It's a just war, say Iraq's exiles By Adam Lusher and Fiona Govan (Filed: 16/02/2003) Iraqi exiles in Britain yesterday condemned the anti-war march and warned that it would make it easier for Saddam Hussein to continue massacring his own people. As hundreds of exiles, many of them with first-hand experience of Saddam Hussein's brutality, prepared to stage their own counter-demonstration in London today, many spoke with anger as they watched the peace protesters pour through the streets of London. ... As his sister Nibal, 43, prepared the chicken and rice, Ali al-Ezzawi, 51, insisted that there had to be "a war against Saddam to help the Iraqi people" as he struggled to make sense of protesters' slogans, shaking his head with disbelief as he spotted one saying: "A scud against Bush is worth two against Saddam." "Why do they say these silly things? No one inside Iraq will agree with what they are doing now. They are waiting day by day for Saddam Hussein to be deposed, for the unfinished business of 1991 to be completed," said Mr al-Ezzawi. ... "Saddam Hussein doesn't care. He is the biggest criminal in the world. There needs to be a war against Saddam Hussein, a war for the Iraqi people. That has to be better than allowing him to continue killing all these people." Mr al-Ezzawi was unable to keep the anger out of his voice as he agreed. "Yes, no-one seems to be thinking about that. The people on the anti-war march, they don't seem to realise, they don't have any idea what Saddam Hussein is like, the massacres, the genocides he has committed. "I am supporting a war against Saddam Hussein. It's not a war against Iraq - it is a war against Saddam. It doesn't seem to be a point that many people on the anti-war march are making." ... "Most Iraqi people will feel hurt and anger when they see Saddam Hussein show great pleasure at the scenes of the march today on television," he said. "The march will not serve Iraqi people. It will serve only Saddam Hussein. This is probably the last real chance to get rid of him and finish this dark era in history. They should not even go to the UN. The UN is a system which can be very easily deceived." Dr Khalaf said he was particularly angry at the lack of action, or even vocal protests, by those on the march against the years of atrocities carried out by Saddam against the Iraqi people. "Where were you all while Saddam was killing thousands of Iraqis since the early 70s? And where are you now, given that every week he executes people through the "court of revolution", a summary court run by the secret security office?" he said. "Just ask yourselves why, out of 500,000 Iraqis in Britain, you will not find even 1,000 of them participating in the march? I am so frustrated by the appalling views of most of the British people. Your anti-war campaign has become mass hysteria and you are no longer able to see things properly." Full article
Pretty powerful stuff. This, in my opinion, is where the mainstream media in this country is really dropping the ball. Go out and find some Iraqi exiles and ask them what they think of all this. My guess is they'll get answers similar to the ones in this article.
I work in a city with a heavy Iraqi population, the largest outside the Arab world, Dearborn (Michigan). I meet and talk to lots of Iraqi immigrants and I have yet to find ONE who isn't looking with anticipation towards Sadam's removal. There was also an anti-war rally in Detroit over the weekend and I didn't see a single Iraqi face in the crowd, despite their close proximity to the city.
Third world exiles are overrated. Generally speaking, they fled their country when the going got tough. Now they want to pass judgement from a save haven. Generally, speaking, let me hear from those who chose to stick with their homeland.
That's a pretty bold statement. I don't know if you intended it to be as such, but it pretty much says that a large amount of American citizens are "overrated" because they came here instead of sticking it out back at home. Freddy Adu would be horrified to hear this.
I was not clear. I should have said that the opinions of exiles about their home countries are overrated. Spare me the Adu example (Hail Adu, full of grace). His family won an immigration lottery. Dumb luck.
I'm sure there are Iraqis in Iraq and outside who would cream in colors at the thought of the US invading and ousting Saddam. And I'm sure the liberal media can give you a few stories about some schmendrick or other in Baghdad saying something to the effect of "We don't hate America, why does America want to kill us?" I read a few this week. And, I'm sure Miami is crawling with kidnappers who still want the US to Pearl Harbor Castro and re-establish Mob Rule (note subtle political irony). AND, I remember when there were stories about Afghan civilians under the Taliban who didn't want to catch a daisy-cutter face first. Maybe I'm just feeling irritable tonight, but I'd have to eat a couple of bran muffins in order to give a **** about any of them. What happened to America deciding what was best for American foreign policy? The humanitarian rationalization has made a big comeback on the board, and that's an issue that deserves some serious discussion. But we should lay waste a nation because a couple of exiles are sizing their heads for De Gaulle hats? Put a quarter in the "don't" jar.
