Claymore Member

    Jul 9, 2000
    Montgomery Vlg, MD
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If the system worked, this POS never would have seen the light of day.
     
  6. Matt in the Hat

    Matt in the Hat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 21, 2002
    Brooklyn
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well that's our fault for electing douchebags to congress.
     
  7. yossarian

    yossarian Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 16, 1999
    Big City Blinking
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This case is the government's second swing on enforcing the non-disclosure provisions of national security letters sent by the FBI to ISPs, phone companies, etc., to collect customer records in accordance with 18 USC Sec. 2709.

    In 2004, this same judge (Judge Marrero) struck down Sec. 2709 on 1st and 4th Amendment grounds. In 2006, the statute was amended in a response to the judge's decision. Now Judge Marrero is saying that Sec. 2709 still sucks....ie., violates the 1st Amendment and separation of powers.
     
  8. Chris M.

    Chris M. Member+

    Jan 18, 2002
    Chicago
    I disagree. In an ideal system, congress wouldn't pass laws at odds with the constitution. This is a good example of how the system works quite well.
     

Share This Page