I'm not saying if we don't win that we need to push the panic button. I'm not even saying if we don't win that we need to take the glass case off the top of the panic button. But I am saying that if we don't win we need to clear off the clutter that is now on top of the panic button so that we can keep it in clear sight.
BTW - has any coach in the history of the game ever succeeded by asking his players not to play so fast? If Rydstrom wants us to wait to counter attack until the other team's defense gets set, then we are in for a load of trouble this season. Unless y'all enjoy watching Diego Rossi & Co. try to break down a low block.
Well said. I'm of the mindset where the new coach basically gets a free pass in his first year. There's gotta be time to install the new mindset, etc. We've talked on here about how the 2020-2023/24 golden age is behind us and it's been time to rebuild. That time is definitely now. I don't think we're in "must win" territory yet, but if we don't play inspired *and* score goals on Saturday, we're definitely headed in that direction. A 2-2 come-from-behind tie where the guys show fight? Maybe there's some promise there. A 0-0 stinker or a game where we give up a late lead to tie/lose? Yeah, that might be a sign of how the season is gonna go.
I just need to see clear ideas on the field. Right now, it all looks very slow, multiple players look lost.
Yeah, it's almost like playing under a new coach after losing one of the best midfielders in MLS history is something you don't adjust to right away.
? His whole plan is getting the ball from the back to the attacking 3rd as quickly as possible. We just stink at doing that rn
Wasn’t the Nashville vs Miami score 0 - 0 ; ) ? I completely agree with your post though, I’m just not as hung up on the score. My focus is on how well we play because to quote Bogert, Nashville is a wagon.
I agree with you here. I think when Rydström says not to play so fast, he wants the passer to pause a beat before playing the pass to allow the runs from the relational players to develop. We played a lot of quick vertical passes that were played too quickly and resulted in turnovers. It didn't look much better in week 3 which is disappointing and a little bit expected. We played the best team we've faced so far and are still tinkering with lineups, positioning, defensive shape, etc. It's a work in progress, hopefully that progress is positive in week 4 and shows up on scoresheet.
The problem with the lack of identity was last game.We sold out to help the defensive shape. If you look at the heat maps, we did a much better job of combining and staying really tight and close together the first 2 games. But in the last game, max, diego, and wes, were all very separated at the top and from the base of the formation. We did a lot to just protect our own goal
Yep. It's the start of a 3 year cycle. But I really want to see improvements being made each time we go out there.
Does not affect anyone here, but this should not be the mindset at HSG. @Kyle Crew is spot on calling this out. - The "Let's conduct mass layoffs to make our numbers and claim it's AI" has started. Central Ohio isn't going to be immune from it affecting purchasing decisions, unless everyone is going to go work at Vertiv. - Moving schedules and asking for a 20+ game season ticket commitment. - And starting a local NWSL team, which will cannibalize some Crew match attendees, especially if that league stays Spring-Fall. Crew got profitable when casuals bought into winning soccer at a new stadium. If asset valuation (dome, NWSL) is all HSG cares about now ... Central Ohio will respond accordingly.
I'm not sure what your theory is here. The economy is about to get slammed, so a sports franchise shouldn't plan for the long run; only the here and now? I understand the frustration that our FO seems to react painfully slowly, and has for the last couple of off-seasons. But the solution is still to get it right. Instant gratification doesn't usually work out.
I thought you were of a mindset that a Crew head coach someday could arrive, work with the existing roster and not push the "it's a process / I need my guys" narrative.
Why shouldn't sports teams try and be competitive every year? Especially in MLS. If folks think there a mile deep loyalty to pay to attend games at SMGF ... the disappearance of the Crew ST wait list in one off-season would suggest otherwise. Also ... Seattle, Galaxy, LAFC. Now Miami. Cincinnati likely too. You think those fans would be cool with a 3-year rebuild? I think not.
I'm not saying they shouldn't. In a parity league, you can and should at least be "competitive" every year. But there's different definitions of that depending on how much cap space you have, who's already under contract and who you've lost to retirement or greener pastures. But trying to make moves just to sell tickets to next weekend's match is different from trying to build a competitive roster that's "competitive" for titles. I'm truly shocked to find that more people are willing and wanting to attend matches when the team is really good than when they're not. Raising ticket prices when the product on the field got worse is not good strategy, to be sure. I'm not surprised in the dip in attendance. I'm not exactly rearranging my budget to get to a game these days, either. But whether we like it or not, we DO have a new coach, what's done is done, and it's not going to be smooth sailing right away. With very few exceptions, the recipe for success in this league is to bake the cake and THEN add the icing; not get the icing first and then hope the cake forms underneath. Cool? Maybe not. But if you think that all of those teams aren't eventually going to wind up going through one, you're crazy. Even Miami. Messi isn't going to be here forever, and once he leaves, his friends aren't going to magically just want to play there at the rate they do now. 3-year-rebuilds are always going to be in the cards, and whether the fans are cool with it or not isn't really changing the reality of that.
Ah. Yeah, it would be nice. Because he said in preseason that he liked the roster and he could work with it. Then he said he didn't have enough time to implement his system. Then after two games he stopped doing whatever he was doing (not Nancy's tactics, but obviously not his 'relationism' either), and parked the bus, said that didn't work as planned. He already said he'd adjust again for Nashville. ....................... I have a crazy idea. How about just play to the team's current strengths and not its weaknesses? Why play a highline with 3 CBs in their 30's who are slow? Why try and play through midfield when you have no midfielders to play through? Play through your speedy wingbacks. Abou Ali is good in the air, fvcking cross the ball. Let Rossi and the others crash the box as secondary runners. Another crazy idea: Rydstrom already said he'd rather play a different system. I don't know, maybe just go ahead and try it? Yes, losing Nagbe is huge. Continuing to try and play through midfield when you don't have dudes that can do it seems kinda... I'll be generous and say naïve.