Actually I don't think the idea is to lay waste to Iraq. It's to oust its political leadership. Then to build up the country economically in much the same way we built up South Korea. According to Tom Friedman in the NY Times, the gross domestic product of all the Arab nations combined doesn't equal that of Spain. The result is an environment that breeds extremists like Hamas and AQ because there's so damn much poverty. The region is BADLY in need of some economic stability and Iraq has the resources to become the economic cornerstone of the region. The feeling is if Iraq is strong economically, the other countries in that region will be motivated to make some cultural and economic changes. This hopefully leads to less poverty and greatly diminishes the number of potential recruits for Osama and his merry band. I'm not saying it will work, but according to Friedman, who knows what he's talking about, that's the plan. Piledriving Iraq and its infrastructure would be conterproductive to that goal.
Well can't the all-powerful US just fricking assassinate Saddam then? If they're gonna go ahead anyways...
I've tried to explain this many times, but we are powerless to destroy Saddam. Several sequels are in the works and Saddam is a major character. Son of Saddam just won't cut it.
Very nice article. Funny what a big difference there is between British Iraqi's and Dutch Iraqi's! A majority of the Iraqi's over here do not want a war.
If poverty is so important, why is there terrorism in Spain? (re: Eta) I saw this "Iraqi exile" (actually, she was born in Kuwait and has lived most of her life in England) on the TV this morning and she struck me as being naive. She seemed to think that the minute the US gets rid of Saddam, some sort of Western democracy, electing Iraqis, will forever govern Iraq. However, reading the Times today, they say it is going to be governed for at least 2 years by a retired American general (Garner) who will answer to Rumsfeld and Franks.
i agree. i would much rather listen to college students who equate peace with che guevara pictures.... you could also pick anyone who was talking on the chicago local news(i tuned in awaiting hilarious times, they started talking and hilarious times were had)...it was more embarassing for them than it was for me.
I kind of like to listen to people that have never been in the military, have no chance of getting called to war, and don't have the balls to back up their beliefs (by signing up) cheer on our military like they are the home team in a WC qualifier against Iraq.
if that was directed at me take a look at my profile hoss. i'm enlisted my date is teetering at moving up because of this awesome stuff. (airforce intelligence applications...if you care) thanks for playing.
Air Force doesn't count. They don't get shot at. Go tell them you want to switch to Marines or Army. My comments were not directed at specificly but you can take them that way if you want?
You are a moron. It's all about the oil for you guys isn't it? If the US wanted to fight a war over oil, we would have invaded Venezuela. Its the very people throwing Euro-tantrums that rely on Mid East oil.
i've heard this one a thousand times trust me. and if you have those feelings you're terribly ignorant. pilots get shot at all the time. combat controllers, para-rescue. not only that without the airforce nothing goes anywhere. i'm pleased you're so ignorant about what it takes to be a real defender of the country.
Way to go you ungrateful piece of trash. Tell the 8th force, or maybe Scott O' Grady that the AF doesn't get shot at. You are the dumbest, most ungreatful person on here. You have just dishonored everyone who died in a AF uniform, aswell as all who fell into enemy hands (ie John McCain). I hope the souls of the 50,000 dead airmen of WWII come to you in your sleep.
You forgot to mention Air Force Intelligence Applications. Almost as dangerous as 82nd Airborne. [/i] not only that without the airforce nothing goes anywhere. i'm pleased you're so ignorant about what it takes to be a real defender of the country. [/QUOTE] Tell the Navy that they don't move anything except Marines. The rest is done by the Air Force. My ignorance comes from the Army. That's where I learned that they don't even shoot M-16's in the Air Force. (Hope that wasn't classified) The rivalry between branches includes cheap shots. So after you've been there for awhile remember that if you make any jokes about stupid grunts that you are "ignorant about what it takes to be a real defender of the country."
the air force runs in my family. and you'll have to excuse me for not jumping all over a job like EOD disposal or security forces when i knew i could get a intel job.